ON
← Back to feed
Film documentary What were we laughing at? - The Tribunal of the Present
Germany🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Film documentary What were we laughing at? - The Tribunal of the Present

The documentary film 'Was haben wir gelacht' examines past television moments to critique historical media chauvinism and outdated moral standards. It highlights examples like Thomas Gottschalk’s behavior on a 1996 show, where he displayed dominance over female guests, and other instances of gender insensitivity in advertising and programming. The film argues that while modern viewers judge these moments through today’s ethical lens, they fail to recognize that people of the past had different values. The author emphasizes that while past morality cannot excuse practices like slavery or violence, history should not be judged by present-day standards. The piece critiques the tendency to view old norms as backward but acknowledges that understanding requires empathy for the context of the time.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Cicero logoCiceroIndependentProgressiveyesterday
Film documentary What were we laughing at? - The Tribunal of the Present

The documentary film 'Was haben wir gelacht' examines past television moments to critique historical media chauvinism and outdated moral standards. It highlights examples like Thomas Gottschalk’s behavior on a 1996 show, where he displayed dominance over female guests, and other instances of gender insensitivity in advertising and programming. The film argues that while modern viewers judge these moments through today’s ethical lens, they fail to recognize that people of the past had different values. The author emphasizes that while past morality cannot excuse practices like slavery or violence, history should not be judged by present-day standards. The piece critiques the tendency to view old norms as backward but acknowledges that understanding requires empathy for the context of the time.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames historical moral standards as outdated and criticizes past gender insensitivity, which aligns with progressive values. While it does not overtly attack specific political figures, its emphasis on challenging traditional norms and advocating for contemporary ethical perspectives is

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories