ON
← Back to feed
Killed for kiss in mosque? Secret Saudi execution of Bangladeshis sparks outrage
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 hr. ago

Killed for kiss in mosque? Secret Saudi execution of Bangladeshis sparks outrage

Saudi Arabia executed two Bangladeshi nationals, Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siti Akhtar, for 'immoral acts' committed inside a mosque in Mecca. The nature of the alleged acts remains unspecified by Saudi authorities, leading to speculation that the pair may have kissed. The executions have sparked international criticism, particularly regarding the lack of transparency surrounding the trial process and the fairness of the sentence. This follows previous controversies involving foreign nationals in Saudi Arabia, such as the case of a Sri Lankan man whose death sentence was later overturned. Questions remain about whether Bangladesh was notified prior to the executions and if diplomatic efforts could have influenced the outcome.

A Bangladeshi migrant worker, Nazrul Islam, 22, was executed in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, more than three years after he was detained by Saudi authorities. Islam was executed alongside a woman on October 14. The Saudi Interior Ministry stated that the pair were convicted of committing an “indecent act” inside a mosque. However, the nature of the act was not specified. Bangladesh authorities indicated that Saudi counterparts had shared records showing the two were detained in August 2023 for crimes, including adultery, though no mention of death sentences appeared in those documents. The Saudi ministry noted that the death sentence was awarded under ta’zir, a discretionary form of punishment in Islamic law where judges determine the offense and the sentence. Nazrul Islam Basir hailed from Birampur village under Sultanpur union of Brahmanbaria Sadar upazila and was the eldest among four siblings. He left for Saudi Arabia on November 10, 2022, and worked as a cleaner in the kingdom. He and a young woman named Sweety Akhtar were reportedly arrested by Saudi police over allegations of an “immoral act” at a mosque in Mecca. He spent about three years and three months in detention, according to his family. His mother, Rahima, said that Nazrul spoke to the family on calls every Sunday while he was in prison. She said the family was not notified in advance of his execution. Nazrul’s family has urged the government to investigate his execution and bring his body home at state expense. Brahmanbaria Deputy Commissioner Md Abu Sayeed said the administration had received no instructions regarding the matter, and the family had not submitted any application. If the body is returned to Bangladesh, officials would assist according to the rules, as Nazrul was a resident of Brahmanbaria. Confidential consular memoranda and prisoner records suggest that Nazrul and Sweety were detained in Saudi Arabia in August 2023 under separate allegations, with cybercrime cited in one case and adultery in the other. Saudi prisoner records did not mention death sentences, even though Saudi authorities announced the executions on October 14. The Saudi Interior Ministry stated that the two were executed after being found guilty by a court of committing indecent acts inside a mosque in Mecca. There is growing concern over the lack of transparency surrounding the case, particularly regarding the nature of the alleged offenses, the fairness of the trial, and whether Bangladesh was informed beforehand. Outrage has emerged following the executions, which have raised questions about the alleged crimes, the opacity of the legal process, and whether Dhaka was informed in advance and could have intervened to save the couple. Saudi Arabia is known for its high usage of capital punishment, with Human Rights Watch reporting at least 356 executions in 2025, mostly for non-violent drug-related offenses. Despite statements from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman suggesting restrictions on the death penalty to murder cases, the country still applies it broadly. The two Bangladeshis were sentenced to death under ta’zir, a category of Islamic law allowing judges discretion in determining punishment. Their sentences were reportedly upheld by judicial authorities, followed by a royal order authorizing their execution in the Mecca region. This marks the second case involving foreign nationals receiving death sentences in Saudi Arabia, with a previous instance involving a Sri Lankan immigrant whose conviction was later overturned due to diplomatic intervention. Little clarity exists regarding the exact nature of the alleged crime committed by the two Bangladeshis. Reports initially suggested they were kissing in the mosque, while subsequent speculation pointed to a forehead kiss. These claims remain unverified, and the Saudi authorities have provided minimal information beyond confirming the executions. The two individuals identified by Saudi media as Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siti Akhtar were accused of committing “immoral acts” inside a mosque in Mecca. Details about the alleged acts, the timing of their arrest, or the conduct of their trials have not been disclosed by Saudi authorities. Social media speculation suggests the two were a couple engaged in a romantic act, but such claims are unconfirmed. Prothom Alo reported that Nazrul’s family disputes these allegations. Nazrul, the eldest son of Abdul Bashir and Rahima Begum, was from Brahmanbaria Sadar upazila in Chattogram Division. He moved to Saudi Arabia in November 2022 and worked as a cleaner at Mecca’s Masjid al-Haram. His family told Prothom Alo that he was arrested eight months later and remained in prison until his execution. Relatives said they last spoke to Nazrul on October 11. Three days later, they received a call informing them of his execution. His 65-year-old aunt, Abeda Begum, fainted upon hearing the news and died shortly afterward. Nazrul’s family stated they had not received any prior notice. His father, Abdul Basir, who worked in Saudi Arabia for 24 years, claimed his son was not given a fair trial and called for justice if the execution was unjustified. Nazrul’s relatives and friends questioned the allegations, describing him as polite and well-mannered. His cousins, Mostakim Bhuiyan and Imam Hasan Bhuiyan, told Prothom Alo that he had a dispute with a Pakistani co-worker and suspected the individual had conspired against him. His friend Rahat Bhuiyan also expressed doubts about the accusations.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 806 hr. ago
Who was Nazrul Islam? Bangladesh man executed for ‘indecent act’ in Saudi Arabia

A 22-year-old Bangladeshi migrant worker, Nazrul Islam, was executed in Saudi Arabia in October 2023 for allegedly committing an 'indecent act' inside a mosque in Mecca. He was detained in August 2023 alongside a woman, Sweety Akhtar, who faced separate charges, including adultery and cybercrime. According to Saudi authorities, the pair were convicted under ta'zir, a discretionary Islamic legal penalty. Bangladesh authorities were not informed of the death sentences beforehand, and the family has requested the government to repatriate Nazrul's body at state expense. His family had taken out significant loans to fund his migration to Saudi Arabia, and they are now struggling financially due to his death.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the execution of a Bangladeshi citizen abroad, citing statements from both Saudi and Bangladeshi authorities. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the sequence of事件,

Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details about the individual, Nazrul Islam, including his age, origin, employment, and timeline of events. It cites the Saudi Interior Ministry's statement regarding the charges and the legal basis (ta'zir). It also includes statements from the individual's family and l

Why objectivity (80): The article presents facts in a relatively neutral manner, focusing on the sequence of events and quoting family members and officials. It avoids strong value judgments but still highlights the lack of communication with the family and the severity of the punishment. The tone remains mostly objectiv

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
Killed for kiss in mosque? Secret Saudi execution of Bangladeshis sparks outrage

Saudi Arabia executed two Bangladeshi nationals, Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siti Akhtar, for 'immoral acts' committed inside a mosque in Mecca. The nature of the alleged acts remains unspecified by Saudi authorities, leading to speculation that the pair may have kissed. The executions have sparked international criticism, particularly regarding the lack of transparency surrounding the trial process and the fairness of the sentence. This follows previous controversies involving foreign nationals in Saudi Arabia, such as the case of a Sri Lankan man whose death sentence was later overturned. Questions remain about whether Bangladesh was notified prior to the executions and if diplomatic efforts could have influenced the outcome.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event neutrally, focusing on the actions of Saudi Arabia and the reactions from Bangladesh and international observers. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, and provides multiple perspectives without favoring one side. The framing is objective, emphasizing the lackof

Why factuality (85): The article provides general information about the executions of two Bangladeshi nationals in Saudi Arabia for 'immoral acts' in a mosque, citing Saudi media and referencing broader context about Saudi Arabia's use of the death penalty. It mentions the legal framework (ta'zir) and references another

Why objectivity (75): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'outrage' and 'secret execution,' which may imply bias or sensationalism. It raises questions about the fairness of the trial and the lack of transparency, but does so in a way that suggests criticism of the Saudi system without overtly taking sides. T

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories