Kicillof went to Uruguay and again launched harsh criticism towards Milei: "It is our task to organize the popular discontent"

Axel Kicillof traveled to Uruguay this week, continuing his series of high-profile engagements that appear to align with campaign-style activities ahead of upcoming elections. During his visit, he participated in the Third Pan-American Congress in Montevideo, where he delivered sharp criticisms against Argentine President Javier Milei. The event brought together over 150 leaders from across Latin America, including legislators, ministers, former presidents, and other prominent figures. Kicillof was received by Uruguayan President Yamandú Orsi and signed agreements aimed at strengthening scientific research programs and agricultural policies. Kicillof emphasized that one of the key objectives of his trip was to formalize cooperation agreements in areas critical to the province of Buenos Aires. He criticized the national government for underfunding the country's scientific system while highlighting efforts to bolster institutions focused on research, innovation, and knowledge. He stated that in a world undergoing constant technological revolution, these agreements reinforce a steadfast commitment to science, technology, and regional sovereignty. In addition to signing agreements related to scientific collaboration, Kicillof also worked on initiatives to support small producers and regional economies. He noted similarities between the work of Uruguay’s Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture, and Fisheries and the goals of his own administration, which aim to bring certified and quality products to different markets. This agreement represents another step forward in promoting and supporting small-scale producers and regional economic development. During the Third Pan-American Congress, held at the Teatro Solís on Friday, Kicillof addressed attendees and spoke critically of Milei’s leadership. He described life under Milei’s government as an "inferno" for workers, students, elderly individuals, and vulnerable sectors. According to Kicillof, the national government's policies have an explicit goal of erasing and destroying the history and achievements of the Argentine people. He claimed that the ultra-right has lost its cultural battle and that the majority of the population recognizes Milei’s project as a "stupendous failure." Kicillof reiterated that organizing public discontent is their task and transforming it into a path of hope and renewal. He argued that the future lies in their productive framework, public universities, sovereignty, and dignified labor so that justice and social equity can once again prevail in Argentina. The congress, themed "Solidarity among peoples, sovereignty among nations," aimed to create a common agenda for hemispheric cooperation, focusing on peace, multilateralism, security, reindustrialization, sovereignty, and the well-being of populations. Kicillof also signed a cooperation agreement with the University of the Republic in Uruguay, linking the Buenos Aires-based Commission of Scientific Research (CIC) with the institution for joint projects in research, teaching, and technological transfer. These collaborations are intended to enhance scientific capabilities and foster regional partnerships. Under the program known as Mercados Bonaerenses, Kicillof signed an agreement with José Saavedra, president of the Metropolitan Agri-Food Unit, to develop public policies ensuring access to food, creating spaces for product commercialization, and reducing waste in marketplaces. These initiatives reflect broader efforts to address food security and support local economies through sustainable practices. The visit underscores Kicillof's ongoing efforts to build alliances and strengthen regional ties, even as he continues to criticize the current administration. His comments during the congress highlight growing tensions within Argentina, particularly between supporters of Milei’s radical economic reforms and those who advocate for more traditional leftist policies centered around social welfare and state intervention. As the political landscape evolves, Kicillof’s actions suggest a strategic push to consolidate support and position himself as a leading figure in opposition to the current government.