The German media regulatory body, the Commission for Licensing and Supervision (ZAK), has issued formal rulings against search engine providers Google and Perplexity regarding their artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content. The rulings assert that AI-powered summaries and chatbots like Google’s AI Overviews and Perplexity’s chatbot function as content providers rather than neutral information intermediaries. This classification triggers obligations under Germany’s media law, including requirements to ensure transparency and fairness in presenting third-party content. The ZAK argues that Google’s AI Overviews prioritize algorithmically generated summaries over traditional lists of links, potentially disadvantaging journalistic offerings. Similarly, Perplexity integrates external content into its responses, which the regulators claim gives it the role of a media intermediary. Both companies have the right to appeal these decisions. According to a study by professors Jan Oster and Christoph Busch cited by the ZAK, AI-generated content could disrupt traditional media ecosystems by shifting traffic away from publishers and toward AI platforms.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of regulatory actions taken by the ZAK against Google and Perplexity, citing legal arguments and academic research. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal,






