ON
← Back to feed
Insult to Opposition leaders: Mallikarjun Kharge hits out at Kiren Rijiju for replying to PM Modi letter
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive5 hr. ago

Insult to Opposition leaders: Mallikarjun Kharge hits out at Kiren Rijiju for replying to PM Modi letter

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge criticized Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju for responding to a letter addressed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, arguing that the Prime Minister is insulting opposition leaders by refusing to communicate directly. Kharge stated that the government uses ministers like Rijiju and Election Commission chief Gyanesh Kumar as fronts while avoiding direct engagement with opposition demands. The dispute centers on the government's push for a Constitutional Amendment Bill to implement 33% reservation for women in legislatures and expand the Lok Sabha, alongside delimitation proposals. Kharge demanded an all-party meeting and warned against rushing these bills without adequate consultation, noting that a previous attempt failed due to lack of a two-thirds majority. Additionally, Kharge called for the repeal of a 2023 law granting immunity to the Election Commissioner and urged the replacement of Electronic Voting Machines with traditional ballot papers.

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge stated on Tuesday that he would brief Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday regarding the opposition party’s objections to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, the proposed delimitation exercise, and the delayed implementation of women’s reservation. Speaking to reporters in Kalaburagi, Kharge confirmed he had personally sent correspondence to the Prime Minister and intended to detail the perceived harms of the electoral roll revision and the implications of the boundary redrawing process during their scheduled interaction on October 21. He specifically requested clarification on why the government had not yet implemented the reservation for women in legislative bodies. Kharge indicated that he had written to the Prime Minister four times regarding these matters. His initial communication flagged an unprecedented delay in proroguing the Monsoon Session, which was adjourned sine die on August 13. By the time of his latest letter, 64 days had elapsed without either house of Parliament being formally closed. The Congress leader urged the Prime Minister to convene an all-party meeting to discuss new delimitation proposals before they were finalized for parliamentary consideration. He warned against attempting to pass a far-reaching Constitutional Amendment Bill without adequate consultation. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju responded to Kharge’s demands in a detailed letter sent on Monday. Rijiju asserted that the government had repeatedly sought Congress cooperation through written communications in March and April, as well as direct discussions with Kharge and Rahul Gandhi. He noted that the Congress had not provided dates for talks despite repeated requests, leading the government to consult other political entities. These included the DMK, Samajwadi Party, YSRCP, NCP, Shiv Sena (UBT), AIMIM, and BJD. Rijiju rejected allegations of procedural impropriety concerning the delay in prorogation, stating there is no constitutional requirement specifying a fixed period for closing a house after it is adjourned sine die. Earlier this week, Kharge criticized Rijiju for responding to his letter on behalf of the Prime Minister. During an interaction in Bengaluru, Kharge argued that Rijiju lacked the authority to act as a proxy and was merely being used as a front, similar to how the government utilized Election Commission official Gyanesh Kumar. Kharge accused Prime Minister Modi of insulting opposition leaders by refusing to reply directly to their correspondence. He questioned whether the Prime Minister considered himself above the law or the Constitution, noting that while Modi holds a prominent position, he remains one member among 543 in the Lok Sabha. The central government is currently advancing a One Hundred and Thirty First Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2026, alongside the delimitation bill. This package aims to introduce 33 percent reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, while also expanding the size of the lower house. The previous attempt to pass the delimitation amendment failed in April because the ruling National Democratic Alliance coalition could not secure the requisite two-thirds majority in the Lok Sabha. Those bills had been made public late on April 14, followed by a special session on April 16, with the vote taking place on April 17. In his recent correspondence, Kharge also demanded the repeal of a 2023 law that grants legal protection and immunity to the Election Commissioner. He cited irregularities attributed to Gyanesh Kumar and argued that if the government desires fair elections, it must adhere to the constitutional framework, remove Kumar, and overhaul the electoral system. Kharge further reiterated the demand that traditional ballot papers replace the Electronic Voting Machine system. Separately, Kharge extended Dasara greetings to citizens nationwide, expressing hope that the festival would bring joy amidst current distress caused by rainfall deficits. He suggested organizing a grand Dasara celebration in the Kalyana Karnataka region, potentially in Kalaburagi, starting next year to promote cultural heritage and social harmony. He stated he would discuss this proposal with Karnataka Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar to gauge feasibility and ensure wide public participation.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
Kharge to raise SIR, delimitation concerns with PM Modi tomorrow

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge plans to meet with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on October 21 to address concerns regarding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, delimitation processes, and the implementation of women's reservation in legislative bodies. Kharge stated he has written multiple letters to Modi highlighting these issues, including the potential negative impacts of the SIR process and delays in proroguing Parliament. He criticized the government for not holding an all-party meeting to discuss proposed delimitation amendments and warned against rushing through significant constitutional changes. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju defended the government's actions, stating that there is no constitutional mandate for a specific prorogation timeline and that the Congress has not cooperated with previous requests for dialogue.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the concerns raised by the Congress leadership and the government's responses without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both Kharge and Rijiju, providing a balanced view of their respective positions without editorializing or biased language.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Mallikarjun Kharge plans to discuss SIR, delimitation, and women's reservation with PM Modi. It includes direct quotes from Kharge and mentions Kiren Rijiju's response. However, the article cuts off mid-sentence, so some context may be missing.

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the information neutrally but leans slightly toward the Congress perspective by emphasizing their concerns and quoting Kharge extensively. It does mention the government's position but could provide more balanced coverage of both sides.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 705 hr. ago
Insult to Opposition leaders: Mallikarjun Kharge hits out at Kiren Rijiju for replying to PM Modi letter

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge criticized Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju for responding to a letter addressed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, arguing that the Prime Minister is insulting opposition leaders by refusing to communicate directly. Kharge stated that the government uses ministers like Rijiju and Election Commission chief Gyanesh Kumar as fronts while avoiding direct engagement with opposition demands. The dispute centers on the government's push for a Constitutional Amendment Bill to implement 33% reservation for women in legislatures and expand the Lok Sabha, alongside delimitation proposals. Kharge demanded an all-party meeting and warned against rushing these bills without adequate consultation, noting that a previous attempt failed due to lack of a two-thirds majority. Additionally, Kharge called for the repeal of a 2023 law granting immunity to the Election Commissioner and urged the replacement of Electronic Voting Machines with traditional ballot papers.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the narrative entirely through the perspective of the opposition leader, quoting his accusations of insult and constitutional violation without providing counter-arguments from the government side beyond the fact that a reply was sent. It emphasizes the Prime Minister's alleged sn

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (70): The headline uses charged language ('Insult to Opposition leaders', 'hits out') which frames the event from the perspective of the complainant rather than neutrally describing the exchange. While the quotes themselves are attributed clearly, the selection of words in the summary and headline leans t

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories