Kenya's High Court rejected a Rastafarian group's attempt to legally allow cannabis use for religious purposes. The Rastafarians claimed the ban on cannabis violated their constitutional right to freedom of religion, arguing it was a sacred sacrament. However, Justice Bahati Mwamuye ruled that the community failed to prove the drug laws violated their rights and emphasized the need for a national debate on cannabis regulation. While the court upheld the constitutionality of current drug laws, it acknowledged the potential for a legal framework allowing limited religious exemptions. The Rastafarians plan to appeal the decision, citing concerns over discrimination and the need for legal recognition of their practices.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of both the Rastafarian claim and the state's counterarguments, without overtly favoring either side. The judicial ruling is described objectively, and while there is some emphasis on the societal implications of cannabis legalization, the overall tone remains






