ON
← Back to feed
Kazakhstan elects new unicameral parliament: Opposition and independent candidates barred from participation
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/23/2026

Kazakhstan elects new unicameral parliament: Opposition and independent candidates barred from participation

Kazahstan je ukinuo dvodomni parlament i prvi put birao jednodomni parlament nakon ustavne reforme. Oporbenim strankama i neovisnim kandidatima nije bilo dopušteno sudjelovati na izborima za Kurultaj, novi parlament sa 145 zastupničkih mjesta. Izbori su bili organizirani tako da potvrde vlast predsjednika Kasima-Žomarta Tokajeva, koji želi ubrzati donošenje zakona. Pravo glasa imalo je oko 12,6 milijuna birača, a odaziv je premašio 65 posto, što je činilo izbore valjanim. Na izborima je dopušteno sudjelovanje sedam stranaka, sve podržavajuće predsjednika. Birači su imali mogućnost označiti opciju 'protiv svih'. Rezultati se očekuju u ponedjeljak, a promatrači OESS trebali bi objaviti svoju ocjenu. Mediji su upozornjeni na ograničenja slobode medija i izražavanja.

Kazakhstan has held its first-ever single-chamber parliament election under a new constitutional framework, marking a significant shift in the country’s political structure. The vote, which took place on October 23, 2026, saw the abolition of the previous two-chamber system that had existed for three decades. This change was part of broader reforms aimed at consolidating executive power and accelerating legislative processes. The newly elected body, known as the Kurultay, consists of 145 seats and is intended to serve as a more streamlined institution for lawmaking. The ruling authorities emphasized that these elections would reinforce President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s authority, enabling him to expedite the passage of key legislation. The electoral process excluded opposition parties and independent candidates from participating in the contest for parliamentary seats. According to official reports, seven registered political parties were allowed to run, all of which publicly endorsed President Tokayev. Among them is the newly formed party Adilet, established with the goal of uniting support around the president. Voters were given the option to cast their ballots for "against all," a provision designed to allow dissent while maintaining the dominance of state-backed candidates. Over 12.6 million eligible voters participated, with turnout exceeding 65% by late afternoon, meeting the legal threshold for the election to be considered valid. President Tokayev has long sought to strengthen his control over the legislative branch, and this election is viewed as a step toward achieving that objective. The introduction of a vice-presidential role within the Kurultay is expected to provide a mechanism for identifying potential successors, a move that aligns with Tokayev's strategy to ensure continuity in leadership. The position of vice-president was abolished in the 1996 constitution, but its reinstatement reflects the government's intent to expand the scope of presidential influence. The election process was closely monitored by observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). These monitors are expected to release their assessment of the voting conditions and procedures in the coming days. Despite the presence of international observers, local media and journalists have raised concerns about restrictions on press freedom and the ability to freely express views. Kazakhstan, a country bordering Russia, continues to face criticism for its limited space for independent journalism and political pluralism. The absence of opposition participation in the election underscores the tight control exercised by the ruling elite. All political entities operating within the legal framework are required to align themselves with the administration’s agenda, ensuring that the legislative process remains aligned with the interests of the current leadership. This approach has been consistent with the broader trend of centralizing power in the hands of the presidency, a pattern that has characterized Kazakhstan’s political evolution since the early 2000s. As results are expected to be announced on Monday, the outcome will likely reaffirm the dominance of the ruling coalition. The election represents another milestone in the consolidation of authority under President Tokayev, further entrenching the existing political order. While the formal process appears to have adhered to legal standards, the lack of genuine competition raises questions about the legitimacy of the outcomes and the future direction of Kazakhstan’s democratic institutions.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentCenterFactual 99Objective 888/23/2026
Kazakhstan elects a new unicameral parliament without opposition.

Kazahstan je ukinuo dvodomni parlament i organizirao prvi izbor jednodomnog parlamenta nakon ustavne reforme, što je poznato kao Kurultaj. U ovim izborima nisu bile dopuštene oporbenim strankama i neovisnim kandidatima, što je smanjilo broj konkurentnih stranaka. Predsjednik Kasima-Žomart Tokajev želi da se brže donose zakoni, a novi sustav može pomoći u postavljanju potencijalnog nasljednika. Pravo glasa imalo je oko 12,6 milijuna birača, a odaziv je premašio 65 posto, što je činilo izbore valjanim. Na izborima su sudjelovale sedam stranaka, sve su ih podržavala predsjednik, a birači su imali opciju da glase protiv svih. Rezultati će biti objavljeni ponedjeljkom, a promatrači OESS planiraju da objave svoju ocjenu.

Bias read (Center): Iako su izbori organizirani pod kontrolom vlasti i s ograničenim sudjelovanjem političkih stranaka, članak ne koristi jasno opterećena riječi ili izbjegava izrazite strane pozicije. Nema jasno izraženog slanja ka jednoj strani ili drugoj, već neutralan prikaz događaja i rezultata. Promatrači su pove

Why factuality (99): This article provides an accurate account of the event, including the shift to a unicameral parliament, the exclusion of opposition groups, the president's agenda, and the participation of seven parties. These details align closely with the other articles and reflect a clear consensus among sources.

Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone throughout, though it uses the term 'authoritarian Central Asian republic,' which could be seen as a value-laden descriptor. It also mentions concerns about media freedom, which adds a slightly critical angle but remains within reasonable bounds of neu

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 858/23/2026
Kazakhstan elects new unicameral parliament: Opposition and independent candidates barred from participation

Kazahstan je ukinuo dvodomni parlament i prvi put birao jednodomni parlament nakon ustavne reforme. Oporbenim strankama i neovisnim kandidatima nije bilo dopušteno sudjelovati na izborima za Kurultaj, novi parlament sa 145 zastupničkih mjesta. Izbori su bili organizirani tako da potvrde vlast predsjednika Kasima-Žomarta Tokajeva, koji želi ubrzati donošenje zakona. Pravo glasa imalo je oko 12,6 milijuna birača, a odaziv je premašio 65 posto, što je činilo izbore valjanim. Na izborima je dopušteno sudjelovanje sedam stranaka, sve podržavajuće predsjednika. Birači su imali mogućnost označiti opciju 'protiv svih'. Rezultati se očekuju u ponedjeljak, a promatrači OESS trebali bi objaviti svoju ocjenu. Mediji su upozornjeni na ograničenja slobode medija i izražavanja.

Bias read (Center): Iako su izbori organizirani u skladu s autokratskim sistemom, članak ne koristi ekstremno negativnu ili pozitivnu terminologiju. Prikazuje događaje kao neutralnu povest, bez jasno izražene političke agresije prema bilo kojoj stranci. Iako su ograničenja slobode izražavanja naglašena, članak ne prikł

Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports the key facts about Kazakhstan's transition to a unicameral parliament, the exclusion of opposition parties and independent candidates, the role of President Tokayev, the voter turnout, and the involvement of the OSCE observers. All these details are consistently repor

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information in a mostly neutral manner but includes some potentially biased phrasing such as 'authoritarian Central Asian republic' which may imply a negative judgment about the country's political system. The mention of media freedom restrictions also introduces a critical

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 878/23/2026
Kazakhstan elects a new parliament.

Kazahstan je ukinuo dvodomni parlament koji je postojao tri desetljeća i uveden je jednodomni parlament (Kurultaj) kao dio ustavnih reformi. Oporbenim strankama i neovisnim kandidatima nije bilo dopušteno kandidirati se na izborima, što je osiguralo da će vlast predsjednika Kasima-Žomarta Tokajeva ostati nepokutana. Izbori su uključivali sedam stranaka, sve podržavajuće Tokajevu, te opciju 'protiv svih'. Prema proceni, 65% građana je odgovaralo, što je činilo izbore valjanim. Promatrači Organizacije za europsku sigurnost i suradnju (OESS) planiraju ocjeniti izbore, dok se mediji upozoravaju na ograničenja slobode medija i izražavanja.

Bias read (Center): Vijest opisuje političke promjene u Kazahstanskoj, ali bez jasno izraženog slanja. Iako su izbori kontrolirani i ograničena je sloboda izražavanja, tekst ne koristi eksplicitetno slanje ni prema lijevoj ni prema desnoj strani. Nema izraza koji bi naglašavali jednu stranu ili druge. Stoga se smatra s

Why factuality (97): The article accurately conveys the main points of the election, including the move to a unicameral system, the exclusion of opposition parties, the president's influence, and the observer role of the OSCE. However, it lacks specific details about the new party 'Adilet' compared to the other articles

Why objectivity (87): The article is generally neutral in tone but includes the phrase 'authoritarian Central Asian republic,' which might introduce bias. It also references media freedom concerns, adding a critical perspective but maintaining overall balance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories