ON
← Back to feed
Buy, scan, shred: Why AI companies buy real books for their data theft
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Buy, scan, shred: Why AI companies buy real books for their data theft

The article discusses how major AI companies, including Anthropic, are acquiring used books globally to scan them for training their artificial intelligence models, often through intermediaries like 'Zoom Books'. These books are then shredded after scanning. The practice, referred to as 'destructive scanning', has raised concerns among authors and publishers. In January 2024, the Washington Post revealed 'Project Panama', where Anthropic scanned over 500,000 copyrighted books, many obtained illegally from shadow libraries like Library Genesis. While a group of authors successfully challenged the legality of obtaining books through these channels, the court ruled in favor of Anthropic based on the U.S. 'Fair Use' principle. The case ended with an out-of-court settlement involving $1.5 billion paid to publishers and authors. In Germany, the legal framework remains unclear, as the country’s copyright laws apply to scanning physical books, making such practices legally ambiguous. Experts suggest that while owning a physical book grants certain rights, the destruction of books after scanning raises ethical and legal questions.

1 reports

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒Center7 hr. ago
Buy, scan, shred: Why AI companies buy real books for their data theft

The article discusses how major AI companies, including Anthropic, are acquiring used books globally to scan them for training their artificial intelligence models, often through intermediaries like 'Zoom Books'. These books are then shredded after scanning. The practice, referred to as 'destructive scanning', has raised concerns among authors and publishers. In January 2024, the Washington Post revealed 'Project Panama', where Anthropic scanned over 500,000 copyrighted books, many obtained illegally from shadow libraries like Library Genesis. While a group of authors successfully challenged the legality of obtaining books through these channels, the court ruled in favor of Anthropic based on the U.S. 'Fair Use' principle. The case ended with an out-of-court settlement involving $1.5 billion paid to publishers and authors. In Germany, the legal framework remains unclear, as the country’s copyright laws apply to scanning physical books, making such practices legally ambiguous. Experts suggest that while owning a physical book grants certain rights, the destruction of books after scanning raises ethical and legal questions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the issue by discussing both the actions of AI companies and the legal challenges they face. It cites multiple perspectives, including those of authors, publishers, and legal experts, without overtly favoring any particular side. The framing remains objective,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories