ON
← Back to feed
Katy Perry Freaks Out After White House Uses 'Firework' in Iran Strikes Video: 'I Am Deeply Appalled'
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

Katy Perry Freaks Out After White House Uses 'Firework' in Iran Strikes Video: 'I Am Deeply Appalled'

Pop singer Katy Perry expressed strong disapproval after the Trump White House used her 2010 song 'Firework' as background music in a TikTok video depicting Iranian military strikes. Perry stated she was neither consulted nor approved of the usage, calling it a violation of the song's intended message of hope and unity. The White House's TikTok post included footage of bombings and was captioned 'Iran has been warned,' along with a fireworks emoji. This incident follows similar controversies where other artists, such as Olivia Rodrigo, have criticized the White House for using their music in politically charged content. Perry, who has historically opposed Trump and supported his rivals, emphasized that her music aims to bring people together rather than promote violence.

Katy Perry expressed outrage after the Trump White House used her 2010 song Firework in a TikTok video depicting military strikes in Iran. The video, posted on the official White House TikTok account, featured footage of bombings and included a fireworks emoji. Perry condemned the move in a post on X, calling it a violation of the song's intended purpose. She stated, “I did not approve this, I was not asked, and I absolutely do not condone it.” Perry emphasized that Firework was meant to inspire hope and resilience during difficult times, not to accompany acts of violence. The White House released the video on Thursday, captioning it “Iran has been warned.” The clip, which appears to include unclassified military footage, was part of a broader effort by the administration to highlight perceived threats from Iran. Perry, known for her activism on issues such as immigration reform, had previously supported Democratic candidates including Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. Her criticism of the White House’s use of her music aligns with past tensions between pop artists and the administration, which has frequently incorporated songs into its viral content without permission. Perry’s reaction follows a pattern of similar disputes involving other musicians. Earlier this year, Olivia Rodrigo expressed frustration after the White House used her song All-American Bitch in an ICE-related video. These incidents have sparked debates about the ethical implications of repurposing popular music for political messaging. Perry’s post underscored her belief that her work should serve as a force for unity rather than a tool for militaristic narratives. “My music is for bringing people together, not celebrating warfare,” she wrote. The controversy highlights the growing intersection between celebrity culture and political discourse. Perry, whose career has often intersected with social justice causes, has faced scrutiny in recent months. In April, Australian authorities reportedly initiated an investigation into her over allegations of sexual misconduct by actor Ruby Rose, who played a character in John Wick: Chapter 2. Despite these personal challenges, Perry has continued to engage publicly on political matters, particularly regarding immigration policies. Her earlier posts supporting anti-ICE activism further contextualize her current stance against the White House’s use of her music. The White House’s decision to pair Firework with military footage reflects a strategy of leveraging cultural icons to amplify messages of national security. This approach has become increasingly common in digital campaigns, where viral content often blends entertainment with political commentary. However, such practices have drawn backlash from artists who feel their creative intent is being exploited. Perry’s response exemplifies the growing tension between public figures and government entities over the use of artistic works in political contexts. As the situation develops, it remains unclear whether the White House will respond directly to Perry’s criticisms. Previous instances of such disputes have typically resulted in minimal acknowledgment from the administration, though some artists have received formal apologies or compensation. Perry’s post, however, suggests a more vocal resistance to the appropriation of her music for purposes she finds objectionable. With ongoing discussions around the ethics of using popular culture in political messaging, Perry’s case may set a precedent for how artists navigate these complex intersections.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Bloomberg News logoBloomberg NewsIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
Katy Perry Decries White House Using ‘Firework’ in Iran War Post

On July 25, 2026, pop singer Katy Perry criticized the Trump administration for using her song 'Firework' without permission in a social media video depicting U.S. military strikes in Iran. In a post on X, Perry expressed outrage over the unauthorized use of her music, stating that the song's message of empowerment and self-worth was being misused to accompany acts of violence. She emphasized that she had neither approved nor been consulted regarding the decision, calling it a violation of her artistic intent. The incident highlights concerns about the appropriation of cultural symbols for political messaging.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of artistic integrity and ethical use of cultural content, aligning with progressive values that emphasize individual rights and moral responsibility. The focus on the misuse of a song with a positive message for violent purposes reflects a left-leaning,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Katy Perry criticized the White House for using her song 'Firework' in a military strike video without her consent. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that Perry expressed outrage over the unauthorized use of her music. However, it does not provide specific

Why objectivity (70): The article presents Perry's criticism in a strong, emotionally charged tone, emphasizing her outrage. While it provides factual information, it frames the situation primarily from Perry's perspective, potentially biasing the narrative toward her viewpoint.

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 657 days ago
Katy Perry Freaks Out After White House Uses 'Firework' in Iran Strikes Video: 'I Am Deeply Appalled'

Pop singer Katy Perry expressed strong disapproval after the Trump White House used her 2010 song 'Firework' as background music in a TikTok video depicting Iranian military strikes. Perry stated she was neither consulted nor approved of the usage, calling it a violation of the song's intended message of hope and unity. The White House's TikTok post included footage of bombings and was captioned 'Iran has been warned,' along with a fireworks emoji. This incident follows similar controversies where other artists, such as Olivia Rodrigo, have criticized the White House for using their music in politically charged content. Perry, who has historically opposed Trump and supported his rivals, emphasized that her music aims to bring people together rather than promote violence.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy around the White House's use of music in political messaging, highlighting the backlash from artists like Katy Perry and Olivia Rodrigo. It emphasizes the political implications of using popular songs in contexts related to military actions and policies, which is a

Why factuality (80): The article confirms Katy Perry's public reaction to the White House using her song in a military video, including her statement about the song being weaponized. It adds context about Perry's political endorsements and past controversies, which may influence readers' perception but are relevant to u

Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'freaks out,' 'deeply appalled,' and 'diatribe.' It also highlights Perry's political affiliations and past controversies, which may introduce bias. The tone leans towards portraying Perry as a victim and the White House as irresponsible, lacking

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories