Katja Kokot feels threatened in the vicinity of Natasha Sukic, who replies: If I wanted to target Mahnitch, I would also hit him

VečerIndependent🔒Center7 hr. ago

Katja Kokot, leader of the Resnica parliamentary group, claims she feels threatened by Nataša Sukič after an incident during a session of the National Assembly. Kokot alleges that Sukič threw a book at the president of the assembly, Žan Mahnič, and called for formal charges against her for alleged threats and violence. Sukič defended her actions as symbolic and non-threatening, stating that the book was meant to represent parliamentary authority and that she did not intend to harm anyone. She emphasized that the book, not any weapon, was used and that she is a pacifist. Sukič also accused Kokot of spreading hate speech through social media posts. Jelka Godec, a member of the opposition SDS, supported Kokot’s stance, arguing that throwing objects in parliament is a violent act regardless of intent.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes direct quotes from both Kokot and Sukič, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the perspectives provided. There is no clear indication of biased language or selective sourcing that歪

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenter9 hr. ago

Katja Kokot, leader of the Resica parliamentary group, accused Natasa Sukič of threatening violence during a session of the Slovenian parliament. Kokot claimed that Sukič had thrown a dictionary at the president of the assembly, Janez Mahnič, and threatened him with weapons, making her feel unsafe in the parliamentary building. Sukič defended her actions as symbolic, stating she was referring to the dictionary as a weapon of democracy, not literal violence. She denied any intent to harm anyone and called for Kokot and President of Resica Zoran Stevanović to file criminal charges against her if they felt threatened. Jelka Godec, leader of the SDS parliamentary group, supported Kokot and criticized Sukič’s behavior as unacceptable, calling for an ethical committee review of the incident.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes direct quotes from both Kokot and Sukič, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the perspectives provided. There is no clear indication of biased language or selective sourcing.