ON
← Back to feed
Karnataka High Court quashes acquisition of 1,938 acres for KHB’s housing project over proximity to elephant corridor
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressive4 hr. ago

Karnataka High Court quashes acquisition of 1,938 acres for KHB’s housing project over proximity to elephant corridor

The Karnataka High Court has overturned the acquisition of 1,938 acres of land for the Karnataka Housing Board’s Suryanagar 4th phase housing project, citing environmental concerns. The court ruled that the land is located within the proposed eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of Bannerghatta National Park and adjacent to critical elephant corridors, making the project environmentally harmful. The decision came after a Division Bench, consisting of Justices D.K. Singh and H. Shanthi Bhushan, rejected a previous ruling that had allowed partial acquisition under certain conditions. The court emphasized the need for comprehensive environmental assessments and highlighted the importance of ecological preservation alongside human needs. The project, which began in 2013, faced opposition from landowners who claimed it violated environmental regulations. The ESZ boundary remains under review, with the Supreme Court considering a petition challenging the reduction of the ESZ area.

1 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressive4 hr. ago
Karnataka High Court quashes acquisition of 1,938 acres for KHB’s housing project over proximity to elephant corridor

The Karnataka High Court has overturned the acquisition of 1,938 acres of land for the Karnataka Housing Board’s Suryanagar 4th phase housing project, citing environmental concerns. The court ruled that the land is located within the proposed eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of Bannerghatta National Park and adjacent to critical elephant corridors, making the project environmentally harmful. The decision came after a Division Bench, consisting of Justices D.K. Singh and H. Shanthi Bhushan, rejected a previous ruling that had allowed partial acquisition under certain conditions. The court emphasized the need for comprehensive environmental assessments and highlighted the importance of ecological preservation alongside human needs. The project, which began in 2013, faced opposition from landowners who claimed it violated environmental regulations. The ESZ boundary remains under review, with the Supreme Court considering a petition challenging the reduction of the ESZ area.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the court's decision as a victory for environmental protection and ecological balance, emphasizing the negative impacts of the housing project on wildlife and ecosystems. It highlights the legal challenges to the project and underscores the judiciary's role in safeguarding natural

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories