ON
← Back to feed
How did the Magyari manage to tear down the foundations that Orban had been building for years?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive20 hr. ago

How did the Magyari manage to tear down the foundations that Orban had been building for years?

The article discusses the rapid dismantling of the political, legal, and economic system built by Viktor Orbán over 16 years, following the election victory of Prime Minister György Matolcsy (Magyar). With a two-thirds majority in parliament, Magyar has the power to amend the constitution and enact laws governing state institutions. He immediately demanded the resignation of President Tamás Sulyok and other high-ranking officials, stating they should step down voluntarily rather than being replaced by his administration. Since taking office in May, key pillars of Orbán’s system have been weakened, including the removal of the president and chief prosecutor, as well as the decline of the once-powerful media apparatus. The 'national cooperation system' established by Orbán after his 2010 electoral win has been criticized as a centralized political and economic model aimed at reinforcing his version of 'illiberal democracy.' Analysts note that democratic checks and balances were undermined through appointments of loyalists to key positions and state-controlled media promoting government narratives. Magyar’s promise to dismantle this system was a major campaign pledge, reflecting voter

Magyar’s victory in the Hungarian parliamentary elections has triggered the collapse of the political, legal, and economic system that Prime Minister Viktor Orbán had spent over 16 years building to maintain his ruling party, Fidesz, in power. His decisive win has granted him a two-thirds majority in parliament, empowering him to amend the constitution and enact key laws governing state institutions. This newfound authority allows Magyar to reshape legislation with minimal resistance, marking a pivotal shift in Hungary's governance structure. The fall began shortly after the election results were announced. Within months, critical pillars of Orbán’s regime started to crumble. President Tamas Sulyok, along with other high-ranking officials, resigned, many under pressure from the new government. Magyar publicly demanded their immediate departure, stating, “They should resign themselves. We won’t replace them.” The media landscape, once a powerful tool for Orbán’s narrative, has also weakened, with major outlets losing influence and control shifting toward more independent platforms. Orbán’s tenure since 2010 saw the establishment of what he called the National Cooperation System (NER), a framework he framed as a social contract. Critics, however, viewed it as a centralized political and economic system designed to consolidate Orbán’s version of “illiberal democracy.” Political analyst Szabolcs Dull compared this system to a game where one player could change the rules at will. Orbán relied heavily on his parliamentary majority to pass laws swiftly, but starting in 2020, his rule became increasingly dependent on emergency decrees, first due to the coronavirus pandemic, then under the guise of war in Ukraine. Democratic oversight mechanisms were systematically weakened through appointments of loyal supporters to key institutional positions. State-controlled media, including the public broadcaster MTVA and around 500 affiliated media houses under the KESMA media holding, played a crucial role in promoting the government’s agenda. Dull noted that the promise of dissolving the NER and removing its representatives became Magyar’s most popular pre-election pledge. “This is what voters now expect from him,” he remarked. Among the first major departures from Orbán’s inner circle was President Tamas Sulyok, who stepped down mid-July following constitutional amendments that ended his mandate. These changes also limited the terms of MPs to a maximum of 12 years and introduced a retirement age of 70 for constitutional court judges. As a result, long-time ally Peter Polt, the president of the Constitutional Court, also resigned. Magyar’s administration has replaced several key figures, including the heads of four intelligence agencies, the head of the counterterrorism unit TEK János Hajdu, former press secretary Bertalan Havas, and the director of the national audit office. The office of the National Sovereignty Protection Agency, which had been criticized by the European Commission for its control over media and non-governmental organizations, has also been abolished. In June, Chief Prosecutor Gábor Balint Nagy resigned, citing concerns that the prosecutor’s office had become a political instrument rather than an impartial institution. In July, the Hungarian Parliament established an anti-corruption agency tasked with investigating alleged corruption cases from Orbán’s era. Hungary has long struggled with corruption issues, with close associates of Orbán among the largest recipients of state contracts. Notable figures include Lorinc Meszaros, a billionaire friend from Orbán’s childhood, Istvan Tiborcz, his son-in-law, and Gyozo Orban, his father. At the center of attention is the so-called Matolcsy affair, linked to the suspected disappearance of approximately 1.38 billion euros from the Hungarian Central Bank. Meanwhile, Hungary is poised to join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, a move that would enable broader investigations into financial misconduct.

2 reports

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
How did the Magyari manage to tear down the foundations that Orban had been building for years?

The article discusses the rapid dismantling of the political, legal, and economic system built by Viktor Orbán over 16 years, following the election victory of Prime Minister György Matolcsy (Magyar). With a two-thirds majority in parliament, Magyar has the power to amend the constitution and enact laws governing state institutions. He immediately demanded the resignation of President Tamás Sulyok and other high-ranking officials, stating they should step down voluntarily rather than being replaced by his administration. Since taking office in May, key pillars of Orbán’s system have been weakened, including the removal of the president and chief prosecutor, as well as the decline of the once-powerful media apparatus. The 'national cooperation system' established by Orbán after his 2010 electoral win has been criticized as a centralized political and economic model aimed at reinforcing his version of 'illiberal democracy.' Analysts note that democratic checks and balances were undermined through appointments of loyalists to key positions and state-controlled media promoting government narratives. Magyar’s promise to dismantle this system was a major campaign pledge, reflecting voter

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the political changes in Hungary, discussing both the dismantling of Orbán's system and the new policies under Magyar. It includes perspectives from analysts and outlines the actions taken by the new government without overtly favoring one side.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the political developments following the Hungarian parliamentary elections, citing the collapse of Orban's system as a result of Magyar's victory. It references the 'national cooperation system' (NER) established by Orban in 2010 and describes its implications. While there is

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards critical analysis of Orban's regime, particularly through the lens of political analysts like Szabolcs Dull. The article presents the situation from a perspective that suggests a decline in democratic norms, which may reflect a particular ideological stance rather than an enti

Mladina logoMladinaIndependentProgressive20 hr. ago
Pressure and Censorship

A group of journalists from Hungary's state news agency MTI has documented over ten years of pressure and censorship they faced during the tenure of former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. The journalists compiled evidence including correspondence, emails, and messages, alleging systematic manipulation of news and censorship under Orbán’s government. This documentation was submitted to the national association of public broadcasters, MTVA, which announced an investigation into these claims. Meanwhile, Bertalan Havasi, director of communications for Orbán’s Fidesz party, denied allegations of government control over MTI, stating that all requests were in line with laws and journalistic ethics. Hungarian Prime Minister Peter Magyar, who led his party Tisza to victory in recent parliamentary elections, has advocated for reforms, including the independence of state media.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of media freedom and government interference as a significant concern, highlighting systemic pressures and censorship by the previous administration. It emphasizes the role of independent journalists and the need for institutional oversight, aligning more closely with a左

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories