Chancellor Merz Concedes on Economic Priorities Amid Rising Political Tensions Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz has outlined his economic priorities for the remainder of the year during his summer press conference, acknowledging that he has had to make compromises on certain policies. By the end of the year, Merz aims to establish a new foundation for the pension system and significantly reduce corporate documentation requirements. However, these measures come at a cost, higher contribution rates for retirees, which will initially place additional financial strain on businesses and individuals. For the business sector, the pension reform means higher contribution rates, which Merz admits will continue to rise. While he hopes that the planned partial capitalization of pensions will eventually ease the demographic burden on companies, the immediate impact will likely be felt more acutely. Merz also acknowledged that high labor costs are already creating a competitive disadvantage, though he has conceded that reducing them further is beyond his current capabilities. Merz’s stance reflects a broader shift in his approach to governance. He has increasingly drawn clear boundaries around his authority, emphasizing that businesses will benefit from clearer regulatory frameworks. Yet, he warns that these changes could lead to more companies relocating operations outside Germany, exacerbating concerns over economic stability and competitiveness. --- Political Challenges and Public Discontent Despite Merz’s efforts to project confidence, his approval ratings remain low. According to recent surveys, only between 13% and 20% of Germans express satisfaction with the performance of his conservative-social democratic coalition. This dissatisfaction stems from a combination of factors, including perceived failures in addressing economic stagnation, rising living costs, and the growing influence of far-right parties like the AfD. During the press conference, Merz attempted to reassure the public that his coalition had “found its footing” and that progress had been made on key reforms in pensions, healthcare, and taxation. He emphasized that the government had “delivered,” despite ongoing criticism. Nevertheless, critics argue that the reforms, while politically necessary, disproportionately affect lower-income workers and middle-class families. Merz also faced direct questions about the AfD, which currently leads in the polls ahead of upcoming regional elections in eastern Germany. Though he initially avoided answering, he later addressed voters in Saxony-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, urging them to rely on official government information rather than social media. He warned against the dangers of allowing far-right ideologies to gain traction in a country with a painful history of extremism. --- Controversies and Legal Implications Meanwhile, comedian Uwe Steimle, known for his satirical commentary on politics, has sparked controversy after making provocative remarks about Chancellor Merz and former Chancellor Angela Merkel during an AfD event. Steimle compared Merz to Claus von Stauffenberg, a World War II resistance figure, suggesting that Merz lacked the courage to act decisively. He also joked about hanging Merkel, referencing her portrait in the chancellery. These comments led to legal action, with prosecutors in Dessau-Roßlau launching investigations under Paragraph 126 of the German Criminal Code, which prohibits threats of criminal acts. Steimle’s statements have been condemned by both family members of Stauffenberg and members of the AfD itself. Some within the party have distanced themselves from his remarks, arguing that they undermine the credibility of the movement. Steimle’s actions highlight the polarized climate in eastern Germany, where nostalgia for the pre-unification era often intersects with far-right rhetoric. His comments, while framed as humor, have raised serious concerns about the potential normalization of extremist views among segments of the population. --- International Context and Domestic Concerns Merz also addressed international developments, particularly the United States’ proposed $5 million grant program aimed at supporting groups aligned with the AfD. He rejected the initiative, stating that Germany would not allow foreign interference in its electoral process. He reiterated that financing political parties from abroad is illegal, reinforcing his commitment to maintaining national sovereignty in matters of governance. Domestically, Merz acknowledged that Germany’s infrastructure, societal polarization, and weak economy remain pressing challenges. While he expressed optimism about the government’s ability to stabilize the situation, he admitted that much work remains to be done. The economic recovery, he noted, is still lagging behind expectations, and the government must continue to prioritize growth and stability. --- Coalition Dynamics and Policy Conflicts Within the ruling coalition, tensions persist, particularly regarding labor law reforms. Merz has pushed for legislation that would apply to non-unionized firms, a move that has drawn opposition from the SPD. The disagreement underscores the difficulty of balancing economic liberalization with social protections, a challenge that has defined much of Merz’s tenure. Despite these internal struggles, Merz has maintained a relatively calm public demeanor, avoiding personal attacks and focusing instead on policy outcomes. His approach contrasts with earlier criticisms that he had failed to manage the coalition effectively. With the upcoming regional elections, however, the pressure to deliver tangible results continues to mount. --- Looking Ahead: Uncertain Path Forward As the political landscape becomes increasingly volatile, Merz faces mounting scrutiny over his handling of both domestic and external pressures. Whether his economic reforms can alleviate public discontent or whether the AfD’s growing influence will force him to adopt more radical positions remains uncertain. For now, the chancellor continues to emphasize stability, hoping that his coalition can navigate the complex challenges ahead without further fracturing.
15 reports
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 852 days agoThe article discusses the shift in stance of German satirical comedian Uwe Steimle, who once identified as left-wing but has now aligned himself with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD). It highlights his participation in an AfD campaign event where he performed the DDR National Anthem and made controversial remarks referencing historical figures like Stauffenberg. The piece critiques the growing influence of right-wing politics in Eastern Germany, linking it to nostalgic feelings for the former East Germany. Steimle’s past work, including his portrayal of East German leader Erich Honecker, is noted as having resonated with many East Germans during the post-Mauerfall era. The article uses the term 'Wendehals'—meaning a person who changes their position—to describe Steimle’s shifting political alignment.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Steimle’s shift toward AfD as a betrayal of his earlier leftist identity and criticizes the rise of right-wing populism in Eastern Germany. While it acknowledges the complexity of political positioning, the emphasis on the 'Wendehals' label and the critique of right-wing nostalgia
Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source, providing detailed information about the legal proceedings against Steimle, including the specific quotes and the charges under Paragraph 126 of the Criminal Code. It accurately reflects the events described in the primary source.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts without overtly taking sides. It avoids emotionally charged language and sticks to the reported events, making it highly objective.
BildIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 702 days agoThe article reports on a statement made by comedian Uwe Steimle regarding Chancellor Angela Merkel. In the piece, Steimle suggests that Merkel should be 'put against the wall,' which is a metaphorical expression often used to indicate criticism or a call for accountability. The statement reflects a critical perspective toward Merkel, likely referencing her leadership during specific political developments. The article presents this comment without additional context or explanation, focusing solely on the quote itself.
Bias read (Progressive): The framing of the article centers on a comedian’s critical remark about a prominent political figure, which implies a left-leaning critique of Merkel's leadership. While the statement itself is provocative, the article does not provide balanced perspectives or counterarguments, suggesting a leaning
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Steimle’s comments about Angela Merkel, including the quote 'Stellen wir sie an die Wand,' which matches the primary source. It also mentions the legal action by the prosecutor’s office, aligning closely with the facts presented in the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the information objectively, there is a slight emphasis on the controversy surrounding Steimle’s remarks, which could be seen as leaning toward a more critical stance. However, it remains largely neutral in its reporting.
Die ZeitIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 802 days agoKabarettist Uwe Steimle steht unter Verdacht, während einer Veranstaltung der AfD über Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz und ehemalige Kanzlerin Angela Merkel gewitzelt zu haben. Die Staatsanwaltschaft Dessau-Roßlau hat Ermittlungen eingeleitet, da seine Aussagen als Androhung von Straftaten interpretiert wurden. Steimle verglich Merz mit dem nationalsozialistischen Diktator Adolf Hitler und erwähnte, dass Merkel möglicherweise aufgrund ihrer Position 'sitzen' würde. Der Enkel von Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, der für einen Attentatsversuch gegen Hitler bekannt ist, kritisierte Steimles Äußerungen als Geschichtsklitterung und Verharmlosung des Dritten Reichs. Beide AfD-Funktionäre, Tino Chrupalla und Ulrich Siegmund, nahmen Steimles Äußerungen kommentarlos hin.
Bias read (Progressive): Die Berichterstattung betont die politische Kontroverse um Steimles Äußerungen, insbesondere den Vergleich zwischen Merz und Hitler, und zitiert die Reaktionen von Stauffenberg-Enkel, der die Äußerungen als geschichtsverfälschend bezeichnet. Die Ermittlungen werden als rechtliche Konsequenz dargestl
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the legal action against Steimle, including the specific quotes and the charges. It references the primary source and corroborates the information provided, maintaining a high level of factual consistency.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is generally neutral, though there is a slight emphasis on the seriousness of the situation, which might suggest a more cautious or formal approach. However, this does not significantly detract from the objectivity of the report.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7010 days ago Mathias Döpfner and Friedrich Merz: Increased The article discusses a claim made by the new political podcast 'Wenn Sie wüssten...' that Mathias Döpfner, CEO and co-owner of the Springer Publishing Group, allegedly threatened Chancellor Friedrich Merz during a private conversation. The alleged threat occurred after Merz repeatedly refused to form a coalition with or tolerate an AfD minority government. According to the podcast, Merz reportedly said, 'Only over my dead body,' reinforcing his stance against such a scenario. Döpfner was reportedly upset by this, which may have intensified Merz’s perception of a journalistic threat. The Springer publishing group owns influential newspapers like Bild and Welt, whose editorial lines significantly shape public opinion about the government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the claims made by the podcast without taking a clear stance or providing additional context beyond the reported statements. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a leaning toward either side of the political spectrum.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on allegations that Mathias Döpfner allegedly threatened Chancellor Angela Merkel during a conversation with Friedrich Merz. It references a political podcast as the source of the claim and provides context about the potential implications of such a statement. While no primary so
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the alleged statements but frames them within the context of political tensions and media influence. There is some editorializing in describing the significance of the situation, particularly regarding the role of Springer publications in shaping public opinion. This introduces
Deutsche Welle (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 652 days agoChancellor Friedrich Merz addressed journalists during his annual summer press conference, emphasizing that his coalition government has 'found its footing' despite low approval ratings. He highlighted recent reforms in pensions, healthcare, and taxes, noting that these measures align with practices in other European countries. When questioned about the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which leads in polls ahead of September state elections, Merz urged voters to rely on official information rather than social media. He expressed confidence in preventing AfD from gaining significant influence, particularly in eastern German states. The article also mentions a new report supporting a potential ban on the AfD.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue—far-right politics in Germany—the framing appears balanced. Merz is portrayed as addressing concerns without overtly attacking the AfD, and the focus is on his government's policies and efforts to counter extremism. There is no clear leaning,
Why factuality (85): This article focuses on Chancellor Merz's press conference and his efforts to address concerns about the AfD, but it does not mention the legal action against Uwe Steimle or the specific remarks made by Steimle during the AfD event. It provides information about Merz's policies and political strateg
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat supportive of Merz and critical of the AfD, though not overtly biased. The article frames the discussion around Merz’s attempts to engage with AfD voters, which could be seen as subtly favoring the mainstream political parties over the AfD.
Deutsche Welle (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 652 days ago German Chancellor Friedrich Merz makes appeal to AfD votersGerman Chancellor Friedrich Merz addressed journalists during his annual summer press conference, emphasizing that his coalition government has 'found its footing' despite low approval ratings. He highlighted proposed reforms to pensions, healthcare, and taxes, noting that while similar measures were implemented decades ago in other European countries, Germany is now beginning such changes. Journalists primarily focused on the Alternative for Germany (AfD), a far-right party leading in polls ahead of state elections in eastern Germany. Merz acknowledged the threat posed by the AfD but avoided direct confrontation, urging citizens to rely on official information rather than social media. He expressed confidence in preventing the AfD from gaining significant influence in upcoming elections, though he did not address criticisms of U.S. policy directly.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue—potential rise of the far-right AfD—the framing remains balanced. Merz avoids overtly attacking the AfD, instead focusing on promoting government policies and encouraging informed citizenry. There is no clear ideological slant in the language
Why factuality (85): Similar to item 0, this article discusses Merz's press conference and his response to the AfD issue but omits any reference to the legal proceedings against Steimle or the specific content of his remarks. It focuses on policy discussions and political strategies rather than the core event detailed i
Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a similar tone to item 0, presenting Merz as proactive while implying potential challenges from the AfD. This subtle framing may lean slightly towards supporting the mainstream political establishment.
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 602 days ago Friedrich Merz's summer press conference: After all, he did not insult anyoneThe article discusses Chancellor Friedrich Merz's summer press conference, highlighting his apparent calmness despite ongoing criticism of his leadership. It notes that Merz has avoided publicly insulting any groups, including asylum seekers or workers, which contrasts with past behavior. The piece critiques Merz's governance style, calling it a 'toxic mix' of unrealistic promises and poor administrative skills, leading to low approval ratings. While Merz claims satisfaction with recent compromises in social reforms, these reforms are described as economically liberal and detrimental to lower-middle-class citizens. The article also criticizes Merz's stance on climate protection and his reluctance to address it seriously, while praising his refusal to open the door to the AfD.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Chancellor Merz's policies as neoliberal and socially harmful, particularly emphasizing the negative impact on lower-income groups. It uses critical language such as 'toxic mix,' 'ignorance,' and 'spare on costs of the poor,' which align with left-leaning perspectives. The tone is
Why factuality (85): The article discusses Friedrich Merz’s summer press conference but does not mention the legal action against Uwe Steimle. It focuses on Merz’s political performance and public perception, which is unrelated to the primary source document. While the content is factually accurate regarding Merz’s stat
Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical of Merz’s leadership style and his political strategies, suggesting a negative bias towards him. The article frames his actions in a way that implies dissatisfaction among the public, which may reflect a partisan perspective rather than a neutral analysis.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 65yesterdayThe article discusses a controversial joke made by comedian Uwe Steimle during an event organized by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in Dessau. Steimle compared Chancellor Friedrich Merz to Adolf Hitler and suggested former Chancellor Angela Merkel should be 'hung' or 'put against the wall,' referencing a portrait of her in the chancellery. These remarks sparked outrage, particularly among descendants of resistance fighters against Nazi Germany. Karl von Stauffenberg, grandson of Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg—a resistance member who assassinated Hitler—called the comparison 'historical nonsense' and accused it of trivializing the Third Reich. The local prosecutor’s office in Dessau has launched an investigation into Steimle for threatening public order through the implied threat of criminal acts. The article highlights the tension between satire and historical sensitivity, as well as the broader political implications of such rhetoric.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Steimle's remarks as a serious violation of historical sensitivities, emphasizing the potential legal consequences and the moral weight of comparing political figures to Nazi leaders. While it presents both perspectives (Steimle's defense as humor and Stauff
Why factuality (80): The article provides background on Steimle’s career and his recent involvement with the AfD, which is consistent with the primary source. However, it includes some contextual details not directly mentioned in the primary source, such as his past work and political evolution, which may slightly reduc
Why objectivity (65): The tone suggests a somewhat critical view of Steimle’s shift in political alignment, implying a judgment on his change in stance. This introduces a subtle subjective element, though the overall reporting remains relatively balanced.
Deutsche Welle (Deutsch)State / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 552 days ago Chancellor Merz is addressing AfD voters: "Look carefully!"German Chancellor Friedrich Merz addressed journalists during his annual summer press conference, emphasizing the positive progress of his coalition government despite low approval ratings. He highlighted planned reforms in pensions, healthcare, and taxes, which have yet to be approved by Parliament. When questioned about the rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in eastern German states, Merz directly appealed to voters in Saxony-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, urging them to look beyond social media misinformation and consider the government's efforts. Merz expressed confidence in preventing the AfD from gaining power in the upcoming state elections in September, particularly in the eastern regions and Berlin.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Merz's statements neutrally, including both his defense of the government's policies and his direct appeal to voters regarding the AfD. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains balanced between Merz's perspective and a
Why factuality (60): This article primarily focuses on Merz’s speech and does not address the legal action against Steimle. It contains incomplete information and appears to be cut off mid-sentence, reducing its factual value in relation to the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The tone is focused on Merz’s political strategy and response to the AfD, which suggests a biased or agenda-driven narrative. The lack of coverage on Steimle’s case further indicates a limited scope and potential partiality.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 552 days ago Government priorities: where Merz has capitulatedThe article discusses Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s priorities for the autumn, focusing on two main economic policies: reforming the pension system and reducing corporate documentation requirements by year-end. The pension reform would initially lead to higher contribution rates for businesses but could reduce demographic burdens in the medium term through partial capital coverage. Merz has acknowledged that high labor-related costs are already a competitiveness issue but has backed down on efforts to lower these costs, which were previously raised by his coalition. He now sees preventing further increases in health and nursing insurance contributions as a success. Merz outlines the limits of his power, noting that while companies gain clearer cost structures for location decisions, this might lead to more companies choosing locations outside Germany.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Merz's policy goals and their implications objectively, acknowledging both challenges and limitations without overtly favoring any side. It includes balanced perspectives on potential outcomes and does not employ biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (60): This article primarily discusses economic policy and the government's priorities, focusing on Merz's stance on pension reform and business regulations. It does not mention the legal action against Steimle or the AfD event itself, making it largely unrelated to the primary source document. The lack o
Why objectivity (55): The tone is more critical of Merz's leadership and highlights internal struggles within the coalition. While not overtly partisan, the focus on economic issues and political challenges suggests a bias towards skepticism of Merz's governance.
Die WeltIndependent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 552 days agoThe article discusses Friedrich Merz's comments on recent eastern elections, reforms, and his views on the AfD. Merz reflects on past opportunities for reform, suggesting that certain changes could have been implemented 30 years ago. He addresses the current political landscape in the east, emphasizing the need for continued reform efforts. His remarks touch on the challenges faced by the region and the role of political parties like the AfD in shaping the discourse. The piece highlights Merz's perspective on Germany's ongoing political and social developments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Friedrich Merz's opinions on political issues such as elections, reforms, and the AfD, but does not exhibit a clear ideological slant. It reports on his reflections without overtly favoring one side over another, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (60): The article is incomplete and appears to be cut off, focusing only on Merz’s statements about the AfD and reforms. It does not provide any information related to the legal action against Steimle, thus lacking relevance to the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The tone is centered around Merz’s political position and his views on the AfD, indicating a possible bias towards his perspective. The absence of discussion on Steimle’s case suggests a lack of balance in the reporting.
n-tvIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 552 days agoThe Springer-Verlag has confirmed that there were discussions between CEO Frank Döpfner and AfD leader Friedrich Merz, but the company denies any wrongdoing. The confirmation comes amid allegations that the talks could imply some form of collaboration or influence between Springer-Verlag and the AfD. However, Springer-Verlag explicitly rejects these accusations, emphasizing that the conversations do not suggest any improper conduct or alignment with the AfD. This development has sparked further debate regarding potential ties between major media companies and politically controversial groups.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual confirmation of discussions between two individuals without overtly favoring either side. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The content remains focused on confirming the existence of the談
Why factuality (60): Similar to item 5, this article is incomplete and focuses on discussions between Merz and media figures. It does not reference the legal action against Steimle, making it irrelevant to the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The tone is focused on the political interactions involving Merz, which may imply a particular viewpoint. The lack of coverage on Steimle’s case suggests a lack of neutrality in the reporting.
n-tvIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 553 days ago "Eclat behind closed doors: Springer-Verlag confirms conversations between Döpfner and Merz on the AfD"The article reports that the Springer-Verlag publishing house has confirmed discussions between Axel Döpfner, CEO of the Springer Group, and Friedrich Merz, leader of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, regarding potential collaboration. The report highlights the controversy surrounding these private talks, which took place behind closed doors. The AfD is a far-right political party known for its anti-immigration stance and nationalist rhetoric. The involvement of a major media group like Springer in such discussions has raised questions about media independence and potential influence over political discourse.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the confirmation of private discussions without overtly endorsing or criticizing either party. It focuses on the fact that the talks occurred behind closed doors, suggesting a lack of transparency rather than taking a clear ideological stance. There is no evident slant toward a左
Why factuality (60): This article discusses Merz’s political strategy and the rise of the AfD, but it does not mention the legal action against Steimle. It is focused on broader political trends and does not align with the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The tone is critical of the AfD and suggests a negative stance towards its growing influence. The lack of coverage on Steimle’s case indicates a potential bias in the reporting.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒ProgressiveFactual 60Objective 558 days ago Government Merz: Did anyone really believe that the AfD would be cut in half?The article by Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) questions whether any politician, including former Chancellor Friedrich Merz, truly believed that reducing the strength of the AfD (Alternative for Germany) was possible. It frames the rise of the AfD as part of a broader reactionary movement following decades of leftist political shifts, suggesting that such movements cannot simply be 'small-reigned' through economic growth or minor border controls. The piece draws parallels between the AfD’s appeal and the rise of figures like Donald Trump, arguing that both reflect a desire for a return to traditional values and a rejection of perceived overreach in modern politics. The author critiques Merz’s efforts to counter the AfD, likening them to futile attempts to hold back a flood with small tools, while highlighting the deep societal tensions around migration, gender norms, and cultural identity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD’s rise as a reaction to progressive policies and suggests that its support stems from a longing for a 'traditional world.' While not explicitly endorsing the AfD, it implies that their base has legitimate concerns about social changes, which aligns more with left-leaning (
Why factuality (60): This article is focused on Merz’s political ideology and the broader context of right-wing movements, but it does not discuss the legal action against Steimle. It is therefore not aligned with the primary source.
Why objectivity (55): The tone is analytical and leans towards a critique of the political landscape, particularly the rise of the AfD. The lack of focus on Steimle’s case suggests a lack of balance in the reporting.
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 502 days ago Chancellor's summer press conference: his weakest moment?At his traditional summer press conference, Chancellor Friedrich Merz attempted to project confidence despite poor polling numbers. The event focused heavily on upcoming state elections in autumn and the rise of the Alternative for Germany (AfD). Merz acknowledged some successes of the coalition government but admitted Germany still has much work to do economically. He emphasized cooperation with the SPD, particularly regarding defense capabilities and reforms to pension insurance and bureaucracy. However, he appeared more reserved compared to previous years, possibly due to ongoing challenges within the coalition.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of Merz’s press conference, highlighting both his attempts to project confidence and the underlying challenges faced by his government. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing, presenting the event objectively while acknowledging the
Why factuality (50): This article centers on a claimed confrontation between Merz and Mathias Döpfner, discussing alleged threats and political tensions. It does not reference the legal action against Steimle or the AfD event, making it entirely disconnected from the primary source. The content is speculative and not al
Why objectivity (50): The article presents a narrative that appears to be based on unverified claims and potentially sensationalized reporting. The tone leans towards dramatization, suggesting a lack of neutrality and possible editorial influence.
Germany
