ON
← Back to feed
The South Koreans are studying Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night, what does it depict?
Slovenia🎭 Culture

The South Koreans are studying Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night, what does it depict?

South Korean researchers from SLLAB and Kyung Hee University suggest that Vincent van Gogh’s painting 'The Starry Night' depicts the actual night sky observed on July 22, 1889, rather than being purely imaginative. By using astronomical simulations and historical records, the team identified the Pleiades star cluster, Venus, and a crescent moon in their positions visible during the early morning hours of that date. This finding challenges previous art historical consensus, which placed the painting's creation in mid-June 1889 based on a letter Van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo. However, the moon was nearly full in June, whereas the painting features a crescent shape that aligns with late July observations. While the study questions the traditional timeline, scientists caution that Van Gogh was an artist who adapted motifs to his style and emotional experience, meaning the findings do not provide definitive proof of the exact creation date.

South Korean astronomers have concluded that Vincent van Gogh likely painted The Starry Night based on the actual night sky over southern France around July 22, 1889. This finding challenges the long-held belief among art historians that the masterpiece was created in June of that year. The research, published in the scientific journal Scientific Reports, utilizes astronomical simulations and historical records to suggest the painting depicts real celestial arrangements rather than purely imaginative elements. The study was led by Elijah Jeong-hyun Kim, a director at a Seoul-based telescope manufacturing firm and a doctoral student at Kyung Hee University. His team included researchers from the space technology company SLLAB. Kim initiated the investigation because he doubted previous interpretations identifying the Aries constellation in the artwork. He argued that the stars comprising Aries are relatively faint and unlikely to inspire such a vivid depiction for an observer. Suspecting the painting might instead feature the Pleiades star cluster within the constellation Taurus, the team began verifying astronomical conditions corresponding to the painting’s creation. Art historians have traditionally dated The Starry Night to mid-June 1889. This dating relies primarily on letters Van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo around June 18, in which he mentioned a new study of the starry sky. However, the new research points to inconsistencies between this timeline and the visual evidence in the canvas. In mid-June 1889, the moon was nearly full, whereas Van Gogh depicted it as a thin crescent. Furthermore, the specific arrangement of bright stars visible before dawn in June does not align with the patterns shown in the painting. To test these hypotheses, the researchers reconstructed the sky over Saint-Rémy-de-Provence using astronomical software. They focused on the area southwest of the asylum where Van Gogh resided during his recovery from mental health crises. The team determined that the predawn sky on July 22, 1889, offers the closest match to the artwork. On that date, a thin lunar crescent, the planet Venus, and the Hyades star cluster were visible in positions consistent with the painting. Weather analysis indicated clear skies, allowing for observation. Kim visited Saint-Rémy in 2019, traveling there in mid-June and again around July 22. He noted distinct differences in the visibility of bright stars between the two periods, observing prominent stars in July that were absent during his June visit. The team employed a mathematical method to compare the distribution of five prominent stars in the center of the painting against known stellar clusters. This technique accounts for variations in size, position, and rotation, enabling a comparison of point distributions regardless of artistic stylization. The alignment with the Hyades cluster, which forms a distinctive V-shape, proved compelling. The researchers applied a similar methodology to Van Gogh’s 1888 painting Café Terrace at Night, where they identified the pattern of the Summer Triangle. Despite the strong correlations, scientists caution that the findings remain a hypothesis rather than definitive proof. Van Gogh was not a photographic recorder of nature but an artist who adapted motifs to fit his style and emotional experience. José Luis Aragón, a physicist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico who studies the painting but was not part of this team, noted that while the study offers a careful interdisciplinary approach, the moon’s appearance in mid-June indeed failed to match the thin crescent in the work. Aragón emphasized that Van Gogh worked in a studio within the asylum, relying on sketches and memory. Consequently, the sky in the painting may combine observations from multiple nights. Kim acknowledged that Van Gogh might have conceived the idea in June but completed the work after observing the sky in July. The Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam stated that the artist did not aim for accurate depictions of celestial bodies, meaning the positions of objects in the painting should not be taken as literal records. The research team also re-examined Van Gogh’s correspondence and historical weather logs. They found references to cicadas in the letters that support a July timeframe. Additionally, their analysis suggests that a seizure often associated with that period may have occurred later than previously thought, potentially extending the window during which Van Gogh could have painted. The painting itself shows a swirling night sky above a village and dark cypress silhouettes. It was created while Van Gogh was confined to the Saint-Paul psychiatric institution in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence. He had entered the facility in May 1889, following an incident where he severed part of his left ear during an argument with painter Paul Gauguin. During his stay, he was prohibited from leaving the grounds. To recreate the star-filled sky, he relied on memories of evenings in Provence. The Starry Night stands as one of his final major works, produced just before his death by suicide in 1890 at the age of 37. The MoMA in New York holds the painting and currently dates its creation to mid-June 1889. The new study implies that the artist followed the real night sky more precisely than previously assumed, despite the highly stylized representation. Kim expressed confidence in the July 22 date, stating he would bet on it, though he admitted that scenes from days immediately preceding or following that date could also have served as inspiration.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 95
Researchers have linked Van Gogh's Starry Night to the real night sky of 1889

Researchers led by Elijah Jeong-hyun Kim have proposed that Vincent van Gogh’s 'Starry Night' was painted approximately one month later than previously believed, likely around July 22, 1889, rather than June 1889. The study, published in Scientific Reports, uses astronomical calculations to reconstruct the night sky over Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, where Van Gogh stayed at the Saint-Paul psychiatric facility. The team argues that the moon phase depicted in the painting does not match conditions in mid-June 1889 but aligns closely with the thin crescent visible before dawn in late July. Kim initially questioned the traditional interpretation that the painting depicts the constellation Aries, noting that its stars are too faint to be observed easily by a layperson. Instead, he hypothesized the scene might represent the constellation Taurus, leading him to verify astronomical conditions during his visits to the site in 2019.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a scientific study regarding art history and astronomy. It is apolitical in nature, focusing on historical dating and observational evidence rather than current political debates or policy issues.

Why factuality (95): Accurately reflects the core findings of the study published in Scientific Reports, including the specific date (July 22, 1889), the location (Saint-Rémy-de-Provence), and the lead researcher (Elijah Jeong-hyun Kim). It correctly attributes the information to AP and mentions the shift from the previ

Why objectivity (95): Maintains a neutral, informative tone typical of standard news reporting. Uses objective language such as 'morda' (perhaps/maybe) when discussing the new dating, avoiding overstatement. Does not inject personal opinion or emotional bias.

Delo logoDeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 95
The South Koreans are studying Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night, what does it depict?

South Korean researchers from SLLAB and Kyung Hee University suggest that Vincent van Gogh’s painting 'The Starry Night' depicts the actual night sky observed on July 22, 1889, rather than being purely imaginative. By using astronomical simulations and historical records, the team identified the Pleiades star cluster, Venus, and a crescent moon in their positions visible during the early morning hours of that date. This finding challenges previous art historical consensus, which placed the painting's creation in mid-June 1889 based on a letter Van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo. However, the moon was nearly full in June, whereas the painting features a crescent shape that aligns with late July observations. While the study questions the traditional timeline, scientists caution that Van Gogh was an artist who adapted motifs to his style and emotional experience, meaning the findings do not provide definitive proof of the exact creation date.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a scientific study regarding art history and astronomy. It presents the findings neutrally, citing the specific research published in Scientific Reports and including caveats provided by the researchers themselves. There is no political agenda, partisan framing, or ideological

Why factuality (95): Correctly identifies the research team (SLLAB and Kyung Hee University) and the specific astronomical features identified (Hyades, Venus, crescent moon). Accurately explains the discrepancy between the previous June estimate (based on letters) and the new July finding (based on lunar phase and star

Why objectivity (95): Objective and balanced presentation. Clearly distinguishes between the new scientific findings and previous art historical assumptions. Avoids sensationalism while explaining the significance of the discovery.

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 90
The astronomers were supposed to solve the riddle. Was one of the world's most famous paintings created under different circumstances?

South Korean astronomers claim to have identified the specific night sky depicted in Vincent van Gogh's famous painting 'The Starry Night.' Using astronomical simulations, researchers from SLLAB and Kyung Hee University reconstructed the celestial positions over Saint-Rémy-de-Provence in France during the summer of 1889. Their findings suggest the star arrangement in the painting closely matches the sky visible just before sunrise on July 22, 1889. The study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, challenges previous assumptions that the artwork was primarily based on the artist's imagination or memory rather than direct observation. By comparing five prominent stars in the painting to the Hyades cluster, the team argues that Van Gogh likely captured a realistic view of the heavens while staying at a psychiatric institution.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a scientific discovery regarding art history and astronomy. It cites peer-reviewed research and uses neutral, objective language to describe the methodology and findings. There is no political controversy, partisan framing, or ideological bias present in the text.

Why factuality (90): Mostly accurate regarding the main claim (July 22, 1889) and the publication venue. However, it cites CNN as the source for the reconstruction details, whereas other sources cite AP or direct journal references. This is a minor sourcing variance but does not invalidate the facts. The description of

Why objectivity (90): Neutral tone throughout. Uses hedging language ('trdijo', 'morda') appropriately when describing the researchers' claims. Presents the information as a challenge to previous theories without taking a definitive stance beyond what the evidence supports.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories