IndiaSupreme Court judge Ujjal Bhuyan criticized the prolonged exclusion of 'distinguished jurists' from the Supreme Court bench, noting that no non-lawyer or non-high court judge has been appointed in 76 years. He argued that this constitutional provision remains unused and questioned whether the government or collegium failed to explore it adequately. Bhuyan emphasized that legal scholars, while lacking practical experience, bring valuable academic perspectives and are appointed as judges in other countries. He highlighted the need for diversity in the judiciary and suggested that such jurists could enhance the court's ability to address complex legal issues.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a constitutional oversight and criticizes the current system for excluding qualified legal scholars. The emphasis on academic contributions and criticism of the status quo aligns with progressive judicial reform advocacy, suggesting a left-leaning perspective.
