Julius Mkhwanazi and four co-accused returned to the Brakpan Magistrate’s Court on Thursday for a bail hearing in connection with the murder of Emmanuel Mbense. The five individuals, Mkhwanazi, former EMPD officer Keisha-Leigh Stols, EMPD officer Adrian MacKenzie, South African Police Service officer Bhekokwakhe Sibande, and civilian Cobus Janse van Rensburg, are facing charges of Schedule 6 murder. This classification means the prosecution opposes bail for all five, requiring them to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying their release. The matter had previously been postponed due to legal disputes over the scheduling of the case and the sufficiency of information provided by the State. The case stems from the 2022 killing of Mbense, whose body was discovered in a dam near Nigel after being tortured at his Brakpan home. His death became a focal point of the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, where evidence suggested a cover-up involving senior police officials. Testimony from witness D, Marius van der Merwe, a security company owner, implicated Mkhwanazi in orchestrating the disposal of Mbense’s body. Van der Merwe was later shot dead outside his Brakpan home on December 5, 2025, shortly after providing testimony. His account claimed that Mkhwanazi directed others to remove Mbense’s body from the scene, either to a mine dump or a river. During the recent court session, State prosecutor Nceba Ntelwa asserted that the case qualifies as Schedule 6 due to the nature of the crime, a murder committed during a robbery by a group. He emphasized that the defense bears the burden of proving exceptional circumstances for bail. However, the defense challenged this stance, arguing that the charge sheet lacked the necessary justification for Schedule 6 classification and that the State had not adequately explained its opposition to bail. Advocate Peter Wilkins, representing Mkhwanazi, contended that the allegations against his client amounted to being an accessory after the fact, which does not constitute a Schedule 6 offense. Other defense attorneys echoed similar concerns. Attorney Gerhald Nel, representing Janse van Rensburg, noted that the defense had not been given enough information to effectively prepare for the bail application. Similarly, Crystal Keevy, representing Stols and MacKenzie, stated that the lack of transparency hindered the defense’s ability to mount a proper argument. The State maintained that the defense had initially signaled readiness to proceed with the bail application but later requested additional details, including comprehensive case information and the charge sheet. These requests were made on the morning of the hearing, leaving the State insufficient time to respond appropriately. Ntelwa cited Section 60 of the Criminal Procedure Act, asserting that the State should be granted time to evaluate what information it could legally disclose to the defense. He argued that the court should not compel the State to present its case or reveal sensitive details to aid the defense in fulfilling its burden. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between the prosecution and defense regarding procedural fairness and the disclosure of critical case materials. As the court continues to deliberate, the outcome of this bail hearing will likely shape the trajectory of the trial and the broader implications for judicial processes in cases involving high-profile police personnel. Meanwhile, the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry has uncovered troubling patterns of misconduct within the police force, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal. Len John, the IPID deputy director for investigations, testified that rogue police units, operating under the guise of task teams, have been involved in extrajudicial killings targeting individuals linked to cash-in-transit robberies, taxi operators, and drug syndicates. Over 300 cases were investigated by IPID between April 2023 and May 2026, resulting in the deaths of 149 people. Many of the victims had no direct connection to the alleged crimes, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of these operations. In several instances, task teams failed to recover firearms or establish links between the deceased and the crimes they were supposedly investigating. Some victims were found at locations inconsistent with the narratives provided by task team members, suggesting potential fabrications to cover up unlawful actions.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
ZA
