The Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) has reaffirmed its confidence in former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero despite recent revelations by businessman Julio Martínez, who accused him of playing a key role in securing public funds for the airline company Plus Ultra during the pandemic. The party’s leadership, including President Cristina Narbona, has reiterated their belief in Zapatero's innocence, stating, “We continue to believe in his innocence.” This stance comes amid ongoing legal proceedings involving both Zapatero and Martínez, with the latter providing detailed accounts of alleged financial dealings tied to the rescue operation. Julio Martínez, a close associate of Zapatero and founder of the consulting firm Análisis Relevante, appeared before Judge José Luis Calama this week in Madrid. During nearly three hours of testimony, Martínez did not clarify with whom Zapatero allegedly mediated to secure the rescue of Plus Ultra nor how much money was involved. He described Zapatero as someone who “marked the steps to follow” in the efforts to save the airline, which received €53 million in public aid in 2021. However, Martínez claimed he had no direct contact with Zapatero and emphasized that he used his own companies to channel payments related to the deal. Martínez also confirmed that he received monthly payments of €3,000 from the company Whathefav, owned by Zapatero’s daughters, for marketing work that largely consisted of “beautifying reports” prepared by Análisis Relevante. These payments continued even when there was little actual work to perform. Additionally, he stated that the commission from Plus Ultra, amounting to 1% of the company’s value, was paid through multiple shell companies over time, partly due to the controversy surrounding the case. During his testimony, Martínez admitted using his own firms to facilitate the payment structure, as outlined in earlier documents submitted by the company’s president, Julio Martínez Sola. The two men have been central figures in the investigation into the rescue of Plus Ultra, which has led to charges against Zapatero for leading an organized structure aimed at illicit influence. Martínez also downplayed the significance of a meeting he had with a finance expert to formalize the creation of a new company, suggesting it played a minor role in the overall scheme. Meanwhile, the PSOE has expressed growing concern over the lack of clarity regarding Zapatero’s involvement. Several party leaders, including Andalusian vice-secretary María Márquez, have publicly called for Zapatero to explain his actions, noting that “nothing of what is being discussed has to do with the president we have known.” President Cristina Narbona, speaking in a Senate committee session, acknowledged that she still does not know the origin of the jewels valued at €1.3 million that were found in Zapatero’s office, nor does she fully understand his relationship with Martínez. She stressed that the party continues to support Zapatero’s right to presumption of innocence while acknowledging the need for judicial independence. Zapatero himself made headlines last month when he appeared before the National Court, denying any involvement in the rescue of Plus Ultra. He reiterated his claim of innocence in a statement following his testimony, saying, “I have committed no grave crimes. I always acted with decency and honesty. Now I must prove my innocence.” Despite these denials, the evidence presented by Martínez and others has cast doubt on his position, particularly given the financial ties between Zapatero and the companies linked to the rescue. The government, under pressure to maintain public support for Zapatero, has attempted to balance political loyalty with legal accountability. Officials have defended the decision to approve the rescue package, citing technical assessments and external advisory input. However, internal tensions within the PSOE remain high, especially concerning the contracts between Whathefav and other entities associated with Zapatero. As the investigation unfolds, the party will likely continue to advocate for Zapatero’s rights while awaiting further developments from the judiciary.
3 reports
El PeriódicoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterdayThe Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) continues to express confidence in former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero despite revelations made by Julio Martínez. The party maintains its belief in Zapatero's innocence regarding the allegations brought forward by Martínez. These developments come amid ongoing scrutiny and investigations into potential misconduct involving high-profile political figures. The PSOE's stance reflects its continued support for Zapatero, even in light of new information that could challenge his credibility.
Bias read (Progressive): The article discusses the PSOE, a leftist political party, maintaining its trust in Zapatero, indicating alignment with the party's perspective. The framing emphasizes the party's continued belief in Zapatero's innocence, which suggests a lack of critical examination of the allegations against him.
Why factuality (85): The article briefly states the PSOE’s continued support for Zapatero but lacks specific details about the nature of the revelations or the extent of the evidence presented. It is concise but omits some context found in other sources.
Why objectivity (70): The article is clearly biased in favor of the PSOE, emphasizing their continued trust in Zapatero without addressing opposing viewpoints or the specifics of the allegations against him.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 80yesterdayJulio Martínez, empresario y comisionista acusado en el caso Plus Ultra, no proporcionó nuevas revelaciones ante el juez durante su declaración en la Audiencia Nacional. En lugar de aclarar con quién medió José Luis Zapatero para el rescate de la aerolínea en 2021 ni cuánto cobró por ello, Martínez se limitó a describir las acciones de Zapatero como 'labores de asesoría'. Las fuentes presentes en la declaración consideraron decepcionante la falta de concreción, lo que generó irritación incluso en la fiscal. Se reveló posteriormente que la comisión repartida entre Zapatero y Martínez fue de 530.000 euros, ocultada mediante facturas inciertas. Además, Martínez confirmó que recibía una compensación de 3.000 euros mensuales por servicios de marketing para la empresa de las hijas de Zapatero, Whathefav.
Bias read (Center): La cobertura presenta hechos objetivos relacionados con el caso judicial de Plus Ultra, sin tomar partido explícito sobre la responsabilidad de los involucrados. El artículo relata las declaraciones de Julio Martínez y las respuestas del juez, manteniendo un equilibrio entre las afirmaciones del acé
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Julio Martínez's testimony before a judge regarding his alleged mediation with Zapatero for the rescue of Plus Ultra. It cites sources present at the hearing and describes the lack of clarity from Martinez. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus that Martinez d
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the events neutrally, reporting on the testimony and reactions of legal figures without apparent bias. It uses objective language and does not appear to take sides or express personal opinions about the case.
El PaísIndependent🔒Progressive5 hr. agoThe Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) is anticipating explanations from former President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, who has been under investigation for leading an illegal influence network that allegedly facilitated the rescue of 53 million euros from Plus Ultra during the pandemic. Sixty-five days after his May 19th indictment, Zapatero will undergo his first televised interview since the investigation began, though he previously appeared before a judge on June 17. Internal PSOE figures express concern over the origin of 1.3 million euros worth of jewelry stored in his office, which was located near the PSOE headquarters. The case involves additional charges including tax fraud and smuggling, adding to existing allegations of influence trafficking and money laundering. PSOE leaders like María Márquez and Cristina Narbona emphasize the need for Zapatero to clarify these matters, while acknowledging the lack of clarity regarding his connections with Julio Martínez and the consulting firm Análisis Relevante, which paid nearly a million euros between 2020 and 2025 to accounts linked to Zapatero and his daughters. Zapatero denied any involvement in the Plus Ultra rescue, but矛
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation through the lens of the PSOE, emphasizing their anticipation and demands for transparency from Zapatero, a former leader of the party. It highlights internal party concerns and calls for accountability, suggesting a left-leaning perspective by focusing on the ethical
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Spain
