ON
← Back to feed
Juliette Binoche, Javier Bardem, and Tilda Swinton. I'm not going to lie to you. Celebrities call for Lula's vote in the second round of Brazil's presidential election
France🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive

Juliette Binoche, Javier Bardem, and Tilda Swinton. I'm not going to lie to you. Celebrities call for Lula's vote in the second round of Brazil's presidential election

On October 25, 2026, Brazilian voters head to the polls for the second round of their presidential election, pitting incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva against Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro. The article reports that numerous international celebrities, primarily from the film industry, have launched a campaign urging Brazilians to support Lula. Director Kleber Mendonça Filho released a video featuring prominent figures such as Juliette Binoche, Tilda Swinton, Javier Bardem, Pedro Almodóvar, and Guillermo del Toro, all of whom gesture an 'L' shape or speak directly to the camera. Del Toro called on voters to choose freedom and progress, while actor Mark Ruffalo explicitly urged citizens to fight fascism and preserve democracy. The director noted that the video garnered over 30 million views in under 24 hours despite alleged interference by Meta in the electoral process.

Brazilian voters head to the polls this Sunday, October 25, for the decisive second round of the presidential election. International celebrities have joined a coordinated campaign urging citizens to back incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva against his far-right challenger, Flavio Bolsonaro. The two candidates remain neck and neck in recent polling data following a tightly contested first round held three weeks ago. The call to action was spearheaded by Brazilian filmmaker Kleber Mendonça Filho, who released a video on social media platforms on Friday. The clip features prominent figures from the global film industry, including French actress Juliette Binoche, Spanish director Pedro Almodóvar, Mexican director Guillermo del Toro, Spanish actor Javier Bardem, British actress Tilda Swinton, American actor Mark Ruffalo, Norwegian director Joachim Trier, French actress Julie Delpy, and Brazilian actors Wagner Moura and Fernanda Torres. In the footage, many participants form the letter "L" with their thumb and index finger, a gesture associated with Lula’s supporters. Del Toro, who resides in the United States, addressed Brazilians directly in the video. He urged them to vote to secure freedom and progress, advising them to draw lessons from current events in the northern hemisphere. Ruffalo called on viewers to fight fascism, preserve democracy, and defend the environment, specifically citing the need to keep forests intact and water clean. Almodóvar stated that Lula’s victory is essential for both Brazil and the environment. Trier described himself as a major fan of Brazil and expressed hope for a high turnout supporting the incumbent. Delpy declared her love for Brazil and urged a vote for democracy, while Binoche echoed the sentiment by calling for support of Brazilian democracy. Mendonça Filho noted that the video had garnered over 30 million views in less than 24 hours. He commented on the digital landscape, stating that Meta appears to be interfering in the electoral process. Despite these concerns, he expressed optimism about high voter participation on Sunday and thanked international friends for their interest in the outcome. Inside Brazil, cultural support has been divided along political lines. Lula has received endorsements from major musical figures such as Caetano Veloso and Anitta, alongside the aforementioned actors. Conversely, Flavio Bolsonaro has secured the backing of several sertanejo music artists, including Gusttavo Lima and Ana Castela, as well as football star Neymar. The final televised debate took place on Friday, October 23, at the studios of Globo in Rio de Janeiro, the country's highest-rated television network. This followed a tense encounter at the Band broadcaster earlier in the week. During the debate, the candidates clashed on issues of economy, security, and corruption. Lula mocked his opponent, comparing him to students who memorize information without understanding it. He accused Bolsonaro of lacking preparation and failing to know Brazil. Lula also alleged that Bolsonaro acts subserviently toward US leader Donald Trump. Flavio Bolsonaro, the eldest son of former president Jair Bolsonaro, leads the race after winning the first round on October 4. He captured 47 percent of the vote, narrowly edging out Lula, who received 45 percent. Bolsonaro’s campaign centers on a promise of change, emphasizing strict measures on public safety and liberal economic policies. His platform relies heavily on rejecting the Workers' Party (PT), which governed Brazil from 2003 to 2016 and again since 2023 under Lula. Although Jair Bolsonaro served as president from 2019 to 2022, the younger Bolsonaro positions his candidacy as a sharp break from the PT era. Environmental factors play a significant role in the election narrative. Data indicates that deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon dropped by nearly 42 percent between August 2025 and July 2026, with only 3,335 square kilometers of forest cleared. This represents the lowest level recorded since 1998. Experts attribute this decline to the strict enforcement of existing environmental laws by the Lula administration. The government has equipped agencies with resources to monitor compliance, ensuring that landowners adhere to regulations limiting deforestation to 20 percent of private property. Deforestation rates in the Cerrado region have also decreased. However, challenges persist. Pesticide contamination from agriculture remains an issue, and illegal gold mining, though reduced by 99 percent in Yanomami territories, continues elsewhere due to limited enforcement capacity. Under the previous Bolsonaro administration, deforestation peaked at 13,038 square kilometers in 2021, although this remained below historical highs such as the 29,059 square kilometers cleared in 1995. Flavio Bolsonaro has campaigned on relaxing land restrictions, telling voters that under his leadership, owners could manage their land freely. Critics warn this approach could reverse recent environmental gains. The outcome of the election will determine the future direction of Brazil’s environmental policies and its broader geopolitical stance. With both candidates statistically tied in the latest surveys, the final margin of victory is expected to be narrow. Voters will decide between the incumbent’s record of environmental regulation and social programs versus the challenger’s pledge of economic liberalism and stricter law enforcement.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 5 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

5 reports

20 Minutes logo20 MinutesIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 95
Presidential in Brazil: In the Amazon, Lula's policy on deforestation has borne fruit

Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon dropped by nearly 42 percent between August 2025 and July 2026, reaching levels unseen since 1998. This environmental improvement is attributed to President Lula’s administration, which has strictly enforced existing environmental laws after the previous government under Jair Bolsonaro had largely ignored them. The article notes that while deforestation decreased significantly, other environmental issues such as pesticide contamination persist due to the continued focus on economic growth and agribusiness. With the presidential election approaching, where Lula trails his rival Flavio Bolsonaro slightly in first-round results, the future enforcement of these protections remains uncertain. Experts argue that Brazil’s legal framework is robust but requires consistent governmental resources and will to be effective.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the reduction in deforestation primarily as a success of the current left-wing government (Lula), contrasting it negatively with the previous right-wing administration (Bolsonaro). It uses terms like 'extreme right' for the opposition and highlights the positive outcomes of Lula's

Why factuality (95): This snippet provides precise, verifiable statistics: 45% for Lula vs 47% for Flavio Bolsonaro in the first round. This level of specificity adds credibility. The description of the debate outcome (Lula finding his footing) is a subjective interpretation of the event, but it is presented as a report

Why objectivity (95): The tone is highly neutral and concise. The phrase 'retrouve du répondant' (finds his match/response) describes the dynamic of the debate without injecting moral judgment or preference for either candidate. It sticks strictly to the observable outcome of the debate and the current polling situation.

La Croix logoLa CroixParty-alignedCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
Presidential elections in Brazil: the shock therapy wanted by Flavio Bolsonaro

This analysis examines the presidential campaign of Flavio Bolsonaro, identified as the favorite candidate for the second round of Brazil's election scheduled for October 25, 2026. The article notes that Bolsonaro positions himself as an extreme-right contender promising significant change, focusing on strict security measures and liberal economic policies. His campaign strategy relies heavily on rejecting the Workers' Party (PT), led by incumbent President Lula, rather than directly contrasting his platform with his father Jair Bolsonaro's previous administration from 2019 to 2022. The piece highlights that while the PT held power from 2003 to 2016 and again since 2023, Flavio Bolsonaro frames his potential victory as a clear break from this political lineage.

Bias read (Center): The provided text is a brief analytical introduction that neutrally describes the candidates' platforms and historical context. It uses standard descriptive terms like 'extreme right' and 'liberal economic policy' without employing emotionally charged adjectives, moral judgments, or one-sided source

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The piece is framed as an analysis ('Analyse') but maintains a relatively neutral tone. It attributes positive environmental results to Lula's policy while also noting 'less rosy' aspects like pesticide contamination, providing a balanced view of the environmental record. It avoids taking a clear st

Le Point logoLe PointIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
Lula's last fight with Flavio Bolsonaro

This brief preview discusses the upcoming second round of Brazil's presidential election scheduled for October 25. It notes that incumbent President Lula was behind his opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro, in the first round held on October 4. Since then, Lula has intensified social initiatives and public appearances to rally support. Conversely, Flavio Bolsonaro has gained endorsements and improved his public image despite facing new scandal allegations. The piece frames the event as Lula's final battle against his rival.

Bias read (Progressive): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'ultimate combat' and 'final battle,' which creates a dramatic narrative favoring the incumbent. By highlighting Lula's proactive efforts ('multiplied social gestures') while attributing Bolsonaro's gains partly to external factors ('despite new'

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The tone is journalistic and descriptive. While it uses slightly evocative phrasing like 'ultimate combat' and 'scandalous affairs,' these are standard political reporting terms rather than overt editorializing. The framing presents both sides' strategies neutrally.

Le Figaro logoLe FigaroIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85
Juliette Binoche, Javier Bardem, and Tilda Swinton. I'm not going to lie to you. Celebrities call for Lula's vote in the second round of Brazil's presidential election

On October 25, 2026, Brazilian voters head to the polls for the second round of their presidential election, pitting incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva against Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro. The article reports that numerous international celebrities, primarily from the film industry, have launched a campaign urging Brazilians to support Lula. Director Kleber Mendonça Filho released a video featuring prominent figures such as Juliette Binoche, Tilda Swinton, Javier Bardem, Pedro Almodóvar, and Guillermo del Toro, all of whom gesture an 'L' shape or speak directly to the camera. Del Toro called on voters to choose freedom and progress, while actor Mark Ruffalo explicitly urged citizens to fight fascism and preserve democracy. The director noted that the video garnered over 30 million views in under 24 hours despite alleged interference by Meta in the electoral process.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the election through the lens of a celebrity endorsement campaign for the left-wing candidate, Lula. It uses loaded descriptors for the opponent, labeling Flávio Bolsonaro as an 'extreme right' candidate and his father as an 'extreme right' leader. Quotes from celebrities are used

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (85): The article focuses specifically on the celebrity endorsement angle. By highlighting only the pro-Lula celebrities and quoting the director's critical stance on Meta, it creates a somewhat one-sided impression of the event (focusing on the 'support' aspect rather than the broader election). However,

Libération logoLibérationIndependentCenter
Presidential elections in Brazil: Lula finds the answer to Flávio Bolsonaro

The final debate of the Brazilian presidential election took place on Friday, October 23, providing a momentary reprieve for the incumbent candidate who appeared more comfortable facing attacks from his opponent. The two candidates remain neck-and-neck in support levels ahead of the Sunday vote.

Bias read (Center): The provided text is a brief, neutral teaser describing the outcome of a political debate and current polling status. It uses objective language such as 'neck-and-neck' and does not employ loaded terms, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a specific ideological lean.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories