‘Can't gag Parliament or ignore youth’: CJP's Saurav Das slams disallowing of questions on NEET protests in Lok SabhaThe Chief Spokesperson of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) - CJP, Saurav Das, criticized the Indian government for blocking three parliamentary questions related to the NEET exam controversies and student protests. The questions, raised by Lok Sabha MP Matheswaran VS, sought information on refunding NEET application fees, public distrust in governance, and conditions faced by protesters. Das accused the Union government of suppressing legitimate parliamentary scrutiny, citing Rule 41(2) as justification. He questioned the absence of Home Minister Amit Shah during critical parliamentary sessions and emphasized the importance of holding the government accountable. The protests, which began over alleged irregularities in the NEET exam, lasted several weeks at Jantar Mantar before concluding with negotiations leading to the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the suppression of parliamentary questions as an attempt to silence dissent and undermine democratic accountability. It emphasizes the legitimacy of the CJP's demands and criticizes the government's actions as authoritarian. The language used suggests a left-leaning perspective by
Why factuality (85): The article reports statements made by CJP's Saurav Das regarding the disallowance of questions in the Lok Sabha related to NEET protests. It references multiple sources including Reuters and provides context about the ongoing protests and political tensions. While there is no primary source documen
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the perspective of CJP's spokesperson with a somewhat critical tone towards the Union government and Home Minister Amit Shah. There is a clear narrative supporting the CJP's position, which may introduce bias. The language used suggests a particular viewpoint rather than present
The HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 78Objective 827 days agoCandidates appearing for the Bombay High Court clerk recruitment typing test in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar protested on August 16, 2026, citing technical failures and server glitches during the online exam. CJP convenor Abhijeet Dipke joined the protest, claiming that many candidates were unfairly marked as failed due to these issues. The Bombay High Court registrar acknowledged minor technical problems at specific centers like Aurangabad and Kalyan but stated that the overall examination proceeded smoothly. Candidates reported malfunctioning computers, unresponsive keyboards, and screens turning yellow, leading to premature logouts. Dipke criticized the authorities for inadequate preparation and questioned why proper equipment and functioning servers were not ensured. He emphasized the long-distance travel and extensive preparation of the candidates, urging immediate action for a re-examination.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a systemic failure by the government and authorities, emphasizing the unfair treatment of candidates and criticizing the lack of preparedness. It highlights the impact on the candidates' futures and uses emotive language such as 'failure certificate' and questions,
Why factuality (78): The article reports on a protest by candidates over technical issues during an online typing test, citing statements from both the protesters and the Bombay High Court registrar. It provides details about the number of candidates, locations, and time frame of the incident. While it presents conflict
Why objectivity (82): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both the candidates' complaints and the court's response. It avoids emotionally charged language and focuses on reporting the events without apparent bias. However, the mention of 'alleged disruption' and 'alleged failure' slightly leans toward the pr
‘Faulty mouse, logged out’: CJP slams ‘irregularities’ in Bombay HC clerk recruitment typing test; Dipke joins protestCJP founder Abhijeet Dipke criticized the Bombay High Court clerk recruitment typing test for technical failures, including faulty computer equipment and students being logged out within minutes. He accused the government of failing to provide proper infrastructure for online exams, claiming such issues are not isolated incidents but recurring problems nationwide. Dipke joined students protesting the exam irregularities, calling for a re-examination. The authorities, represented by Director Sanjay Wankhede of Sornet ITE Genus Private Limited, responded to the allegations.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure of the government and infrastructure, using strong criticism of bureaucratic inefficiency and highlighting student grievances. The emphasis on poor governance and the call for accountability align with left-leaning critiques of institutional neglect
Why factuality (75): The article reports on allegations of irregularities in the Bombay High Court clerk recruitment exam, citing statements from CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke. While there is no primary source document, the claims align with similar reports from other sources discussing technical failures in online exams.
Why objectivity (60): The tone of the article leans towards supporting the concerns raised by Dipke and the CJP, using emotionally charged language like 'failure of the system' and 'unable to conduct online exams properly.' It frames the issue as a systemic failure rather than presenting both sides of the argument, which
India
