Jelka Godec to the MP for Svoboda: "Colleague Tacer, it is not nice to lie".

VečerIndependent🔒Center4 hr. ago

In a public exchange, Jelka Godec, leader of the governing party SDS, criticized Lucija Tacer Perlin from the Freedom Party (Svoboda) over comments made by Tacer regarding the establishment of investigative committees. Tacer had stated that the opposition and coalition are not in the same position when it comes to setting up such committees, implying that they are primarily a tool of the opposition. Godec responded by accusing Tacer of dishonesty, arguing that investigative committees are not exclusive to the opposition and that any minority of MPs could request their formation. She also reminded Tacer of her past actions during the previous parliamentary term, noting that while in the coalition, she had demanded the creation of two investigative committees and led three others. Godec highlighted that despite more than 30 signatures supporting an investigation into GEN-i, the former president of the National Assembly, Urška Klakočar Zupančič, did not call for an extraordinary session to approve the act establishing the committee. Additionally, Godec referenced Mojca Šetinc Pašek’s comment that these investigations were conducted with the aim of settling political scores with the反对派

Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct exchange between two politicians from opposing parties, highlighting their differing views on the role and usage of investigative committees. The content does not exhibit clear bias toward either side but rather reports on the accusations and counter-accusations made by

Nova24TVParty-alignedConservative5 hr. ago

The article discusses accusations against Slovenian parliamentarian Lucija Tacer Perlin, who was criticized for allegedly misleading during a televised debate on parliamentary investigative committees. Jelka Godec, leader of the SDS parliamentary group, responded by highlighting past actions of the opposition parties (Svoboda and Levica), including their requests for and leadership of multiple investigative committees during previous mandates. She pointed out that these parties now accuse the current coalition (Janša’s fourth government) of blocking such committees, while they previously used them selectively for political purposes. The article notes that members of the opposition, including Tina Brecelj, Borut Sajovic, Robert Golob, and Alenka Bratušek, did not vote on proposed agendas involving the establishment of investigative committees, suggesting a lack of genuine interest in these mechanisms.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the opposition (Svoboda and Levica) as politically motivated actors using investigative committees for partisan gain, contrasting them with the current coalition which is portrayed as more transparent and less selective in its use of these mechanisms. The emphasis on past behavior