ON
← Back to feed
Memory lapses, fake invoices and a reprimand: Key moments from ICAC
Australia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive8 days ago

Memory lapses, fake invoices and a reprimand: Key moments from ICAC

The NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) continues its investigation into alleged illegal political donations and potential influence-peddling linked to fugitive property developer Jean Nassif. During recent hearings, lobbyist Jeremy Greenwood faced scrutiny for frequent responses of 'I don't know' and 'I don't recall,' including a moment where he claimed he couldn't remember details from a phone call. He also made a provocative remark during the session, prompting a reprimand from Commissioner Fabian Gleeson. The inquiry revealed a text exchange where Greenwood referred to 'filthy schools money' and 'f***ing whinging,' which counsel assisting Peggy Dwyer suggested might relate to Catholic Schools NSW funds being funneled into Liberal Party recruitment. Additionally, Dallas McInerney, a key figure in the case, testified about his communications with federal Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, including a message expressing intent to 'shake down Angus for 10k.'

Jeremy Greenwood, a prominent lobbyist and political operator, has been appearing before the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) as part of Operation Rosny, an ongoing investigation into corruption within New South Wales politics. The latest developments reveal that Greenwood allegedly instructed the head of NSW Catholic Schools to avoid an inquiry and sought to have Jean-Nassif cover the costs of a trip to Fiji for Jean-Claude Perrottet, a key figure in the Reformers party. According to reports from The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald, Greenwood admitted during his testimony that he arranged for a “shit sheet” targeting former police minister David Elliott, aiming to undermine the politician. The document, intended to damage Elliott's reputation, was commissioned by Greenwood on behalf of Jean Nassif, a disgraced developer known for his animosity toward Elliott. Despite claims that the dossier was meant to protect Greenwood’s business interests, the ICAC has scrutinized the motives behind its creation. During his appearance, Greenwood expressed unwavering loyalty to his friend Jean-Claude Perrottet, stating he would provide financial assistance from his personal accounts. However, he claimed to have no recollection of any payments originating from hotelier Michael O’Hara, who had previously pledged support to the Reformers. The commission noted that O’Hara’s involvement remains under investigation. Greenwood also faced scrutiny over a late-night phone call from his former business associate, Christian Ellis, shortly after delivering his initial testimony. The conversation, conducted via the encrypted messaging app Signal, was described by Greenwood as a simple welfare check. Ellis, who is currently residing in the United Kingdom and has refused to testify, is considered a person of interest in the case. Following his private testimony in June 2025, Greenwood met with Jean-Claude Perrottet at the Oaks, a pub in Double Bay. Both men placed their phones at a separate table to avoid surveillance, according to the ICAC. While Greenwood denied arranging the meeting, he acknowledged that they frequently visit the establishment together. The commission emphasized that disclosing such information is a criminal offense once the commissioner has deemed it confidential. Further revelations include evidence that Jean-Claude Perrottet secured a high-paying position at Catholic Schools NSW, with a base salary of $165,000. This comes amid allegations that the younger brother of former Premier Dominic Perrottet was evading a parliamentary inquiry by fleeing to Fiji. The ICAC has learned that the fugitive received $25,000 to fund his travel expenses, with plans to have Jean Nassif eventually cover the cost of his stay. This arrangement appears to have been orchestrated to circumvent legal proceedings. Catholic Schools NSW, which manages approximately $3.8 billion in annual public funds allocated to religious education institutions, has been linked to several individuals associated with the Reformers. Among them are Robert Assaf and Dylan Whitelaw, both of whom have been named in previous investigations. The organization’s former CEO, Dallas McInerney, is set to appear as a witness tomorrow, facing questions regarding the role of Reformers-linked figures within the institution. The ICAC continues to gather evidence against key players in the political and corporate spheres, with the focus remaining on uncovering connections between lobbying activities, financial dealings, and institutional influence. As the inquiry progresses, further details are expected to emerge, particularly concerning the extent of collaboration between lobbyists, politicians, and business leaders. The outcome of these hearings could significantly impact the political landscape in New South Wales.

3 reports

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago
Memory lapses, fake invoices and a reprimand: Key moments from ICAC

The NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) continues its investigation into alleged illegal political donations and potential influence-peddling linked to fugitive property developer Jean Nassif. During recent hearings, lobbyist Jeremy Greenwood faced scrutiny for frequent responses of 'I don't know' and 'I don't recall,' including a moment where he claimed he couldn't remember details from a phone call. He also made a provocative remark during the session, prompting a reprimand from Commissioner Fabian Gleeson. The inquiry revealed a text exchange where Greenwood referred to 'filthy schools money' and 'f***ing whinging,' which counsel assisting Peggy Dwyer suggested might relate to Catholic Schools NSW funds being funneled into Liberal Party recruitment. Additionally, Dallas McInerney, a key figure in the case, testified about his communications with federal Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, including a message expressing intent to 'shake down Angus for 10k.'

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the ICAC proceedings, focusing on the testimonies and actions of individuals under investigation without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the legal and ethical implications of the alleged misconduct without taking a clear ideological slant

Why factuality (85): The article provides a summary of recent developments in Operation Rosny, including specific quotes from Jeremy Greenwood and descriptions of interactions during the ICAC hearing. It references the allegations involving Jean Nassif and political donations, aligning with the cross-source consensus. T

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts and quotes without overt bias. However, there is a slight editorial tilt in describing Mr. Greenwood's behavior as 'making the job of counsel assisting a struggle,' which implies judgment rather than purely reporting facts.

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 8011 days ago
NSW Liberal faction's 'filthy schools money' text a 'stupid joke', ICAC hears

The NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) is investigating allegations that prohibited political donations were funneled through third parties to support a right-wing Liberal-aligned faction known as the NSW Reformers. Lobbyist Jeremy Greenwood, who is connected to the faction, admitted sending a text message to Jean-Claude Perrottet, brother of former Premier Dominic Perrottet, referencing 'filthy schools money.' The message, which was shared during the ICAC inquiry, suggested payments from Catholic Schools NSW (CSNSW) were being used to fund Liberal Party recruitment efforts. Greenwood described the text as a 'stupid joke,' claiming it was meant to provoke Perrottet. Counsel assisting the commission argued that the message demonstrated knowledge of the fraudulent arrangements, while Greenwood denied any wrongdoing.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: the ICAC's investigation into potential corruption and Greenwood's defense of the text as a joke. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing of the story, which focuses on the legal proceedings and the conflicting accounts rather than taking a立场.

Why factuality (75): The article reports on an ongoing ICAC investigation into alleged prohibited donations to a Liberal-aligned faction, citing a text exchange between Jeremy Greenwood and Jean-Claude Perrottet. It mentions the use of companies, sham invoices, and consulting agreements to disguise donations, aligning w

Why objectivity (80): The article presents facts neutrally, focusing on the allegations and the ICAC's role without overt bias. It includes quotes from multiple sources and avoids emotionally charged language, maintaining a balanced tone.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 6012 days ago
Jean-Claude Perrottet given ‘kickback’ from Catholic Schools NSW contract, ICAC hears

During the ICAC Operation Rosny hearings, lobbyist Jeremy Greenwood testified that he provided 'kickbacks' to his close friend Jean-Claude Perrottet in exchange for helping secure a contract with Catholic Schools NSW. Greenwood claimed that Perrottet, who worked for Medallion Financial, received 50% of JPG Advisory's retainer as compensation for facilitating the deal. Greenwood also mentioned giving a one-time payment to Reformers co-founder Robert Assaf. Greenwood defended these payments as legitimate commissions and suggested they were necessary to ensure Perrottet's cooperation. The testimony comes amid allegations of improper influence and financial arrangements involving Perrottet and other individuals.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents allegations of corruption involving a prominent figure (Jean-Claude Perrottet), a right-wing organization (Reformers), and potential conflicts of interest. The framing emphasizes the nature of the alleged kickbacks and the involvement of a politically aligned group, suggesting a

Why factuality (75): Similar to Article 0, this piece covers the same allegations about Catholic Schools NSW and teacher concerns over transparency. It references the ICAC inquiry and quotes officials, but lacks the detailed testimonies found in Article 1. The alignment with other sources supports its factual basis, but

Why objectivity (60): The tone is similar to Article 0, suggesting concern over the impact of the allegations on schools and teachers. Phrases like 'actions of a few within the sector are undermining the work of its schools and teachers' carry a judgmental undertone, affecting objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories