I wanted to revive my father : from China to Japan, the search for love and immortality by AI
The article discusses the growing trend in Asia of using artificial intelligence (AI) to cope with grief and loneliness, particularly through creating digital avatars to 'resurrect' deceased loved ones. It focuses on the case of Zhang Xinyu, a 40-year-old secretary in China who, after her father’s death from cancer and her mother’s remarriage, turned to AI technology developed by startup Superbrain. The article highlights how AI is being used to create lifelike avatars that mimic the deceased, offering emotional comfort. However, the piece ends abruptly due to subscription restrictions, leaving the broader implications and ethical considerations of such technology unexplored.
In China’s northeastern province of Liaoning, a middle-aged secretary named Zhang Xinyu has turned to artificial intelligence to cope with the loss of her father, who died of cancer three years ago. The emotional weight of his death was compounded by her mother’s new relationship, which left her feeling abandoned. Desperate to reconnect with her father, Xinyu sought help from Zhang Zewei, founder of the startup Superbrain, whose technology aims to digitally resurrect the deceased through lifelike avatars. “I want to bring my father back!” she challenged him, sparking a project that blends cutting-edge AI with deeply personal grief. Zhang Zewei, known as a tech innovator, responded with enthusiasm. His company specializes in creating hyper-realistic digital replicas of individuals using their visual data and cognitive patterns. By cloning images and reconstructing thought processes, Superbrain claims to generate entities that mirror the deceased in appearance and behavior. For Xinyu, this meant more than just a technological marvel, it represented a chance to reclaim a sense of connection and continuity after profound loss. The process, however, involves complex ethical and psychological considerations, particularly when dealing with family members who have passed away. The case highlights a growing trend in Asia where AI is being used to address emotional and existential voids created by modern life. In Japan, similar initiatives have emerged, with some families opting for digital memorials or even AI-generated companions. These developments reflect broader societal shifts toward embracing technology as a tool for coping with mortality and loneliness. In a region marked by rapid urbanization and declining traditional social structures, many feel increasingly isolated, turning to innovation for solace. Superbrain’s work is part of a larger movement in the field of AI-driven emotional support systems. While the company focuses on recreating lost loved ones, other startups are exploring applications such as virtual assistants, mental health chatbots, and even AI-powered therapy sessions. The underlying idea is that technology can provide comfort, guidance, and companionship in ways previously unimaginable. However, these innovations also raise questions about the boundaries of human relationships and the potential risks of over-reliance on synthetic interactions. Bill Gates, a long-time advocate for responsible technological advancement, has expressed concerns about the implications of AI. In recent statements, he warned that the power of artificial intelligence demands a global response that goes beyond current regulatory frameworks. He emphasized the need for international cooperation to ensure that AI development aligns with ethical standards and public safety. “People should be shocked,” he said, highlighting the urgency of addressing both the benefits and the dangers of AI as it continues to evolve. While Gates’ remarks focus on the broader implications of AI, cases like Xinyu’s illustrate how individual stories can drive innovation and shape public perception. The emotional stakes involved in projects like Superbrain’s make them powerful examples of how technology can intersect with deeply personal experiences. Yet, they also underscore the complexity of integrating AI into human lives, balancing hope with caution, innovation with responsibility. As the use of AI in personal and familial contexts expands, so too does the debate around its role in society. Governments, corporations, and ethicists are grappling with how to regulate emerging technologies while respecting individual choice and cultural values. In countries like China and Japan, where tradition often coexists with rapid modernization, the adoption of AI-based solutions reflects both a desire for progress and a longing for continuity. Whether these technologies will ultimately enhance well-being or create new forms of dependency remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the intersection of AI and emotion is becoming an increasingly central part of contemporary life.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article features an interview with Bill Gates discussing the need for a global, unprecedented response to artificial intelligence (AI). Gates emphasizes the transformative potential of AI but warns of its risks if not properly regulated. He calls for international cooperation to address challenges such as ethical concerns, security threats, and economic disruption. The piece highlights his belief that coordinated action by governments and institutions is essential to harness AI’s benefits while mitigating its dangers.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Bill Gates' perspective on AI regulation without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific political ideologies. While he raises concerns about AI's impact, the tone remains balanced, focusing on the necessity of global collaboration rather than advocating for a particular left-
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Bill Gates' statement about AI requiring a global response, aligning with the primary source document. It does not add any new information beyond what is implied by the quote, maintaining factual consistency.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents Bill Gates' views in a neutral tone, focusing on his concerns and call for regulation without introducing personal bias or emotional language.
Les ÉchosIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 858/26/2026
Bill Gates has expressed concerns about the potential dangers of artificial intelligence, stating that people should be 'horrified' by its capabilities. In an interview with Les Échos, Gates emphasized the need for regulation to manage these risks effectively. He highlighted the transformative power of AI but warned against its misuse, calling for proactive measures to ensure ethical development. The discussion reflects broader debates around AI governance and the balance between innovation and safety.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Bill Gates' concerns about AI without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific policies or political stances. It focuses on his call for regulation rather than taking a partisan position. While the issue of AI regulation is politically charged, the framing remains balanced, not
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects Bill Gates' statements about AI risks and calls for regulation, consistent with the primary source. The phrasing 'les gens devraient être hallucinés' is a direct quote or paraphrase of his sentiment, preserving factual integrity.
Why objectivity (85): While the article conveys Bill Gates' concerns effectively, it uses more emotionally charged language such as 'inquiétudes' and 'dangers', which may slightly skew the tone towards alarmism rather than neutrality.
Le FigaroIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 708/22/2026
The article discusses the growing trend in Asia of using artificial intelligence (AI) to cope with grief and loneliness, particularly through creating digital avatars to 'resurrect' deceased loved ones. It focuses on the case of Zhang Xinyu, a 40-year-old secretary in China who, after her father’s death from cancer and her mother’s remarriage, turned to AI technology developed by startup Superbrain. The article highlights how AI is being used to create lifelike avatars that mimic the deceased, offering emotional comfort. However, the piece ends abruptly due to subscription restrictions, leaving the broader implications and ethical considerations of such technology unexplored.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of technological innovation and personal grieving processes without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political stance. While it touches on societal trends and cultural practices related to mourning, it does not frame the issue in a politically charged or sl
Why factuality (85): The article reports on an AI-generated father figure created by Zhang Xinyu using technology from Superbrain startup. It aligns with the primary source document's content regarding the use of AI to recreate deceased individuals. The article does not contradict the primary source but omits some detai
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat sentimental, focusing on personal grief and emotional resolution through technology. While informative, it leans into the emotional narrative rather than presenting a balanced discussion of ethical or technological concerns.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
France
