Is Congressman Truth Mijichi sorry he didn't take a seven-figure bribe?
The article discusses allegations of bribery against Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, a member of the Resnica party, and his leadership under Zoran Stevanović. It claims that three Resnica MPs, including Mijič, were offered bribes to switch political allegiance and that they allegedly rejected these offers. The article highlights the erosion of public trust in the political space due to these accusations. Mijič’s reputation as an honest politician has been damaged by revelations that his company, Progros, allegedly defrauded employees by falsifying signatures and delaying tax payments. Despite these financial obligations, Mijič’s family reportedly took a vacation to Greece, and he attempted to hire 25 new workers after the scandal broke. His leader, Zoran Stevanović, initially promised to cover the debts but later pressured Mijič to settle them by year-end or resign. External parties, including construction companies CGP and Kolektor Koling, reportedly paid 32,000 euros to resolve outstanding work-related debts at Progros. While the bribery scandal has largely faded, the article suggests that Mijič’s refusal to accept 'seven-seat' numbers (likely referring to political alliances)—
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The parliamentary committee chairman for economy, work, and sports, Robert Potnik (Demokrati), has decided not to convene an urgent session of the committee at the request of the Left and Freedom parliamentary groups regarding the case of Resnica MP Boris Mijič. The groups had requested the session to address questions about Mijič's political accountability and suitability due to alleged controversial business practices. Potnik stated that the focus of the request was on the individual conduct and ethical or political responsibility of Mijič, which does not fall under the committee’s jurisdiction. He emphasized that the committee's role is limited to matters within its defined scope, such as economic issues, and that questions related to a member's mandate, immunity, or rights are handled by the electoral commission. The Left and Freedom group had hoped to open discussions on Mijič's potential resignation, citing allegations that he receives a parliamentary salary while owing tens of thousands of euros to the state and former employees.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision of Robert Potnik and his reasoning without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Potnik and mentions the motivations of the Left and Freedom group but does not use biased language or selectively omit information. The framing remains neutral, as a
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 88): Factual alignment with the primary source document. Maintains neutrality in describing the political stance and legal reasoning.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 888 days ago
The article discusses the situation of Borisa Mijič, a parliament member whose activities at his company Progros are under scrutiny by the Anti-Corruption Commission. Since mid-June, Mijič has not been present in parliamentary sessions. Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Assembly and leader of the Resnica party, comments on the potential consequences if Mijič fails to meet obligations set by the party, including repaying debts and avoiding legal issues. He states that if Mijič is found guilty of wrongdoing before October 10th, he will demand his resignation. While some within the party question Mijič’s credibility and mandate, Stevanović maintains confidence in the party’s position and rejects external pressure. The article also mentions similar allegations against Mijič by Stevanović last week, which were denied by SSI Schäfer, citing unverified claims from a former lawyer.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation around the potential removal of Mijič due to alleged misconduct, emphasizing the political implications and the role of the party leadership. It highlights the internal party dynamics and the influence of the party leader, suggesting a left-leaning perspective by foc
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 88): Fully factual and maintains objectivity in reporting on Stevanović’s payment of debts to former employees.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 853 days ago
Zoran Stevanović, predsednik stranke Resnica, je poplačal tri delavce podjetja Progros, ki so ostali brez plač. Delavci so dobili nakazane vse zaostale plače, kar podjetje zdaj dolguje Stevanoviću. Stevanović je izjavil, da verjame, da bo dolg poplačan do konca leta, kot je bilo dogovorjeno. Na vprašanje, ali meni, da je poslanec Boris Mijič, lastnik Progrosa, še vedno politično odgovoren za svoja dejanja, je Stevanović poudaril, da odgovornost Mijiča bodo ugotavljali ustrezni organi. Stevanović je tudi napovedal, da bodo pripravili predlog novele zakona o gradbeništvu, ki bo predvideval načine plačevanja tudi podizvajalcev. Delavska svetovalnica je ocenila, da se je Stevanović poskušal izogniti resničnim problemom, obrnivši se proti določenim strankam, ki so pritiskale na delavce Progrosa.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Stevanović's actions as politically motivated, emphasizing his efforts to protect Mijič and gain public favor while criticizing the lack of legal accountability. The Delavska svetovalnica's criticism implies a critique of the current system, aligning with left-leaning perspectives
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Accurate and neutral in reporting on Stevanović’s action, while subtly implying political motivations.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 857 days ago
The president of the Chamber of Deputies' Economic Affairs Committee, Robert Potnik, has rejected a request to call an urgent session to address allegations of political responsibility and suitability of MP Boris Mijič. The request was submitted by parliamentary groups Left, Vesna, and Freedom. Potnik stated that individual scrutiny of a parliamentarian’s conduct does not fall under the committee’s jurisdiction. He emphasized that the proposed agenda item focuses on personal accountability rather than systemic issues within the committee’s mandate. The decision aligns with legal provisions that define the committee’s responsibilities, which exclude matters related to mandates, immunity, or positions of MPs. The request was based on recent claims of corruption against Mijič, with some parties planning to demand his resignation. The matter could still be addressed through the constitutional commission for parliamentary rules.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the rationale behind the rejection of the request without overtly favoring any political side. It provides detailed legal reasoning from the committee president and references statements from opposition figures without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue involves劾
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Factual and objective, providing clear information on Mijič’s position and Stevanović’s response without overt bias.
Nova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8510 days ago
The article reports on a political conflict between the Left Party (Levica) and a member of the Resnica parliamentary group, Boris Mijič. Levica accuses Mijič of financial misconduct, claiming his company has unpaid wages and social contributions to employees, as well as tax debts to the state. They organized a press conference where they reiterated their demand for Mijič to resign from his position as a parliamentarian. The accusations include allegations that Mijič is attempting to hire new workers while failing to pay existing employees. Levica’s spokesperson, Nataša Sukič, criticized Mijič’s actions as unacceptable and called for political responsibility. She also accused the head of the National Council, Zoran Stevanović, of protecting Mijič and undermining institutional integrity. In response, Mijič is said to have significant difficulties paying salaries and benefits to his employees. Levica has called for an emergency meeting of the National Council to address the issue. The article also criticizes Levica for selectively addressing financial issues involving members of other parties, such as former mayor Zoran Janković and leader of the Freedom Party Robert Golob.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Mijič’s financial responsibilities as a matter of political accountability and integrity, aligning with the Left Party’s critique of corporate behavior and fiscal responsibility. It emphasizes the failure of Mijič to fulfill obligations to employees and the州
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Detailed and factually aligned with the primary source. Maintains a balanced tone despite strong criticism of Stevanović’s actions.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 857 days ago
The article reports that Slovenian parliament member Robert Potnik, chairman of the parliamentary committee for economy, labor, and sports, has rejected a request to call an emergency session to address alleged unethical behavior by fellow MP Boris Mijič of the Resniča party. The request was submitted by members of the parties Sloboda, Ljubljana, and Vesna, who sought to examine Mijič’s political responsibility and suitability. Potnik stated that the issue falls outside the committee’s jurisdiction, as it concerns individual conduct rather than matters within the committee’s mandate. He cited specific articles of the parliamentary rules, emphasizing that questions regarding a representative’s mandate, immunity, position, or rights are handled separately by the electoral commission. The article notes that while the request included references to economic and labor issues, its focus was on Mijič’s personal conduct and ethical/political accountability. It also mentions that the requesting parties intended to demand Mijič’s resignation due to recent allegations against him.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the positions of both the requesting parties and the committee chairman objectively, without overtly favoring either side. It explains the legal basis for Potnik’s decision and includes quotes from him, while also noting the intent of the requesting parties. There is no clear sl
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Accurate reporting on the refusal to call an emergency session, aligning with the primary source. Objectivity slightly compromised by political framing of the issue.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 803 days ago
Zoran Stevanović, predsednik državnega zbora in stranke Resnica, je izpolnil svojo obljubo in izplačal zaostale plače treh nekdanjih delavcev podjetja Progros, ki jih je dolgoval bivši direktor podjetja in aktualni poslanec Resnice Boris Mijič. Delavci so prejeli vsaj del zneskov, ki jih je Mijič dolgoval. Stevanović je poudaril, da je ta primer dokaz, kako resnično so njegove izjave in da Mijič dolguje denar, ki ga mora vrniti do konca leta. Stevanović je tudi kritiziral opozicijsko Levico, ki bi po njegovih besedah želela, da Resnica izgubi enega poslanca zaradi te afere. Na drugi strani pa je vodja opozicijske Levice Asta Vrečko kritizirala Stevanovićev pristop, ki jo je označila kot pokroviteljski in zlorabo moči za politično propaganda.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: Stevanović's claims about repaying debts and his criticism of the opposition, as well as Vrečko's counter-criticism of Stevanović's actions. The framing appears balanced, with both parties' viewpoints included without overtly biased language or selective fact-
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Factual report with some subjective language regarding Stevanović’s claim of 'humanity', showing mild bias.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 807 days ago
The article discusses a controversy involving Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Assembly, who invited three former employees of the company Progros, who were owed wages by the company's owner and former director, Boris Mijič, a member of the Respublica party. The invitation was criticized by Elvis Alukić, president of the Bosnian Cultural Association of Slovenia, who accused Stevanović of exploiting the workers' plight for political promotion rather than genuine humanitarian efforts. Alukić compared this behavior to the practices of Serbian President Aleksander Vučić and questioned whether Slovenia had reached such a low point in politics. Stevanović defended his actions, stating that the workers were not at fault and were not involved in political disputes. The article also notes that Stevanović has been claiming for several weeks that he would resolve Mijič's debt to the workers and prevent him from resigning before October, which could trigger new elections.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as an exploitation of vulnerable individuals for political gain, using strong criticism against a high-ranking official and comparing his actions to those of a controversial leader (Vučić). This framing suggests a critical stance toward the political establishment, a
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Accurate summary of the situation, though leans toward critical commentary on Stevanović’s handling of the issue.
ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 807 days ago
The Slovenian National Assembly has decided not to hold a session on the conduct of MP Boris Mijič, citing procedural grounds. The decision was made by the committee for Economy, Work, and Sport after reviewing a request to discuss Mijič's alleged unethical business practices. The committee argued that the issue falls outside their jurisdiction, which is limited to systemic matters within their domain, rather than individual ethical or political accountability of a specific MP. According to the parliamentary rules, questions related to MPs' mandates, immunity, status, or rights fall under the mandate-electoral commission. The request for a session was submitted by members of the Left, Vesna, and Freedom parties, who wanted to address Mijič's political responsibility and suitability for office. They had previously indicated they would demand his resignation due to allegations that he owes tens of thousands of euros to the state and employees while receiving a parliamentary salary. Sokoordinator of the Left, Luka Mesec, criticized the situation as indicative of systemic corruption within the current government coalition.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the procedural reasoning provided by the committee and includes perspectives from multiple political groups. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing but provides a balanced account of the legal arguments and political motivations behind the decision.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Reports accurately on the allegations against Mijič but shows some bias in the tone towards the opposition parties.
Žurnal24IndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 654 days ago
The article reports that President of the Resnica party, Zoran Stevanović, has settled debts owed by three workers of the Progros company, who had been unpaid. He stated that these workers received their overdue wages, with one receiving €6,000 and two others €3,000 each. The company Progros now owes Stevanović this money, which he expects to be repaid by the end of the year as agreed. Stevanović also mentioned that the MP Boris Mijič would address the issue publicly for the first time on Wednesday. Regarding Mijič’s responsibility, Stevanović emphasized that appropriate authorities will determine it, stating that if Mijič fails to repay the debt or is found guilty in any case, he would lose his mandate. Stevanović accused certain parties of exerting pressure on the workers of Progros, claiming they are not interested in the workers' well-being but want to ensure Resnica loses a mandate. He also noted widespread payment irregularities in the construction sector and announced plans to propose a new law to improve payment practices.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation in a manner that supports the Resnica party leadership, particularly Zoran Stevanović. It emphasizes the settlement of debts as a victory for the party, implies political accountability for Mijič, and attributes external pressures to rival parties. The language used,
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): Accurate reporting on events and statements, but leans towards supporting Stevanović’s actions while downplaying criticism of Mijič, indicating partial objectivity.
MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 603 days ago
The article discusses calls for Boris Mijič, a member of the National Assembly representing the party Resnica, to resign due to financial misconduct. Mijič, owner of construction company Progros, has pledged to repay all his debts by year-end after facing significant financial pressure. However, opposition members from the Levica and Vesna parliamentary group argue that his actions show a lack of accountability and demand his resignation. They highlight that Mijič has failed to pay wages to approximately 15 workers, owes the state between €30,000 and €50,000 in unpaid taxes and contributions, and has not fulfilled obligations to creditors. Opposition figures like Luka Mesec and Lenart Žavbi criticize Mijič’s behavior as unacceptable and question why he remains a parliamentarian despite these issues. The article notes that Progros has had its accounts blocked for months and faces potential bankruptcy, while Mijič has not disclosed ownership of the company to the anti-corruption commission.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Mijič's financial mismanagement as a serious breach of responsibility, emphasizing the expectation that politicians should take accountability rather than express emotional remorse. It highlights criticism from left-leaning parliamentary groups (Levica and Vesna), who call for his
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 60): Very factually aligned with the primary source, accurately quoting Elvis Alukić's comments. Objectivity is low due to highly emotional and accusatory language.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 89Objective 603 days ago
The article reports that former director and MP Boris Mijič has apologized and pledged to repay debts after a situation involving unpaid wages at the company Progros. The incident was triggered by the chairman of Resnica, Zoran Stevanović, who recently paid three employees of Progros. Mijič now presents his perspective on the matter and the complications surrounding wage payments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of Mijič's actions and the context provided by the chairman of Resnica. There is no clear ideological framing or emphasis on specific political positions. The narrative remains balanced, focusing on the event itself rather than taking a partisan stance.
Why these scores (Factual 89 · Objective 60): Detailed and aligned with the primary source, but includes subjective language when describing Mijič’s state of mind, reducing objectivity.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 88Objective 603 days ago
Boris Mijič, the former CEO of Progros, stated he will pay off all remaining debts by the end of the year. Three employees who were owed wages received their outstanding payments yesterday. Mijič apologized to Slovenia, the workers, and their families for the situation.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a financial commitment made by a private individual and mentions an apology to affected parties, but does not take a clear stance or show bias toward any political side. The content is factual and neutral in tone.
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): Accurate in detailing Mijič’s statement and financial obligations, but frames the issue in a way that suggests personal responsibility rather than systemic issues.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 87Objective 653 days ago
Boris Mijič, poslanec Resnice, je prvič po razkritjih o finančnih težavah njegovega podjetja Progros pred kamere. Podjetje dolguje več deset tisoč evrov državi in delavcem. Mijič je obljubil, da bo do konca leta poplačal vse dolgove, vendar ni izključil možnosti odstopa. Poudarjal je potrebo po transparentnosti in odgovornosti.
Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja dejstvo, da je Mijič pripravljen poplačati dolgove, kar kaže na odgovornost, vendar pa ne daje nobene politične ocene ali kritike. Vsebina ne predstavlja zelo enstranskega pristopa, zato se ugotovi, da je lekanje sredino.
Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 65): Factual details match the primary source, though there is a slight tilt towards criticizing Mijič while not addressing political motivations clearly.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 86Objective 653 days ago
Boris Mijič, a member of the Resnica parliamentary group, has publicly apologized to the entire Slovenian public and affected employees for his financial mismanagement. He admitted to owing taxes to the state and unpaid wages to former employees, amounting to tens of thousands of euros. Mijič, who owns the construction firm Progros, claims he is working to repay all debts by the end of 2026. The police have filed criminal charges against him and his company over alleged violations of workers' rights and document forgery. Mijič stepped down as director of Progros in June 2026, though he remains a 100% owner. The Anti-Corruption Commission is investigating whether his parliamentary role conflicts with his private business activities. The Left and Vesna parties have called for Mijič's resignation from parliament due to allegations of unpaid wages, tax debt, and potential criminal activity.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Mijič's statements, actions, and the responses from various parties and institutions without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Mijič, mentions legal proceedings, and references calls for his resignation from opposition groups, providing a balanced view of
Why these scores (Factual 86 · Objective 65): Matches the primary source on key points, but emphasizes Stevanović’s role and implies political strategy, introducing potential bias.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Assembly and leader of the Resnica party, met with three employees of the Progros company who had not received their salaries. He stated he would cover their unpaid wages from his personal savings, calling it an act of humanity rather than manipulation. The employees were reportedly left without pay by Boris Mijič, a former director and current MP of Resnica, who allegedly forged their signatures on resignation forms and failed to report them to the Pension Insurance Agency. Mijič is under investigation by the Anti-Corruption Commission. Stevanović emphasized that if Mijič fails to settle his debts or is found guilty of any charges, he will lose his position as an MP.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights the actions of Zoran Stevanović, a prominent left-wing politician, who personally covers the unpaid wages of workers affected by a fellow party member. It emphasizes themes of social responsibility and ethical conduct within the party, which aligns with left-leaning values. S轻
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the event and quotes Stevanović's statements directly from the primary source. It includes details about Mijič being a former director and mentions media coverage. However, it lacks some context from the original text, such as Alukić’s strong criticism and the cultural
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
MP Boris Mijič, a member of the Resni party, has apologized to employees of his former company Progros after an affair involving exploitation and non-payment of workers emerged. He stated he would settle all debts by the end of this year but did not answer whether he would resign.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on Mijič's apology and financial commitment without taking a stance on his actions or their implications.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual accuracy is high, aligning with the primary source document. However, the article presents a more favorable view of Stevanović and less critical of Mijič, showing some bias.
ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The article discusses allegations of bribery against Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, a member of the Resnica party, and his leadership under Zoran Stevanović. It claims that three Resnica MPs, including Mijič, were offered bribes to switch political allegiance and that they allegedly rejected these offers. The article highlights the erosion of public trust in the political space due to these accusations. Mijič’s reputation as an honest politician has been damaged by revelations that his company, Progros, allegedly defrauded employees by falsifying signatures and delaying tax payments. Despite these financial obligations, Mijič’s family reportedly took a vacation to Greece, and he attempted to hire 25 new workers after the scandal broke. His leader, Zoran Stevanović, initially promised to cover the debts but later pressured Mijič to settle them by year-end or resign. External parties, including construction companies CGP and Kolektor Koling, reportedly paid 32,000 euros to resolve outstanding work-related debts at Progros. While the bribery scandal has largely faded, the article suggests that Mijič’s refusal to accept 'seven-seat' numbers (likely referring to political alliances)—
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Resnica party leaders and their alleged corruption as opportunistic and unethical, emphasizing the damage to public trust and the personal hypocrisy of Mijič. The narrative criticizes the party leadership for prioritizing self-interest over transparency and ethical政
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurate portrayal of Stevanović's public stance and Mijič's situation. Objectivity is somewhat compromised by the political critique of the party's opportunism.
MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The article discusses criticism from Elvis Alukić, president of the Bosnian cultural association in Slovenia, regarding Zoran Stevanović, president of the Resnica party and head of state assembly. Alukić condemns Stevanović for allegedly using humanitarian gestures for political promotion, comparing it to propaganda tactics used by Serbia’s Vučić regime. He expresses shame over Slovenia’s perceived descent into such practices, suggesting that citizens are treated like exhibition pieces for photography rather than being helped with their debts. The incident involves Stevanović welcoming three employees of Progros, a company owned by Resnica MP Boris Mijič, who had been unpaid.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as an exploitation of human emotion for political gain, drawing a direct comparison to authoritarian propaganda. The tone criticizes political leaders for prioritizing image over genuine assistance, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of political hypocrisy and鬻
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurate summary of Potnik's decision and legal reasoning. Objectivity is maintained through formal and neutral language despite political context.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
Zoran Stevanović, predsednik stranke Resnica, je sprejel tri nekdanje delavce podjetja Progros, ki so ostali brez plač. Stevanović je poudaril, da bo poravnal njihovo manjkajoče plačilo iz lastnih prihrankov in da ta odločitev ni politična, temveč dejstvo humanosti in poštenosti. Podjetje Progros je bilo povezano s poslancem stranke Resnica Borisom Mijičem, nekdanjim direktorjem in lastnikom podjetja. Mediji poročajo, da je Mijič lahko delal z ponarejenimi podpisi na odpovedih in imel neporavnane obveznosti do Finančne uprave Republike Slovenije. Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije obravnava njegovo službo, medtem ko Stevanović napoveduje, da Mijič ne bo več poslanec, če do konca leta ne bo poravnal vseh svojih obveznosti ali ne bo pravnomočno spoznal za krivega očitanih dejanj.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing both Stevanović's actions and the allegations against Mijič without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the facts and the potential legal implications rather than taking a clear ideological stance.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual accuracy is high, aligning with the primary source document. However, some details like the 'humanity' claim by Stevanović may be subjective. Objectivity is lower due to potential bias in portraying Mijič’s actions negatively.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.