ON
← Back to feed
Five years of Taliban rule How the Taliban lied to Afghan women
CH🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives8 days ago

Five years of Taliban rule How the Taliban lied to Afghan women

The article discusses the five-year rule of the Taliban in Afghanistan and examines how they have restricted women's freedoms despite initial promises. Following their takeover of Kabul in August 2021, the Taliban initially claimed to support women's rights, stating that they would uphold these rights within the framework of Islamic law. However, over time, the regime has imposed increasingly restrictive measures, including mandatory veiling in public, exclusion from universities, limitations on education beyond sixth grade, bans on working with NGOs, restrictions on sports and park access, and requirements for female travel to be accompanied by male relatives. According to a recent UN Women survey, half of Afghan women now leave their homes less than twice a month. While some areas show variation in enforcement, overall, the Taliban's policies have significantly curtailed women's participation in public life.

Five years of Taliban rule, how they have deceived Afghan women On August 16, 2021, the fate of Afghanistan changed dramatically at the airport in Kabul. As U.S.-led forces withdrew, tens of thousands of civilians scrambled to escape the country, clinging to planes or falling to their deaths. Outside this zone, the Taliban had already seized control. The moment marked the beginning of a second Taliban regime. Promises were made, some with conditions. Shortly after taking power, the Taliban held their first press conference in Kabul. They attempted to project a moderate image, assuring local officials who had worked with the United States that they would not target them. They also promised Afghan women a future, stating that they could continue attending school or working and that they were an essential part of society. One official spoke in English, saying, “We are guaranteeing all their rights within the limits of Islam.” This statement, delivered on August 17, 2021, became one of the earliest public assurances from the new rulers. However, many both inside and outside Afghanistan doubted how seriously the Taliban intended to uphold these promises. A senior functionary at the time noted that women’s rights would be considered “within the framework that Islam allows.” This phrasing left room for interpretation, and soon enough, the reality of Taliban governance began to reveal itself. Over the following months, the Taliban progressively restricted women’s freedoms. By May 2022, women were required by law to cover their faces in public. Access to higher education was denied, with girls allowed to attend school only up to the sixth grade. Women were barred from working for humanitarian organizations, participating in sports, or visiting parks. Travel was permitted only under the supervision of male relatives. According to a recent UN survey, half of Afghan women leave their homes no more than twice a month. The enforcement of these restrictions varied significantly between urban and rural areas. In some cities, women still walked openly without veils, while others adhered strictly to the Taliban's dress code. German-Afghan journalist Nabila Lalee, who has visited Afghanistan multiple times in recent years, observed that while some women continued to work, especially those trained as doctors or teachers before 2021, the economic situation made alternative options scarce. She noted that private art classes in Kabul, such as those attended by young women, remained open despite government prohibitions against further education. Despite these constraints, Afghan women found ways to navigate the system. While formal schooling beyond the seventh grade was prohibited, some students enrolled in religious schools, which often offered regular academic instruction. Whether this informal approach would change in the near future remains uncertain. As Lalee explained, “Predictions about Afghanistan remain difficult. Sometimes things can change quickly, but there is little indication that the Taliban will reverse course on women’s rights.” Meanwhile, the broader humanitarian crisis deepened. The lives of ordinary Afghans grew increasingly dire. Nadim, a father of two sons and a daughter, described his family’s struggle to survive in Afghanistan. After returning from Pakistan, he struggled to find stable employment, leaving his family in poverty. His youngest son needed surgery, but the cost was too high. His daughter, once among the top students in Pakistan, could no longer attend school in Afghanistan. “Looking into my daughter’s eyes breaks my heart,” he said. Artists and activists also faced severe challenges. Pomegranate Flower, a 31-year-old artist based in Kabul, launched a visual arts program for girls after schools and universities closed to female students. Despite repeated closures and confiscations of materials, she continued her work. Once, all her art supplies were seized as punishment for painting human faces. She never recovered them. For human rights defenders like Rasoul, a former university professor and activist, life under the Taliban became increasingly dangerous. Arrested in March 2023, he was subjected to interrogation, isolation, threats, and physical abuse. Even after his release, his family remained at risk. In February 2025, he was detained again and spent a night in custody before fleeing to Paris. He continues his advocacy from abroad, determined to give a voice to those silenced in Afghanistan. As the fifth year of Taliban rule draws to a close, the situation for Afghan women remains grim. Their access to education, employment, and public life has been severely curtailed. While some manage to maintain a semblance of normalcy through informal means, the broader landscape shows little sign of improvement. The promise of a better future for Afghan women appears to have been replaced by a rigid, restrictive reality.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicProgressiveFactual 90Objective 858 days ago
Humanitarian crisis Five years of the Taliban in Afghanistan three portraits

The article discusses the humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan five years after the Taliban took power, focusing on the challenges faced by ordinary citizens. It features three individuals: Nadim, a father struggling to provide for his family despite limited employment opportunities and restricted access to education for his daughter; Pomegranate Flower, an artist who continues her work despite Taliban restrictions and confiscation of materials; and Rasoul, a university professor and human rights activist who was arrested by the Taliban for his critical stance. The narrative highlights the severe limitations on women’s rights, lack of basic necessities, and suppression of dissent.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Taliban's governance as oppressive and restrictive, emphasizing the loss of freedoms, economic hardship, and cultural suppression. While it presents factual accounts of individual struggles, the overall tone aligns with a left-leaning perspective by highlighting systemic human

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source document's claims about the Taliban's restrictions on women's rights, education, and healthcare. It mentions the ban on girls' education and the challenges in accessing healthcare, aligning closely with the UN Women report. However, it does not expl

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the situation in a largely neutral manner, quoting individuals like Nadim and Pomegranate Flower to illustrate the human impact. While emotionally descriptive, it avoids overtly biased language and provides multiple perspectives. The tone remains respectful and factual.

SRF News logoSRF NewsState / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 808 days ago
Five years of Taliban rule How the Taliban lied to Afghan women

The article discusses the five-year rule of the Taliban in Afghanistan and examines how they have restricted women's freedoms despite initial promises. Following their takeover of Kabul in August 2021, the Taliban initially claimed to support women's rights, stating that they would uphold these rights within the framework of Islamic law. However, over time, the regime has imposed increasingly restrictive measures, including mandatory veiling in public, exclusion from universities, limitations on education beyond sixth grade, bans on working with NGOs, restrictions on sports and park access, and requirements for female travel to be accompanied by male relatives. According to a recent UN Women survey, half of Afghan women now leave their homes less than twice a month. While some areas show variation in enforcement, overall, the Taliban's policies have significantly curtailed women's participation in public life.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Taliban's actions as a violation of women's rights and highlights systemic repression, using terms like 'belogen' (deceived) and emphasizing the contrast between initial promises and current restrictions. It relies on international organizations like UN Women to underscore the

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the Taliban's initial promises regarding women's rights and contrasts them with the current reality. It touches on the ban on girls' education and the lack of fulfillment of the Taliban's assurances. However, it omits specific data points from the UN Women report, su

Why objectivity (80): The article uses a somewhat critical tone when discussing the Taliban's broken promises, though it remains generally objective. It includes historical context and quotes from Taliban officials, offering a balanced view despite the implied criticism.

Tages-Anzeiger logoTages-AnzeigerIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 808 days ago
Women in Afghanistan: 'Under the Taliban, there is not enough air for me to breathe'

The article discusses the situation of women in Afghanistan under the Taliban regime, citing the perspective of human rights activist Sima Samar. It highlights the challenges faced by Afghan women since the Taliban regained power five years ago, emphasizing their struggle for survival and resistance. The piece focuses on the oppressive conditions imposed on women and the limited space they have for breathing, metaphorically representing the severe restrictions placed upon them. While the article presents the experiences of women, it does not provide additional details or broader context beyond the activist’s viewpoint.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Taliban's rule as oppressive and restrictive, particularly toward women, using emotive language such as 'keine Luft zum Atmen' (no air to breathe), which implies suffocation and extreme hardship. This framing aligns with a left-leaning perspective that criticizes authoritarian

Why factuality (80): The article references the Taliban takeover and the impact on women but lacks specific details from the primary source such as the number of decrees issued or the statistics on maternal mortality. It mentions the general restriction on women's rights but doesn't elaborate on the scale of the crisis

Why objectivity (80): The article quotes Sima Samar, a human rights activist, which adds balance. However, it focuses primarily on her perspective without presenting opposing views or additional context, which slightly reduces its neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories