ON
← Back to feed
Is it possible to save RTV from the red numbers?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive13 days ago

Is it possible to save RTV from the red numbers?

The article discusses financial liquidity issues facing RTV Slovenia, which led to an extraordinary meeting of the RTVS Council. The management, responsible for delays in paying legally mandated funds, is questioned about their efforts to secure funding. Previously, the organization was forced to pay back €8.1 million in unpaid salaries to the state's unified treasury account, with €2.5 million returned by the end of June. The remaining debt stood at €5.6 million. While the administration claims they have been restricting costs since the beginning of the year through a restrictive staffing policy and limited external contractual work, they acknowledge that further cost reductions without stable financing are limited. A former head of the Program Council, Dr. Stanislav Grand, comments on the situation, noting that financial problems have always been a constant issue for the television. He criticizes the current content quality as being completely irresponsible, suggesting that poor programming affects viewer contributions and that improving quality requires cutting underperforming staff. He argues that solutions must come internally due to limited national resources.

Employees of RTVS have demanded answers from management regarding the whereabouts of promised millions, raising concerns over financial transparency and operational stability within Slovenia's public broadcaster. The legal firm representing RTVS has reportedly prepared a legal opinion on potential changes to its business plan, particularly concerning budget reallocations. This comes amid calls for an extraordinary meeting of the RTVS Council initiated by five members, including representatives of employees such as Robert Pajek, Barbara Stegeman, Janez Pirc, Gregor Drnovšek, and Ilinka Todorovski, who requested clarification on how the administration is striving to pay out funds totaling over 15 million euros under the law. They also wanted to know the status of discussions with the Office of the Government for Nationalities and the Ministry of Culture, which are supposed to allocate funds for national minority programs and music production. According to one of today’s decisions, the administration will present the draft contract for the allocation of budget funds for music production received from the Ministry of Culture on July 15th. Additionally, the council wants to see the texts of contracts related to the allocation of funds for national minority programs received from the Office of the Government for Nationalities. The head of the administration, Natalija Gorščak, assured the council members that the administration is doing everything within its power to ensure the institute receives budget funds for this year in accordance with the law. Meetings were held with Minister of Culture Ignacija Fridl Jarc and acting director of the Office of the Government for Nationalities, Gregor Perič. If negotiations with the ministry and office fail successfully for the institution, more severe liquidity problems could arise by October, she warned. The largest share of the institute's expenses are employee costs. For the payment of salaries in July alone, the institute borrowed 9.5 million euros. According to estimates, by the end of July, the institute would still owe 7.5 million euros. Špela Stare, appointed to the council by the Information Commissioner, stated that the extraordinary meeting was unnecessary because the administration had already informed the council about the situation during the last regular meeting. "At this moment, the problem is not the administration, but the state, in particular, both the previous and current government," she criticized. One of the initiators of the extraordinary meeting, Robert Pajek, warned that RTVS can't always rely on the state as a co-founder. However, he believes the institution must be prepared to handle the possibility of being left to fend for itself. Public broadcaster RTV Slovenia is facing liquidity issues, leading to an extraordinary meeting of the RTVS Council on Tuesday. There was a desire for the administration, which caused complications regarding the payment of legally mandated funds when it refused to sign a contract for the targeted use of funds for music production and for the program for national minorities, to explain how it is practically trying to secure the funds. Last month, the institute, which had signed 1999 employment contracts by June 30, was forced to borrow 8.1 million euros from the administrator of the unified state treasury account due to salary payments. According to STA reports, 2.5 million euros of the loan were repaid by the end of the month. Debt amounted to 5.6 million euros by the end of June. Meanwhile, the administration claims they have been limiting expenses since the beginning of the year, including implementing a restrictive personnel policy and reducing external contractual work. However, they insist that further reductions in staff numbers without adequate and stable financing are not unlimited, as a more significant reduction in the number of employees would affect the implementation of the program. We asked for comments on the situation at RTVS from former President of the Programming Council of RTV, Dr. Staneta Grando. He recalled the years when he held that position, stating that finances have always been a constant problem for the television station, from the quality of the program onwards. Regarding Anton Guzej, who was then the general director of RTVS, he noted his belief that Guzej was exceptional, perhaps one of the best directors in the history of the television station. He mentioned that Guzej, as general director, had only the seventh salary in order when they had a small surplus. "This means that an enormous amount of money is leaking somewhere unknown and unknowingly." He also recalled an instance when technical workers came to him demanding that he initiate a process against a well-known sports journalist, claiming he had a contract with Planica requiring them to shoot only certain advertisements, giving him a commission. However, since they did not want to start proceedings, he did not get involved in this specific case, as it was not his area of competence. Despite acknowledging that the RTV contribution is not grotesquely large, according to Grande, the worst problem is that the television station behaves completely irresponsibly in terms of content. He specifically refers to the informative program, "which is under all criticism." "Yesterday, for example, I listened to the Rai program in Slovenian, which is culturally more appropriate than the one in Ljubljana, which is content-wise terrible. This is reflected in the finances. With such quality, people are not willing to contribute, and the only solution is to ensure quality." He added that ensuring quality involves dismissing people who work poorly or do nothing at all. According to him, the solution must be found within the television station, as Slovenia does not have enough money to waste. "Therefore, I think it is time to put responsible and capable leadership at the head of the television. It is necessary to know how much the costs of broadcasts will be, and when discipline, order, and financial transparency are introduced, things will happen," he said, recalling corruption he noticed in the past, which surprised him. These were connections, "about which a person can only grab their head." According to Grande, the television station must gather itself, organize itself, ensure quality, and get rid of ideology. "The problem is not the ideology of the television employees, the problem is ignorance and poor quality." He gave the example of journalist Jurij Gustinčič, who was clearly left-leaning, but everyone respected him because he was of high quality. "If you listen to political commentaries today, you hold your head in your hands, it is below every level," said Granda, who believes that once quality is resolved, finances will be resolved too. "Only with finances will there be no quality." RTV Slovenia decided not to broadcast the awarded film Zečji nasip (Rabbit Hill), which was presented at more than 50 festivals and had its world premiere in the competition section of the Berlinale. The film was also funded by the Slovenian Film Center, a public institution. This decision has raised questions among the film community and sparked debates about the criteria used by the public radio-television institution for selecting program content, especially those co-financed by public funds and addressing important social themes. The decision by RTV Slovenia has attracted attention in Croatia, as the film Zečji nasip, directed by Čejen Černić Čanak, follows the story of forbidden love between two boys in a rural Croatian setting threatened by floods. The film is considered one of the more successful recent Croatian films and is explicitly marketed as the first Croatian LGBTQ+ film. The film was also produced in collaboration between Croatian, Slovenian, and Lithuanian producers. The decision by RTV Slovenia to not air the film has caused surprise, especially considering that public funds were invested in the film. The film was very well received at film festivals, with audiences actively engaging in conversations with the film crew and sharing personal stories inspired by the film. According to Jutarnji List, the decision by RTV Slovenia to not air the film has raised eyebrows, especially given that the film was very well received at film festivals, with audiences actively engaging in conversations with the film crew and sharing personal stories inspired by the film. According to Jutarnji List, the decision by RTV Slovenia to not air the film has raised eyebrows, especially given that the film was very well received at film festivals, with audiences actively engaging in conversations with the film crew and sharing personal stories inspired by the film. The film, which follows the story of forbidden love in a rural Croatian setting, has caused concern in Croatia. The film was produced in cooperation between Zagreb-based Kinorama, Lithuanian Tremore, and Slovenian production house Perfo Production. The director, Čejen Černić Čanak, mentioned in a June interview with MMC that while traveling with the film around festivals, she met many Croats living abroad whose families back home knew nothing about their queer identity and private lives. When they return home, they have to pretend to have a completely different life than they actually do, just like Slaven in the film, to be free. This is still the reality we live in, she said, and continued to question whether films should continue to address the issue of same-sex love and its non-acceptance in society. "Yes, we must, and we will have to for a long time," the director replied, adding that outside of events dedicated to the LGBTQ+ community, one can never find "a male couple holding hands or kissing on the main square." Despite this, the director emphasized that the film addresses the issue of RTV Slovenia faces the threat of bankruptcy, with demands for wages made through a questionable method, using funds allocated for national minorities. As the extraordinary meeting of the RTVS Council approaches, the administration emphasizes that it has been limiting expenses since the beginning of the year and aims to achieve the disbursement of funds stipulated by the new RTVS law adopted last December under the government of Robert Golob. As known, the

5 reports

Reporter logoReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago
RTV employees demand answers from the management: where are the promised millions?

The article discusses concerns raised by employees at RTV Slovenia regarding the delayed payment of over 15 million euros in funds allocated to the organization under the law. Five members of the RTV Slovenia board, including representatives of employees and workers' councils, called for an extraordinary meeting to demand transparency on how the organization has been seeking reimbursement from the state. The management has stated they are doing everything possible to secure funding in line with the law, but there are fears of liquidity issues if negotiations fail. Employees argue that while the administration is responsible, the state, both previous and current governments, has failed to fulfill its obligations. One employee warned that RTV Slovenia cannot always rely on the state as a founder and must prepare for potential self-sufficiency.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of both past and present governments to fulfill their financial obligations to RTV Slovenia, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of governmental accountability and support for public institutions. The emphasis on systemic government neglect rather than

Why factuality (90): The article presents factual information about RTV Slovenia's financial situation, including specific figures (9.5 million euros debt), dates (July), and mentions of specific individuals (Natalija Gorščak, Ignacija Fridl Jarc, Gregor Perič). These details align with cross-source consensus about the

Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely neutral in tone, presenting facts about the financial situation without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. It reports on the demands made by employees and the responses from management without editorializing.

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago
Is it possible to save RTV from the red numbers?

The article discusses financial liquidity issues facing RTV Slovenia, which led to an extraordinary meeting of the RTVS Council. The management, responsible for delays in paying legally mandated funds, is questioned about their efforts to secure funding. Previously, the organization was forced to pay back €8.1 million in unpaid salaries to the state's unified treasury account, with €2.5 million returned by the end of June. The remaining debt stood at €5.6 million. While the administration claims they have been restricting costs since the beginning of the year through a restrictive staffing policy and limited external contractual work, they acknowledge that further cost reductions without stable financing are limited. A former head of the Program Council, Dr. Stanislav Grand, comments on the situation, noting that financial problems have always been a constant issue for the television. He criticizes the current content quality as being completely irresponsible, suggesting that poor programming affects viewer contributions and that improving quality requires cutting underperforming staff. He argues that solutions must come internally due to limited national resources.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the financial struggles of RTV Slovenia as a systemic issue tied to poor management and content quality, implying that the current leadership lacks accountability. It emphasizes the need for internal reforms rather than external funding, aligning with leftist critiques of inefficI

Why factuality (90): The article presents factual information about RTV Slovenia's financial situation, including specific figures (8.1 million euros debt, 5.6 million euros remaining debt), dates (June 30th), and mentions of specific individuals (Staneta Grando). These details align with cross-source consensus about th

Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely neutral in tone, presenting facts about the financial situation without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. It quotes an expert opinion without editorializing, maintaining a balanced perspective.

Siol.net logoSiol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 70Objective 4513 days ago
Also Croatian media about the unacceptable film on Slovenian national television

The article discusses the decision by Slovenia's national television (RTV Slovenia) to not broadcast the award-winning film 'Zajčji nasip' (Zečji nasip), which was premiered at Berlinale and supported by Slovenian public funds. The film, directed by Čejen Černić Čanak, explores forbidden love between two ghosts on the Croatian countryside facing floods and is considered one of Croatia's most successful recent films. It is also noted as the first Croatian LGBTQ film and resulted from a co-production involving Croatian, Slovenian, and Lithuanian production companies. Some Croatian media and members of the film community expressed surprise and criticism over RTV Slovenia's decision, particularly because the film received strong acclaim at festivals and engaged audiences emotionally. They questioned the criteria used by the public broadcaster for selecting content, especially for films financed with public money and addressing important social themes.

Bias read (Center): While the article highlights concerns from Croatian media and the film community regarding RTV Slovenia’s decision, it presents these viewpoints neutrally without overtly endorsing any particular side. The focus remains on the controversy surrounding the broadcasting decision rather than taking a立场.

Why factuality (70): This article repeats much of the content from article 0, including accusations of legal violations and political bias. While the factual elements are similar, they lack new data or corroboration beyond what is already covered in other articles. The repetition suggests a lack of original reporting.

Why objectivity (45): The tone is again highly accusatory, repeating the same criticisms as article 0. The language is emotive and lacks balance, reinforcing a one-sided narrative without offering alternative perspectives.

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 70Objective 3516 days ago
RTV Slovenia is on the verge of bankruptcy, money for salaries is fraudulently demanded from funds for nationality

The article discusses financial difficulties faced by RTV Slovenia, highlighting concerns over the allocation of funds for ethnic programs and music production. It notes that the organization has not received the expected 7.76 million euros from the Ministry of Culture and other state offices, leading to liquidity issues and temporary debt. The new law mandates that 10% of the budget for ethnic minority programs and 4% for music production comes from the state budget. Despite this, RTV Slovenia has only managed to repay part of its debt, leaving them still indebted. The article criticizes the use of public funds for political propaganda under the guise of neutrality, suggesting that the focus is more on funding high salaries rather than genuine cultural initiatives.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the financial struggles of RTV Slovenia as a result of political exploitation, emphasizing the misuse of public funds for ideological purposes. It criticizes the 'neutrality' of public media as a cover for left-liberal political propaganda, aligning with left-wing critiques of the

Why factuality (70): The article contains some factual elements about RTV Slovenia's financial situation, including the 7.76 million euro funding shortfall and the 8.1 million euro loan. However, it includes subjective interpretations, such as claiming the law hides a 'propaganda machine' for left-liberal politics, whic

Why objectivity (35): The article exhibits clear bias, accusing RTV Slovenia of being a propaganda tool for a specific political ideology. It uses phrases like 'propagandni stroj levoliberalne politike' (propaganda machine of left-liberal politics) and frames the issue through a political lens rather than presenting neut

+Portal (Portal Plus) logo+Portal (Portal Plus)IndependentConservativeFactual 60Objective 3013 days ago
The only thing wrong with RTV Slovenia is that it does not respect the law on RTV Slovenia.

The article criticizes RTV Slovenia, a public broadcasting institution, for failing to adhere to the law governing its operations, which mandates providing objective and unbiased information to the public. It argues that many employees at RTV Slovenia, including directors and journalists, routinely violate this legal requirement by promoting their personal opinions and ideological beliefs rather than delivering balanced news. The article claims that this lack of neutrality has led RTV Slovenia into an extreme political conflict with various groups, undermining its credibility and public support. As a result, the organization’s informative programming is largely ignored by viewers who seek reliable news, while those who watch it are described as being ideologically aligned with the content. The article further notes that this issue extends beyond domestic politics, affecting how RTV Slovenia covers international topics such as Israel-Palestine relations, Iran, and the war in Ukraine.

Bias read (Conservative): The article strongly criticizes RTV Slovenia for ideological bias, suggesting that its staff prioritize personal and political views over journalistic objectivity. It frames the public broadcaster as politically active and biased against certain governments, using terms like 'propaganda pamphlets' '

Why factuality (60): This article repeats the same content as item 0 without adding new information or evidence. It discusses the alleged violation of the law by RTV Slovenia but provides no specific examples or data to back these claims. The legal text is referenced but not applied to specific incidents.

Why objectivity (30): The article maintains the same biased tone as item 0, using loaded terms like 'ekscesno nepristranskost' and portraying RTV Slovenia as being destroyed from within by politically motivated employees. It shows clear ideological bias against the public broadcaster.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories