ON
← Back to feed
Is the phone voting for the Eurovision Song Contest over?
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 days ago

Is the phone voting for the Eurovision Song Contest over?

Organizers of the Eurovision Song Contest are proposing significant changes to voting rules to counteract campaigns attempting to influence outcomes. According to a proposal by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), public voting would take place exclusively online, requiring viewers to select three favorites rather than repeatedly voting for a single performer. This follows increased scrutiny after Israel's government encouraged voters to maximize their votes for its representative in 2025. Despite adjustments to reduce the maximum number of votes per person to 10, Israeli television still faced warnings from Eurovision organizers over promotional content urging fans to vote multiple times. The latest proposals aim to prevent all votes from being concentrated in one country while addressing concerns about politically motivated voting influenced by geopolitical tensions.

The European Broadcasting Union has announced plans to end phone voting for the Eurovision Song Contest, citing concerns over campaign-driven outcomes. The proposed changes would shift public voting exclusively online, with participants required to select three favorite entries instead of casting multiple votes for a single artist. This follows growing scrutiny over the influence of political and commercial interests on the contest’s results. In 2025, Israel's government was accused of encouraging voters to cast maximum ballots for its entry, “New Day Will Rise,” performed by Yuval Raphael. Despite receiving only 15 points from the jury, the song secured more public votes than all other contestants, finishing in second place. National broadcasters raised questions about the Israeli placement, pointing to social media profiles linked to the government, including that of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which urged supporters to vote repeatedly. Although the European Radiotelevision Union reduced the maximum number of votes per person to 10 in 2026, organizers were still forced to issue a formal warning to Israeli broadcaster KAN, whose representative had encouraged fans to vote 10 times for Israel. Eurovision officials stated such messages violated the spirit of the competition and requested their removal. The latest proposals aim to eliminate the possibility of a country casting all its votes for one contestant. However, dedicated fans could potentially bypass the system by creating multiple accounts using different payment methods. In a statement to BBC News, the EBU confirmed it is considering these changes. “We can confirm we have begun exploring a transition to exclusive public internet voting for Eurovision. More details will be released in the coming months.” The EBU has acknowledged that the current voting system influences how fans perceive the contest. “Even without large paid campaigns and under a voting system we can guarantee, it has become clear that today’s geopolitical climate encourages voting for certain artists for reasons that have little connection to their performances,” the union noted. This concern is not new, but recent instances have been frequent and deeply troubling. In a letter signed by EBU Executive Director Jean Philip De Tender and head of the Reference Group Ana Maria Bordas, they outlined two key changes: moving public voting entirely online and requiring voters to choose more than one candidate, such as three favorites. The switch to internet-based voting is partly due to the technical complexity of the existing system, which requires viewers to select multiple performers via SMS or phone calls. The United Kingdom has already moved to exclusive internet voting for this year’s contest. These changes reflect broader efforts to ensure fairness and transparency amid rising concerns about the impact of political and commercial pressures. Separately, the EBU revealed that Morocco’s oil company, Moroccan Oil, has ended its six-year sponsorship of Eurovision. The official reason for the termination was not disclosed. The brand had previously provided professional hairdressers and beauty products to all participating artists. However, the sponsorship faced criticism in recent years over protests against Israel’s participation during the Gaza war. These developments come amid a series of changes to the 70-year-old contest, including a rule banning countries involved in armed conflict or situated in politically sensitive regions from hosting the event. Minimum age requirements for performers have also been introduced.

1 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 708 days ago
Is the phone voting for the Eurovision Song Contest over?

Organizers of the Eurovision Song Contest are proposing significant changes to voting rules to counteract campaigns attempting to influence outcomes. According to a proposal by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), public voting would take place exclusively online, requiring viewers to select three favorites rather than repeatedly voting for a single performer. This follows increased scrutiny after Israel's government encouraged voters to maximize their votes for its representative in 2025. Despite adjustments to reduce the maximum number of votes per person to 10, Israeli television still faced warnings from Eurovision organizers over promotional content urging fans to vote multiple times. The latest proposals aim to prevent all votes from being concentrated in one country while addressing concerns about politically motivated voting influenced by geopolitical tensions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, discussing both the proposed changes to voting rules and the reasons behind them, including political influences. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing, providing balanced information about the issue.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the proposed changes to voting rules at Eurovision following the 2025 incident involving Israel. It references the EBU's response, the Israeli government's influence, and the subsequent rule changes. The information aligns with cross-source consensus on the issue, t

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly towards criticizing the Israeli government's involvement, using phrases like 'poticala glasače' and mentioning the EBU's concerns about 'dopušteni limit'. While factual, the narrative has a subtle bias against the actions of the Israeli authorities.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories