Janšo this sadness, now with a bitter message about Slovenia: Since 2008 we have gotten nowhere (VIDEO)
Premier Janez Janša, na forumu obrti in podjetništva, poudaril pomen stabilnega gospodarskega okolja za Slovenijo. Navedel je, da je Slovenija od leta 2008 ostala na ravni 91 % evropskega povprečja po kupni moči prebivalstva, kar kaže na stabilnost. Poiščeval je vzroke za neizkoriščen potencial in jih povezoval s nestabilnostjo v gospodarstvu in politiki. Izpostavil je rast števila zaposlenih v javni upravi in povečano javno porabo, kar je postalo nevzdržno. Predlagal je davčno sidro kot rešitev za stabilnost. Tudi zbiranje podpisov za referendum o interventnem zakonu za razvoj Slovenije ocenil kot pomembno za prihodnji razvoj. Obljubil je podporo obrtnikom in podjetnikom ter izključitev nepotrebnih obremenitev, hkrati pa opozoril na blokade ukrepov strankami, ki nasprotujejo učinkovitim rešitvam.
Premier Janez Janša has emphasized the importance of economic stability as a cornerstone of Slovenia’s future during his speech at the 21st Forum of Crafts and Entrepreneurship, organized by the Slovenian Association of Crafts and Entrepreneurs (OZS), held in Ljubljana. Speaking before the new government's mandate officially began, Janša highlighted that the economy remains one of the key factors ensuring Slovenia’s continued relative prosperity. He noted that Slovenia reached 91 percent of the European average in terms of purchasing power per capita in 2008 after a decade of intensive development and remains at that level today. “Today we are still there,” he stated, adding that Slovenia has not advanced further in this regard since then. Janša pointed to instability, both in the economy and politics, as a major reason for the underutilization of potential opportunities. Over recent years, Slovenia has faced significant challenges in both areas, according to his remarks. He credited two essential pillars of stability, the local self-government and the Slovenian economy, for maintaining the country’s relatively high standard of living. He stressed that businesses would find it easier today if opponents of effective solutions did not block so many measures. “If we have a strong crafts sector and a strong economy, we will have a strong Slovenia,” he added. A central focus of Janša’s address was the concept of a tax shelter, which he described as the most important guarantee for stability. The idea involves setting an upper limit on the share of GDP that the state can redistribute through taxes and contributions, thereby limiting tax burdens and public spending. This approach, he argued, would create a stable fiscal environment. He proposed incorporating such a mechanism into the constitution, effectively establishing a constitutional cap on public expenditure. “With this, we gain the fundamental condition for a stable tax environment,” he said. Janša also criticized the previous government for squandering numerous opportunities. He expressed disappointment that despite these missed chances, many had not learned from them. As evidence, he cited the ongoing collection of signatures for a subsequent legislative referendum on an interventionist law for Slovenia’s development. “Opposition to this law is opposition to a successful Slovenia,” he declared. According to him, the outcome of this referendum will shape the path of Slovenia’s future development more significantly than some might realize. Addressing entrepreneurs and business owners directly, Janša assured them that the government would take all necessary steps to enact “livelihood” legislation free of unnecessary burdens and restrictions. This includes implementing EU directives, though he warned that stricter rules were often introduced than intended in Brussels. This year, the OZS collected 149 requests from businesses and integrated them into the Strategy for the Development of Small Business 2026–2030. Many of these demands, he noted, are already part of the coalition agreement. “This is not a narrow political program, but rather a development plan,” he said. “It is necessary to carry out certain actions, but the environment must remain stable afterward.” The forum marked the beginning of the new government’s mandate, and Janša acknowledged the opportunity to set priorities, define development directions, and make decisions that will impact business operations in the coming years. While expectations among entrepreneurs and business owners are high, the association recognizes that not all 149 requests can be fulfilled. Nevertheless, the initial announced measures are viewed as positive signals. Blaz Cvar, president of the OZS, echoed similar sentiments in his statement to the media. He noted that over the past four years, more than 20 new burdens have been imposed on the economy, many of which were introduced without adequate dialogue or serious assessment of consequences. These include continuous changes in regulations, additional contributions, administrative obligations, and rising costs. Cvar also highlighted Slovenia’s decline in the World Competitiveness Ranking, noting that the country fell three positions to 49th place out of 70 compared nations, 17 spots behind its best ranking. Despite this, he remained optimistic that the current moment presents a chance to determine key priorities and shape the direction of Slovenia’s economic development.
The Slovenian government, led by Prime Minister Janez Janša, plans to introduce a 'tax anchor' into the constitution, which would set a maximum limit on the total tax revenue as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP). This measure aims to provide economic stability by preventing excessive taxation during periods of economic fluctuation. The proposal requires 60 parliamentary votes to pass. Similar mechanisms have been used in other countries, but many now apply them cautiously due to risks highlighted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which warns that overly rigid rules could cause problems during crises. The idea is described as the highest possible level of taxation with all taxes combined.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the proposed tax anchor as a policy initiative by the government, explaining both the potential benefits and the concerns raised by the IMF. It does not exhibit strong ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. The content remains balanced, focusing on the plan
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the proposed tax cap by Prime Minister Janez Janša's government, citing his statements at the Business and Entrepreneurship Forum. It mentions the constitutional requirement of 60 parliamentary votes and references IMF warnings about tax revenue volatility during economic cycl
Why objectivity (75): The tone is generally neutral, presenting the policy as a measure for stability. However, there is some promotional language around the 'tax cap' and emphasis on the government's initiative, which slightly leans towards supporting the policy rather than maintaining strict neutrality.
The article discusses Prime Minister Janez Janša's proposal to introduce a tax anchor (davčno sidro) into Slovenia's constitution. This measure would set an upper limit on the share of GDP that the state can redistribute through taxes and contributions, aiming to reduce tax burdens and public spending. Janša emphasized the importance of a stable and predictable business environment for economic stability, noting that Slovenia has maintained relatively high living standards compared to Europe despite past missed opportunities under previous governments. The proposal is part of broader efforts by the SDS party to ensure fiscal responsibility and economic resilience.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents the proposal as a potential constitutional change aimed at fiscal stability, it does not overtly favor or criticize the SDS party's approach. It provides balanced reporting on Janša's stance and contextualizes the proposal within broader economic discussions without clear傾
Why factuality (75): The article reports Premier Janša's statements at an economic forum, citing his emphasis on stability as a key factor for Slovenia's prosperity. It mentions the 91% EU average for purchasing power and references concerns about public spending and bureaucratic inefficiency. While these points align w
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards criticism of past governance, particularly mentioning that 'many have not learned from this.' The language suggests some level of frustration with previous administrations, though it remains focused on policy discussion rather than overtly partisan commentary.
Premier Janez Janša, na forumu obrti in podjetništva, poudaril pomen stabilnega gospodarskega okolja za Slovenijo. Navedel je, da je Slovenija od leta 2008 ostala na ravni 91 % evropskega povprečja po kupni moči prebivalstva, kar kaže na stabilnost. Poiščeval je vzroke za neizkoriščen potencial in jih povezoval s nestabilnostjo v gospodarstvu in politiki. Izpostavil je rast števila zaposlenih v javni upravi in povečano javno porabo, kar je postalo nevzdržno. Predlagal je davčno sidro kot rešitev za stabilnost. Tudi zbiranje podpisov za referendum o interventnem zakonu za razvoj Slovenije ocenil kot pomembno za prihodnji razvoj. Obljubil je podporo obrtnikom in podjetnikom ter izključitev nepotrebnih obremenitev, hkrati pa opozoril na blokade ukrepov strankami, ki nasprotujejo učinkovitim rešitvam.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Premier Janša's speech focusing on economic stability and challenges facing Slovenia. While he criticizes past governance and calls for reforms, the tone remains objective, balancing criticism with constructive proposals. The framing does not show clear ideological leaning but a
Why factuality (75): This article repeats similar claims about Slovenia's economic status relative to the EU average and highlights Janša's focus on fiscal stability through a 'tax shelter' mechanism. It also discusses public sector employment growth and calls for efficiency improvements. These points are consistent wit
Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a critical stance toward past government actions, suggesting they wasted opportunities. While not overtly biased, the phrasing implies dissatisfaction with previous leadership, which may influence reader perception.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
![[Video] Evil: Pigeon calls to persuade voters to reject a law that benefits them](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=nova24tv.si%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F10%2Fgolob-2.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
