ON
← Back to feed
Janković's Dubai in Ljubljana: 2.3 million euros for land, and the ski area is not going to be there for a long time?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives4 days ago

Janković's Dubai in Ljubljana: 2.3 million euros for land, and the ski area is not going to be there for a long time?

The city of Ljubljana, under mayor Zoran Janković, has approved the purchase of over 57,000 square meters of land in Podutik for nearly 2.3 million euros, primarily to expand an existing cycling park developed by the Cycling Society Rajd. The area was previously considered for a covered ski facility modeled after Dubai’s, but construction has been delayed since 2012 due to lack of investment. While the ski center remains a long-term possibility dependent on private funding, opposition members have criticized the project for being energy-intensive, environmentally damaging, and not aligned with the city’s sports strategy or development plans for 2026. The initial estimated cost of 73 million euros from 2012 may now be significantly higher due to rising construction costs.

The city council of Ljubljana has approved the purchase of over 57,000 square meters of land in Podutik for nearly 2.3 million euros, or 40 euros per square meter. This decision comes just before local elections and marks the latest development in a long-standing project known as the Nordic Centre Podutik, which includes plans for an indoor ski slope. However, the project, discussed for 14 years, raises more questions than answers at this stage. The idea of an indoor ski facility in Ljubljana was first introduced in 2012 during a real estate fair in Cannes. At that time, the investment was estimated at 73 million euros with completion projected by 2015. Construction, however, never began, leaving the plan on paper until recently. Now, the city's acquisition of land has reignited interest in the project. According to the city, expanding the existing cycling park in collaboration with the Cycling Society Rajd is currently the priority. An indoor ski slope remains a long-term possibility dependent largely on private investors. Mayor Zoran Janković told Dnevnik that the Nordic Centre will not be built during his tenure, mentioning 2045 as a potential year for realization, assuming an investor is found. Opposition members have raised concerns regarding costs and environmental impacts. Council member Vesna Denis Striković highlighted the energy inefficiency of an indoor ski slope, encroachment into forest areas, and other pressing urban needs. Council member Urška Honzak from the Left party noted that the project is not included in the city’s sports strategy or the 2026 development programs, demanding clearer explanations about timelines and costs. The city buys the land primarily for the expansion of the cycling park while keeping open the option of a much larger project. The actual cost of building an indoor ski slope remains uncertain, as the initial estimate of 73 million euros is now outdated due to rising construction costs. The decision to allocate nearly 2.3 million euros for the land has already been made.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Zanima.me logoZanima.meIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 754 days ago
Janković's Dubai in Ljubljana: 2.3 million euros for land, and the ski area is not going to be there for a long time?

The city of Ljubljana, under mayor Zoran Janković, has approved the purchase of over 57,000 square meters of land in Podutik for nearly 2.3 million euros, primarily to expand an existing cycling park developed by the Cycling Society Rajd. The area was previously considered for a covered ski facility modeled after Dubai’s, but construction has been delayed since 2012 due to lack of investment. While the ski center remains a long-term possibility dependent on private funding, opposition members have criticized the project for being energy-intensive, environmentally damaging, and not aligned with the city’s sports strategy or development plans for 2026. The initial estimated cost of 73 million euros from 2012 may now be significantly higher due to rising construction costs.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights criticism from the opposition regarding the environmental impact and misalignment with municipal priorities, suggesting a focus on potential negative consequences of the project rather than emphasizing its benefits. It frames the decision to buy land as a move toward a long-fo

Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details such as the purchase of 57,000 square meters of land for 2.3 million euros, the history of the project dating back to 2012, and quotes from officials like Zoran Janković. These facts align with the cross-source consensus and are well-supported by contextual info

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the topic fairly neutrally but includes some framing that emphasizes the delays and criticisms of the project, which may subtly favor the opposition viewpoint. The tone remains mostly objective but has slight leanings toward highlighting controversies.

+Portal (Portal Plus) logo+Portal (Portal Plus)IndependentProgressiveFactual 40Objective 308 days ago
Mr. Jankovic, you sound like Janša

The article discusses Marcel Štefančič, who hosts a clearly unbalanced show that directly violates the law governing RTV Slovenia. The piece suggests that Štefančič has turned his attention toward current Ljubljana mayor Zoran Janković. It remains unclear whether he will support candidates such as Anton Rop or Luka Mescic in the upcoming local elections in Ljubljana.

Bias read (Progressive): The article criticizes Štefančič for hosting an 'unbalanced' show and implies potential political alignment with Zoran Janković, a center-left figure, while questioning his support for other candidates. This framing leans left by suggesting bias against Štefančič and aligning with Janković.

Why factuality (40): The article contains unsubstantiated claims and lacks concrete factual support. It references an unspecified 'TVSLO1' as a source and makes vague allegations about Marcel Štefančič’s program being 'unbalanced.' There is no clear connection to the main event discussed in other articles, making it dif

Why objectivity (30): The article exhibits strong bias and uses emotionally charged language, comparing Zoran Janković to Janez Janša, which introduces a highly subjective and polemical tone. It also appears to engage in personal attacks rather than presenting a balanced view of the situation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories