ON
← Back to feed
James Packer pays $1.8m to law firm also defending Netanyahu’s corruption charges
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives

James Packer pays $1.8m to law firm also defending Netanyahu’s corruption charges

An investigative report reveals that Australian billionaire James Packer has transferred approximately $1.78 million to a Tel Aviv law firm that is currently defending Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in ongoing corruption trials. The payments, described as monthly retainers of $50,000, began in late 2024 and continue through 2026, originating from a bank account controlled by Packer’s company, Consolidated Press International. While Packer has not denied making these payments, his representatives claim the fees cover unrelated business services such as deal-finding in Israel rather than legal defense for the Prime Minister. However, a source familiar with the transactions argues the payments warrant urgent investigation because they may constitute an undisclosed benefit to Netanyahu, potentially violating Israeli laws regarding political funding and US regulations on foreign influence. Israeli authorities have previously restricted Netanyahu from accepting direct financial support from wealthy backers for his legal costs, raising concerns that routing funds through a law firm circumvents these restrictions. When asked for comment, a spokesperson for Netanyahu dismissed in

Australian billionaire James Packer has transferred at least 1.25 million US dollars, equivalent to approximately 1.78 million Australian dollars, to a Tel Aviv law firm currently defending Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. An investigative review conducted ahead of upcoming Israeli elections revealed a financial trail consisting of monthly wire transfers totaling 50,000 US dollars each. These payments occurred over a period of two years from a bank account controlled by Packer’s corporate entity to the account of Netanyahu’s legal defense team. The first such retainer payment was executed on September 23, 2024. It originated from a Citibank account belonging to Consolidated Press International, Packer’s firm, and was deposited into the accounts of the law firm Hadad Roth Shenhar at Israel’s Mizrahi Tefahot Bank. Packer has not denied making these regular payments. However, when contacted regarding the allegations, he declined to offer further comment. A source familiar with the financial dealings of the 59-year-old former media mogul stated that the wire transfers were intended to compensate the law firm for services rendered specifically to Packer. According to this source, the work included deal finding within Israel, where Packer holds business interests, and was entirely unrelated to the prime minister’s ongoing court proceedings. Despite requests for evidence of specific deals or documentation of work performed by the firm, neither Packer nor his company has responded to inquiries seeking clarification. A separate source, who is aware of the payments but lacks authorization to speak publicly, argued that the transfers warrant urgent investigation. This individual suggested the payments should be scrutinized to determine whether Netanyahu received an undisclosed benefit from Packer while the firm defended him against corruption charges. The core allegation in Netanyahu’s trial is that he unlawfully accepted expensive gifts from Packer and other wealthy supporters between 2014 and 2016. If it were established that Packer’s payments to the law firm directly or indirectly benefited the prime minister, the source alleged such actions could constitute new violations of Israeli laws regulating political support. Additionally, the payments might potentially fall under United States statutes governing financial transactions and benefits received by foreign politicians from private entities. Israeli authorities have previously blocked attempts by Netanyahu to receive direct funding from wealthy backers for his legal defense. Officials determined that relying on such external financiers would amount to a breach of trust and create a conflict of interest. Consequently, Netanyahu has unsuccessfully sought legal permission to allow his overseas associates to fund the defense through the law firm. The current arrangement appears to circumvent previous restrictions by routing payments through a corporate structure rather than direct personal donations. Hadad Roth Shenhar serves as the primary legal counsel for Netanyahu in multiple matters. Beyond the corruption trial involving Packer and film producer Arnon Milchan, the firm is assisting the prime minister in contesting allegations that he improperly traded favors with an Israeli newspaper publisher and a telecommunications company. Amit Hadad, the firm’s most senior partner, acts as Netanyahu’s lead defense attorney. Hadad has built a reputation representing various Israeli government ministers and prominent business figures, though Netanyahu remains his most high-profile client. He did not respond to questions regarding the nature of the fees being collected from Packer’s company. Reaction to the revelations came swiftly from political observers. When asked about the allegations on Monday morning, a spokesperson for Netanyahu dismissed the inquiry. The representative stated that the office had no interest in answering the questions due to the immediate pressures of the ongoing election campaign. Transparency International issued a statement indicating that Packer’s decision to remit 1.25 million US dollars to the firm defending Netanyahu demands urgent and independent scrutiny. The organization noted that given the existing significant corruption charges facing the prime minister, the timing and destination of these funds raise serious concerns. The financial relationship spans two years, with consistent monthly outflows from Packer’s corporate account. The investigation highlights the complex intersection of international business interests and domestic political litigation. While Packer maintains the payments were for commercial services, the coincidence of the recipient being the defense counsel in a case alleging illicit benefits from Packer creates a focal point for potential regulatory violation. Neither party has provided documentary proof of the commercial work allegedly performed during this period. The lack of response to requests for evidence leaves the exact scope of the legal services undefined. As the Israeli elections approach, the disclosure adds a layer of complexity to the public discourse surrounding Netanyahu’s legal battles and his relationships with foreign donors. The matter now awaits potential formal inquiry into whether the flow of funds constitutes an improper influence or a legitimate professional engagement.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
James Packer pays $1.8m to law firm also defending Netanyahu’s corruption charges

An investigative report reveals that Australian billionaire James Packer has transferred approximately $1.78 million to a Tel Aviv law firm that is currently defending Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in ongoing corruption trials. The payments, described as monthly retainers of $50,000, began in late 2024 and continue through 2026, originating from a bank account controlled by Packer’s company, Consolidated Press International. While Packer has not denied making these payments, his representatives claim the fees cover unrelated business services such as deal-finding in Israel rather than legal defense for the Prime Minister. However, a source familiar with the transactions argues the payments warrant urgent investigation because they may constitute an undisclosed benefit to Netanyahu, potentially violating Israeli laws regarding political funding and US regulations on foreign influence. Israeli authorities have previously restricted Netanyahu from accepting direct financial support from wealthy backers for his legal costs, raising concerns that routing funds through a law firm circumvents these restrictions. When asked for comment, a spokesperson for Netanyahu dismissed in

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the story around potential illegal conduct and ethical violations by a sitting head of state, emphasizing the 'money trail' and the urgency for investigation into whether the Prime Minister received undisclosed benefits. It highlights the dismissal of inquiries by the Prime Minis

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): The tone is investigative but restrained. While the headline uses strong phrasing ('pays... to law firm'), the body text carefully qualifies claims using phrases like 'allegations' and 'source alleged.' It presents the potential legal implications neutrally without injecting personal moral judgment.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
James Packer pays $1.8m to law firm also defending Netanyahu’s corruption charges

An investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald reveals that Australian billionaire James Packer has transferred approximately $1.78 million to a Tel Aviv law firm that is currently defending Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in ongoing corruption trials. The payments, described as monthly retainers of $50,000, began in September 2024 and have continued for two years via wire transfers from Packer’s company, Consolidated Press International. While Packer has not denied making these payments, his representatives claim the fees cover unrelated business services such as deal-finding in Israel rather than legal defense for the Prime Minister. However, sources close to the matter argue the transfers warrant urgent investigation because Israeli authorities have previously barred Netanyahu from using private funds for his legal defense, raising concerns that the payments constitute an undisclosed benefit. A spokesperson for Netanyahu dismissed inquiries regarding the allegations, stating the office was too focused on the upcoming elections to respond.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the story through a lens of potential illegality and ethical violation, emphasizing the conflict of interest between paying a lawyer who defends a politician accused of taking bribes from that same payer. By highlighting the 'money trail,' the contradiction between Packer's denial

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (90): Same analysis as Article 0. The writing remains dispassionate, relying on attributed sources rather than editorial commentary. The framing focuses on the mechanics of the payments and the legal questions they raise, avoiding inflammatory language.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories