ON
← Back to feed
Jail for man who collected over $28m from unlicensed money remittance services in Little India
SG🏛️ PoliticsCenter16 hr. ago

Jail for man who collected over $28m from unlicensed money remittance services in Little India

A Singaporean man named Raju Krishnamoorthi, 45, has been sentenced to nine months and seven weeks in prison for participating in an illegal money remittance scheme targeting migrant workers from India. Operating from a shophouse in Little India, Raju collected over $28 million from customers between February and April 2025. He worked under a man named Syed, helping facilitate illegal transfers by handling cash and using a sophisticated verification process involving $2 notes. Raju also ran his own remittance business separately, earning additional income. His involvement was discovered during a police raid on April 8, 2025, where over $314,000 was seized. The prosecution highlighted the organized nature of the scheme, noting its premeditated planning and use of an identification system.

A Singaporean man has been jailed for nine months and seven weeks after admitting to running an illegal money remittance business that generated over $28 million in revenue. The case involves Raju Krishnamoorthi, a 45-year-old Indian national who operated the scheme while holding an S Pass from another employer. Raju's involvement began in early 2022 when he met Syed, a man who ran an unlicensed money transfer service in a shophouse located in Little India. Raju agreed to assist Syed by managing cash transactions for customers seeking to remit funds to India. In return, he received a monthly payment of $1,500 and shared space in the shophouse. Over time, Raju expanded his role, eventually offering his own remittance services independently. Between February and April 2025, Raju collected more than $28 million from customers through both his collaboration with Syed and his personal operations. During peak periods, he reportedly handled up to $1 million in daily transactions. To manage different streams of income, Raju used two separate mobile phones, one with a local number for his own clients and another for Syed's customers. His earnings from independent operations exceeded $50,000. The scheme involved a complex process to verify the authenticity of the cash being transferred. Customers would hand over their ATM cards and PINs to Raju for safekeeping. When they wished to remit money back to India, they instructed Raju to withdraw funds from their accounts. Raju would relay this information to Syed, who coordinated with the customers to finalize the transfers. For actual cash remittances, Syed arranged for a third party to collect the money from Raju. This third party would then present a $2 note to Raju, which he compared against a similar note sent by Syed to confirm the transaction's legitimacy. Raju deducted his monthly salary from the cash he collected and used part of the proceeds to cover the $1,000 rent for the room he occupied in the shophouse. On April 8, 2025, authorities raided the premises and seized over $314,000 from Raju. The operation was described as highly sophisticated, with careful planning and execution. At trial, Raju pleaded guilty to two charges: conspiring to run an illegal cross-border money transfer business and abetting a false statement in a work pass application. He was also fined $60,000. Deputy Public Prosecutor Jordon Li highlighted the level of organization and foresight involved in the operation, noting that Raju had implemented an identification system using $2 notes to ensure the integrity of each transaction. The case underscores the risks associated with operating unlicensed financial services, particularly in areas such as Little India, where many migrant workers rely on informal networks for remittances. Authorities continue to investigate the broader implications of such activities and are likely to intensify efforts to crack down on illicit financial practices. The sentencing marks a significant step in addressing these issues within the region.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Straits Times logoThe Straits TimesParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 8516 hr. ago
Jail for man who collected over $28m from unlicensed money remittance services in Little India

A Singaporean man named Raju Krishnamoorthi, 45, has been sentenced to nine months and seven weeks in prison for participating in an illegal money remittance scheme targeting migrant workers from India. Operating from a shophouse in Little India, Raju collected over $28 million from customers between February and April 2025. He worked under a man named Syed, helping facilitate illegal transfers by handling cash and using a sophisticated verification process involving $2 notes. Raju also ran his own remittance business separately, earning additional income. His involvement was discovered during a police raid on April 8, 2025, where over $314,000 was seized. The prosecution highlighted the organized nature of the scheme, noting its premeditated planning and use of an identification system.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual legal case without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the criminal activity and judicial outcome without emphasizing political agendas or partisan perspectives. The narrative remains neutral regarding the broader implications of illegal remittance services or the

Why factuality (75): The article provides specific details such as the amount collected ($28 million), the time frame (February–April 2025), the sentence (nine months and seven weeks), and the nature of the illegal activity (unlicensed money remittance). These facts appear consistent with what might be expected from a l

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, focusing on the facts of the case, the charges, and the court’s decision. It avoids overtly emotional language or bias but does include some narrative elements typical of news reporting, which slightly reduces neutrality.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories