ON
← Back to feed
Bridal shop employee faces jail time for defrauding dozens of brides, court hears
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Bridal shop employee faces jail time for defrauding dozens of brides, court hears

A 53-year-old bridal shop employee, Dominique Marianne Rolland, faces potential jail time after being accused of defrauding dozens of brides and a debutante over a two-year period. The Cairns Magistrates Court initially refused to accept her guilty plea, citing concerns that the offense warranted a longer prison sentence than the court could impose. Rolland allegedly worked at Jonovia Bridal, where she participated in fraudulent activities involving deposits paid by brides and their families for wedding dresses. The total amount of fraud is estimated at $121,482, affecting around 62 brides and 12 family members. While Rolland was ready to plead guilty, the magistrate ruled the case required further proceedings in the District Court, which has broader sentencing authority. The shop owner, Alison Helen Davies, is also under investigation for similar allegations and is expected to face trial.

Narelle Labuts, a 61-year-old former accountant for a company that operated IGA supermarkets in New South Wales, has received a jail sentence for defrauding nearly $878,000 from her employer. Labuts was found guilty of stealing the money through fraudulent accounting practices and later admitting to losing almost all of it through gambling. She was sentenced to three and a half years in prison with a two-year non-parole period at the Newcastle District Court on Wednesday. The case highlights how a seemingly minor breach of trust escalated into a major criminal enterprise involving sophisticated methods to conceal the theft. Labuts worked for the Singh Group, which owns 10 IGA stores in the Hunter Valley region. Her role allowed her access to sensitive financial information, which she exploited over a four-year period. According to court proceedings, she manipulated 522 transactions by using white font to obscure the nature of the withdrawals. This method enabled her to siphon off large sums without immediate detection. In 2021, her actions were uncovered when a bank flagged an unusual transaction, leading to her termination from the company. Following her dismissal, Labuts faced legal action. Police charged her in October 2024 with obtaining financial advantage by deception and creating false documents to secure such advantages. She entered a plea of guilty late last year, acknowledging her wrongdoing before the court. During the sentencing hearing, Judge Tim Gartelmann SC noted that what initially appeared as an opportunistic act evolved into a well-planned scheme requiring substantial organisation. He emphasized the need for strict penalties to deter similar crimes, stating that fraud is often easy to commit yet difficult to detect. During the trial, Labuts admitted that she had only managed to repay a small portion of the stolen funds, $3,500—and that the IGA network recovered an additional $9,000 by withholding her entitlements. She explained that approximately 90 percent of the embezzled amount had been spent on gambling, primarily on poker machines. When questioned about the remaining $80,000, she confessed that she could not account for its whereabouts. Labuts expressed remorse for her actions, acknowledging that she had betrayed the trust placed in her by her employer. Despite her admission of guilt, Labuts claimed that she was seeking help for her gambling addiction, having started counseling sessions in June 2022. However, she disputed the Crown’s assertion that her pursuit of treatment was solely motivated by being caught. She indicated that she would likely inform future employers about her conviction, recognizing that it was now public knowledge. Her defense lawyer, Stephen Hopper, underscored her efforts to address her addiction and seek professional assistance. Labuts has since taken up work as a bookkeeper for a transport and a concreting company. However, she did not elaborate on the circumstances surrounding her sudden departure from the IGA network. She is set to become eligible for parole in July 2028, according to the terms of her sentence. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of financial misconduct and the personal toll it can take on individuals who find themselves ensnared in cycles of addiction and deceit.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 88yesterday
Jail for acccountant who gambled away $878,000 stolen from IGA

Accountant Narelle Labuts, 61, has been sentenced to three and a half years in prison for embezzling $878,000 from the Singh Group, which operates IGA supermarkets in New South Wales. Labuts used her position to siphon funds over four years, hiding her actions through 522 transactions with white font. She admitted to losing most of the money to gambling, though she could not account for the remaining $80,000. Labuts was dismissed in 2021 after a suspicious transaction was flagged. The court noted the crime started as opportunistic but escalated to require significant planning. Labuts expressed remorse and mentioned ongoing counseling for her gambling addiction, but failed to disclose her termination from the IGA network to future employers.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal case without overt ideological framing. While the subject involves legal accountability and corporate governance, the tone remains neutral, focusing on the individual's actions rather than broader political implications. There is no evident slant,

Why factuality (95): The article provides detailed information about Narelle Labuts' sentencing, including the amount stolen ($878,000), the duration of the fraud (four years), the method used (white font on transactions), and the charges brought against her. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that she was convic

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the facts in a straightforward manner but includes some emotionally charged language such as 'spiralled into something "that required significant planning and organising"' and 'easy to commit and hard to detect.' These phrases suggest a moral judgment about the nature of the cri

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenter5 hr. ago
Bridal shop employee faces jail time for defrauding dozens of brides, court hears

A 53-year-old bridal shop employee, Dominique Marianne Rolland, faces potential jail time after being accused of defrauding dozens of brides and a debutante over a two-year period. The Cairns Magistrates Court initially refused to accept her guilty plea, citing concerns that the offense warranted a longer prison sentence than the court could impose. Rolland allegedly worked at Jonovia Bridal, where she participated in fraudulent activities involving deposits paid by brides and their families for wedding dresses. The total amount of fraud is estimated at $121,482, affecting around 62 brides and 12 family members. While Rolland was ready to plead guilty, the magistrate ruled the case required further proceedings in the District Court, which has broader sentencing authority. The shop owner, Alison Helen Davies, is also under investigation for similar allegations and is expected to face trial.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings and does not take a clear ideological stance. It reports on the judicial decision-making process and the allegations against the individuals involved without apparent bias toward either side of the political spectrum.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories