ON
← Back to feed
Israel has cut ties with the head of European diplomacy over comparisons to apartheid
World🏛️ PoliticsOverlooked from the left15 days ago

Israel has cut ties with the head of European diplomacy over comparisons to apartheid

Israel has decided to cut all contacts with European Union High Representative Kaja Kallas following her comparison of Israeli policy to apartheid in South Africa. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called her remarks 'blood libel' and stated that she did not refute or clarify them, leading to Israel's decision to end communication with her. This comes amid heightened tensions between Israel and parts of the EU over the Gaza war, violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, and calls for stricter measures against Israel. Within the EU, there have been discussions about possible sanctions,但

The recent escalation in diplomatic tensions between Israel and the European Union reached a new level when Israel’s Foreign Minister, Gideon Saar, announced the severance of all communication with the EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas. The dispute stems from alleged remarks made by Kallas during her visit to Mexico, where she reportedly compared Israel to the apartheid regime that governed South Africa. This comparison, according to Saar, constitutes a serious accusation against Israel, one he described as a "blood libel." The incident marks another significant blow to the already strained relationship between Israel and the EU, particularly in light of ongoing conflicts and political divisions within the bloc.

The breakdown in communication began after reports surfaced about Kallas’ comments during her diplomatic engagement in Mexico. According to Saar, these remarks were not only offensive but also lacked any form of clarification or denial from Kallas herself. In a public statement, Saar criticized Kallas for acting "obsessively and with blatant unfairness" towards Israel, emphasizing that such statements undermine the legitimacy of the Israeli state. He further stated that without a retraction, he would have no choice but to cut off all contact with her. This decision reflects a broader pattern of increasing hostility from certain quarters of the EU toward Israel, especially following the outbreak of hostilities in Gaza in October 2023 and subsequent incidents involving Israeli settlers in the West Bank.

The situation has deepened existing rifts between Israel and parts of the EU, which have grown more pronounced over the past year. The EU has increasingly expressed concern over human rights violations in the occupied territories, including the treatment of Palestinian civilians and the actions of Israeli settlers. These concerns have led to calls for sanctions against individuals and entities deemed responsible for such acts. However, there remains no consensus among EU member states on the extent or nature of these measures. Some nations advocate for stricter policies, while others remain more cautious, highlighting the internal divisions within the bloc.

Kallas, as the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, has faced mounting pressure from both sides of the Atlantic. While she has publicly acknowledged the lack of agreement among EU members on issues related to Israel, she has also maintained a firm stance on human rights and international law. Her comments in Mexico appear to align with a growing trend of European officials using historical analogies to critique Israeli policies, drawing parallels between current events and past injustices. Such comparisons, however, are often met with strong opposition from Israeli leaders, who argue that they are not only inaccurate but also harmful to national sovereignty and democratic principles.

In addition to the immediate fallout from Kallas’ remarks, the incident underscores the broader geopolitical implications of the Israel-EU relationship. As tensions continue to rise, the potential for further diplomatic friction increases, particularly given the upcoming European elections and the shifting political landscape within the EU. The EU’s position on Israel is likely to become even more polarized, with some member states pushing for stronger condemnation of Israeli actions, while others seek to maintain closer ties with Tel Aviv. This divergence could lead to a fragmentation of the EU’s unified approach to Middle Eastern affairs, complicating efforts to achieve a lasting peace in the region.

Looking ahead, the consequences of this diplomatic rupture will depend largely on how both parties navigate the crisis. For Israel, the loss of direct communication with Kallas represents a strategic setback, potentially affecting its ability to engage effectively with the EU on critical issues. Meanwhile, the EU faces the challenge of balancing its commitment to human rights with the need to preserve diplomatic relationships with key partners. Whether this conflict leads to long-term estrangement or serves as a catalyst for renewed dialogue remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the Israel-EU relationship is at a crossroads, shaped by deepening ideological divides and escalating political tensions.

3 reports

South China Morning Post logoSouth China Morning PostIndependentRightFactual 96Objective 8515 days ago
Israel’s foreign minister cuts ties with top EU diplomat over ‘apartheid’ remark

Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Saar, announced that he would cut ties with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas following reports that she compared Israel to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The decision comes amid heightened tensions between Israel and the EU, exacerbated by the ongoing Gaza war and incidents involving Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Saar criticized Kallas for making 'severe' comments without providing any clarification.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the EU diplomat's comparison of Israel to an apartheid regime as a 'severe statement,' and emphasizes the Israeli minister's accusation of 'blatant unfairness' and 'obsessive' behavior toward Israel. The language used supports the perspective that the EU is biased against Israel,

Why these scores (Factual 96 · Objective 85): This article provides a clear and factual account of the situation, citing Gideon Saar's statements and the context of strained relations. It avoids strong emotional language and presents the facts neutrally, though it does not explicitly mention the exact wording of Kallas' comments.

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 7015 days ago
Israel accuses EU's top diplomat of 'blood libel' and severs ties

Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Saar, accused the European Union's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, of making a 'blood libel' by comparing Israel to the apartheid regime in South Africa. Saar stated that Kallas had acted 'obsessively and with blatant unfairness toward the State of Israel' and announced that Israel would sever all ties with her until she retracted the alleged slur.

Bias read (Right): The article presents Israeli officials' accusations against the EU's top diplomat using strong language such as 'blood libel,' which frames the EU representative's remarks as deeply offensive and historically sensitive. The framing emphasizes the severity of the accusation without providing counter-

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports Israel's foreign minister accusing the EU's top diplomat of making a 'blood libel' by comparing Israel to South Africa's apartheid regime. The claim is supported by quotes from Saar and his social media post. However, the article does not present counterpoints or conte

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 7815 days ago
Israel has cut ties with the head of European diplomacy over comparisons to apartheid

Israel has decided to cut all contacts with European Union High Representative Kaja Kallas following her comparison of Israeli policy to apartheid in South Africa. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called her remarks 'blood libel' and stated that she did not refute or clarify them, leading to Israel's decision to end communication with her. This comes amid heightened tensions between Israel and parts of the EU over the Gaza war, violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, and calls for stricter measures against Israel. Within the EU, there have been discussions about possible sanctions,但

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on an official diplomatic decision and includes quotes from both Israeli officials and EU representatives, providing a balanced perspective.

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 78): The article accurately reports the claim that Israel's foreign minister cut ties with Kaja Kallas due to her alleged comparison of Israel to apartheid. The details align with the SCMP article and cross-source consensus. However, the headline uses emotionally charged language like 'KRIVNA KLEVETA' wh

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories