ON
← Back to feed
'It upsets me that my children still see their stepdad'
United Kingdom🏛️ Politicsyesterday

'It upsets me that my children still see their stepdad'

A reader writes to Coleen about struggling with her children continuing to see their stepfather after her divorce, despite her efforts to move on from the relationship. The reader describes her ex-husband as selfish and controlling, and feels hurt that her adult children visit him behind her back and post photos of him online. She worries they don't understand the difficulties she faced during the marriage and fears her ex is influencing them. Coleen advises the mother not to let her children's relationship with their stepfather define her emotional state and suggests having an honest conversation with them about how the situation affects her. Coleen emphasizes that while the children have built a bond with their stepfather, they still love their mother and encourages open communication rather than confrontation.

A mother writes to columnist Coleen Taylor expressing deep distress over her adult children's ongoing contact with her estranged ex-partner. The letter, published in The Daily Mirror on July 22, 2026, describes a situation where two children, now in their early 20s, continue to visit their father despite the dissolution of the marriage. The woman claims the visits occur behind her back and involve attendance at family gatherings. She feels betrayed by the lack of communication from her children, who post photographs with their stepfather on social media, further upsetting her. Her daughter defends the actions, stating that the ex was their stepfather for eight years and questioning why they should stop seeing him. Coleen Taylor responds directly to the letter, advising the writer not to let the dynamics between her children and the ex define her emotional state. She emphasizes the importance of rebuilding one's life post-divorce and encourages the mother to prioritize her own well-being. Taylor suggests engaging in open dialogue with her children to help them understand the impact of their interactions with the ex. She acknowledges that the children may not fully grasp the difficulties the mother faced during the marriage and urges patience, noting that they are mature enough to consider the emotional toll on their mother. Taylor highlights the complexity of maintaining relationships after a divorce, especially when children are involved. She stresses that while the children have formed a bond with the ex, this does not negate the mother's role in their lives. The columnist recommends fostering honest conversations and encouraging the children to reflect on how their actions might affect the mother emotionally. She reassures the mother that her children still love her and that she will not lose them, even if their relationship with the ex continues. The letter underscores broader themes of parental influence, emotional resilience, and the challenges of navigating post-divorce family dynamics. It reflects the common struggle many parents face when dealing with the lingering effects of past relationships. The mother expresses frustration that her children seem to overlook the pain caused by the marriage and the effort she has invested in moving forward. She fears that her ex may be influencing her children's views, leading them to believe that the separation was her fault rather than his. Taylor's response offers both empathy and practical guidance. She recognizes the emotional weight of the situation and encourages the mother to focus on self-care. By suggesting open discussions and honest reflection, she aims to empower the mother to reclaim her narrative without losing connection with her children. The advice aligns with psychological principles that emphasize the importance of communication and emotional support in healing from familial trauma. The exchange provides insight into the delicate balance between respecting children's autonomy and protecting their emotional well-being. It also highlights the potential for misunderstandings in post-divorce households, where past grievances can shape present interactions. As the mother seeks clarity and support, the conversation serves as a reminder of the enduring power of maternal bonds, even amid complex family transitions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Daily Mirror logoDaily MirrorIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
'It upsets me that my children still see their stepdad'

A reader writes to Coleen about struggling with her children continuing to see their stepfather after her divorce, despite her efforts to move on from the relationship. The reader describes her ex-husband as selfish and controlling, and feels hurt that her adult children visit him behind her back and post photos of him online. She worries they don't understand the difficulties she faced during the marriage and fears her ex is influencing them. Coleen advises the mother not to let her children's relationship with their stepfather define her emotional state and suggests having an honest conversation with them about how the situation affects her. Coleen emphasizes that while the children have built a bond with their stepfather, they still love their mother and encourages open communication rather than confrontation.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses personal family dynamics and emotional challenges related to divorce and co-parenting. While it involves familial relationships, there is no direct political controversy, ideological conflict, or policy debate. The content focuses on individual experiences and advice, making it

Why factuality (85): The article presents a personal letter to Coleen asking for advice on dealing with children continuing to see an ex-partner. It does not make factual claims about the event itself, as it is a hypothetical scenario based on a reader's question. Factuality is judged against the cross-source consensus,

Why objectivity (70): The tone is empathetic and advisory, focusing on emotional support rather than objective analysis. While it acknowledges the reader's feelings, it leans into emotional framing by emphasizing the impact on the parent-child relationship. There is no attempt to present multiple perspectives or balance

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories