ON
← Back to feed
'It's not a luxury': Government urged to end 23% VAT on sunscreen
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsProgressive10 hr. ago

'It's not a luxury': Government urged to end 23% VAT on sunscreen

Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín, who was diagnosed with melanoma in 2020, is calling on the Irish government to remove the 23% VAT on sunscreen products during its upcoming EU presidency. He argues that sunscreen is a necessary health product, not a luxury, and that taxing it effectively hinders skin cancer prevention efforts. Skin cancer is the most common cancer in Ireland, with over 11,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and nine out of ten cases are linked to UV exposure. Tóibín highlights that Ireland has previously successfully advocated for zero-rating on other essential items like menstrual products and children's clothing, suggesting similar action could be taken for sunscreen. However, Tánaiste Simon Harris noted that under current EU VAT laws, sunscreen is classified as a cosmetic product, limiting options for tax reductions.

Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín has called on the Irish government to remove the 23% value-added tax (VAT) on sunscreen products, arguing that the tax effectively penalizes efforts to prevent skin cancer. Tóibín, who was diagnosed with melanoma in 2020, described the tax as a barrier to public health and urged the government to leverage its upcoming role as the EU presidency to push for a zero-VAT rate on sunscreen. Tóibín revealed that his diagnosis came after a routine checkup following a seemingly minor injury. He explained that the melanoma was discovered on his scalp by his brother while he bent over to tie his shoes. Initially dismissing the spot as a scratch, Tóibín eventually sought medical attention and was diagnosed with a serious form of skin cancer. His experience has led him to advocate for policy changes that align with public health recommendations. He pointed out that skin cancer is the most prevalent form of cancer in Ireland, with over 11,000 new cases diagnosed annually. According to Tóibín, nine out of every ten skin cancers are linked to ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Despite this, the state continues to impose a 23% VAT on sunscreen, which he argues is both counterproductive and unjust. Tóibín emphasized that sunscreen is not a discretionary purchase but a necessary health measure. Public health authorities recommend its regular use for families, outdoor workers, children, and elderly individuals. He stated that the current VAT structure creates a financial disincentive for people to adopt preventive measures against a disease that is increasingly prevalent. In previous years, Ireland has successfully lobbied for changes to EU VAT regulations, including the removal of VAT on menstrual products and the zero-rating of items such as children’s clothing, oral medications, and solar panels. Tóibín suggested that similar action could be taken regarding sunscreen, particularly for products with SPF30 and higher, which offer greater protection against UV damage. During the next six months, as Ireland holds the EU presidency, Tóibín believes the government has a unique opportunity to rally support among member states for revising the VAT Directive. He stressed that the rising incidence of skin cancer and ongoing public health campaigns advocating UV protection underscore the urgency of addressing the tax burden on sunscreen. However, Tánaiste Simon Harris has previously informed the Dáil that, under current EU VAT law, sunscreen is classified as a cosmetic or toiletry product, making it ineligible for a reduced VAT rate. While the government engaged with the European Commission in 2023, the commission concluded that applying a lower tax rate to sun protection products is not feasible under existing regulations. Despite these legal constraints, Tóibín maintains that the situation warrants further examination. He noted that public sentiment and growing awareness of skin cancer risks could influence future discussions on tax policy. A recent poll questioned whether the cost of sunscreen makes consumers hesitant to buy it, highlighting the potential impact of taxation on consumer behavior. As the debate continues, the focus remains on how best to balance fiscal responsibility with public health priorities. The outcome of discussions during the EU presidency will determine whether Ireland can secure a change in the VAT treatment of sunscreen, potentially offering long-term benefits for both individual health and broader societal well-being.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7510 hr. ago
'It's not a luxury': Government urged to end 23% VAT on sunscreen

Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín, who was diagnosed with melanoma in 2020, is calling on the Irish government to remove the 23% VAT on sunscreen products during its upcoming EU presidency. He argues that sunscreen is a necessary health product, not a luxury, and that taxing it effectively hinders skin cancer prevention efforts. Skin cancer is the most common cancer in Ireland, with over 11,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and nine out of ten cases are linked to UV exposure. Tóibín highlights that Ireland has previously successfully advocated for zero-rating on other essential items like menstrual products and children's clothing, suggesting similar action could be taken for sunscreen. However, Tánaiste Simon Harris noted that under current EU VAT laws, sunscreen is classified as a cosmetic product, limiting options for tax reductions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a call for policy change regarding VAT on sunscreen, emphasizing public health concerns and advocating for a shift in EU regulations. It frames the current tax as a barrier to health prevention and aligns with progressive arguments for reducing costs on essential health products

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín's diagnosis with melanoma in 2020 and his advocacy for removing VAT on sunscreen. It provides specific details about the current 23% VAT rate and references past successful EU VAT rule changes like menstrual products. The information aligns w

Why objectivity (75): The article presents Tóibín's personal experience and advocacy in a clear manner, but uses emotionally charged language such as 'tax on skin cancer prevention' which may influence reader perception. While factual, it frames the issue from a political advocacy perspective rather than presenting a neu

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories