Israeli veterans’ visit attracts controversy as calls grow for investigation into Zomi Frankcom killing

Israeli veterans are drawing criticism as they prepare to take part in a charity marathon in Sydney, amid mounting pressure for an international investigation into the death of Australian aid worker Zomi Frankcom. The controversy follows the deadly 2024 Israeli airstrike that killed Frankcom and six others while they were delivering food in Gaza through the World Central Kitchen convoy. Calls for a joint criminal probe involving Australia, Britain and Canada have intensified, with lawmakers and advocacy groups urging the governments to act. The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN) recently raised concerns with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke over the participation of Israeli military veterans in Sunday's Sydney Marathon. These veterans, some of whom have recently served in Gaza and Lebanon, are participating in the event as part of a charity fundraiser. APAN argues that the presence of these individuals raises questions about accountability and transparency, especially given the ongoing scrutiny surrounding the airstrike that claimed Frankcom's life. Frankcom, an Australian citizen, was one of seven aid workers killed during the Israeli airstrike on the World Central Kitchen convoy. International law experts have urged Australia, Britain and Canada to consider launching an MH17-style investigation into the incident. Such an approach would mirror the process used following the 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, which led to a comprehensive international inquiry. Israeli authorities have so far refused to press charges related to the attack. Foreign Minister Penny Wong is scheduled to meet with members of the Frankcom family soon to discuss the government’s response to the situation. Independent MP Zali Steggall has called for urgent consideration of an international investigation, emphasizing the importance of consulting with the family. She described Frankcom’s actions as vital humanitarian efforts, highlighting the gravity of her loss. Steggall, who has been a vocal advocate for Frankcom’s case, believes that an independent investigation could provide clarity and hold those responsible accountable. She noted that such an inquiry would allow for the independent testing of evidence and determination of culpability. Similarly, Independent Senator David Pocock has endorsed the proposal, suggesting that an MH17-style investigation could enable criminal prosecutions, even in absentia, offering a path toward justice for Frankcom and her family. Chris Sidoti, a member of the United Nations commission of inquiry into Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, supports the push for a more thorough and independent investigation. He argues that such a process would offer greater transparency compared to previous efforts. However, not all legal experts agree with the call for a joint criminal investigation. Associate Professor Carrie McDougall, a former Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade lawyer and current professor at Melbourne Law School, has expressed skepticism. While acknowledging the severity of Frankcom’s death, she contends that the available evidence does not substantiate claims of a war crime. McDougall notes that it is improbable that a member of the Australian Defence Force would face prosecution under similar circumstances. Despite her reservations about singling out the deaths of Australian citizens, McDougall admits that the Israeli military has undoubtedly committed war crimes in Gaza. She expresses discomfort with Western nations taking extraordinary measures in response to the loss of their nationals, particularly when large numbers of Palestinians have also been affected by the conflict. Greens Senator David Shoebridge has supported the idea of a joint investigation, likening it to the process that followed the MH17 incident. However, he acknowledges the need for realism, noting that the MH17 investigation had the backing of a unanimous UN Security Council resolution. As the debate continues, the outcome of discussions with the Frankcom family and potential legislative action will shape the next steps in addressing the broader implications of the airstrike.