ON
← Back to feed
Israel's Ben-Gvir Advocates Killing '30 To 40' Palestinians In Gaza A Night
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives7 days ago

Israel's Ben-Gvir Advocates Killing '30 To 40' Palestinians In Gaza A Night

An Israeli minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, expressed support for killing between 30 to 40 Palestinians in Gaza each night during a conversation with a former hostage, which was reported by Palestinian media. Ben-Gvir, part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, criticized the reduction in airstrikes against Gaza, arguing that many residents are not deserving of life. His remarks echo previous controversial statements and have been cited as potential evidence of genocidal intent by international bodies. While Israel denies such allegations, Ben-Gvir's influence has grown significantly, particularly amid rising tensions following Hamas' 2023 attack. He controls key aspects of Israel's security system, including prisons and police, and faces legal challenges over conditions in detention facilities.

An Israeli minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has openly called for the killing of “30 to 40” people in Gaza each night, remarks that emerged this weekend and were swiftly disseminated by Palestinian media. The comments were made by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s minister of national security, during a conversation with Rom Braslavski, a former hostage held by Hamas in Gaza. Their discussion centered around Israel’s response to the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which claimed the lives of approximately 1,200 Israelis and resulted in the capture of 251 people. Ben-Gvir expressed his disagreement with Netanyahu’s approach to the conflict, stating that he believes targeted assassinations should continue in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of 30 to 40 individuals per night. He added that these killings would not be restricted to those posing an immediate threat, asserting that certain individuals in Gaza are “not worthy of life” and “are not even people.” His remarks align with previous controversial statements attributed to him, which critics argue could be interpreted as evidence of genocidal intent. Israel has consistently denied allegations of committing genocide in Gaza. Domestic Israeli media has largely avoided extensive coverage of Ben-Gvir’s comments, reflecting a broader trend of increased visibility for far-right figures ahead of the upcoming Israeli elections on October 27. This shift in public sentiment follows the Hamas attack, during which many captured Israelis endured prolonged periods of starvation, physical and psychological abuse, and in some instances, sexual violence. As the nation’s minister of national security, Ben-Gvir holds oversight of Israel’s police force and prisons, where thousands of Palestinians from both Gaza and the West Bank are detained. While he lacks direct authority over the military and cannot issue orders for airstrikes in Gaza, his influence has grown significantly in recent years. After spending decades on the fringes of Israel’s far-right movement, he is now considered one of the country’s most powerful figures. Ben-Gvir has previously drawn criticism for reducing food rations given to Palestinian detainees. In 2025, Israel’s highest court ruled that the prison system under his leadership had deprived Palestinians of a basic subsistence diet. His recent criticisms of the reduction in Israeli airstrikes against Gaza have further fueled tensions with the government, particularly after reports indicated that the authority to conduct such operations had been centralized under the army’s chief of staff. During the same recorded exchange, Ben-Gvir proposed the mass emigration of Palestinians from Gaza, a plan that legal experts suggest could constitute ethnic cleansing. He envisioned the area being repopulated by Israelis, echoing sentiments reminiscent of Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005, when the country dismantled the Gush Katif settlement bloc and removed its military presence. Ben-Gvir emphasized that while he supported the departure of Gazans, he opposed any possibility of escape for Hamas fighters, advocating instead for their elimination. U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest proposal involves Hamas progressively relinquishing its arms while Israeli forces cease attacks and begin withdrawing from Gaza. Although Hamas has accepted the deal, the group has tied the surrender of its heavy weaponry to the establishment of a Palestinian state, a condition that Israel’s current administration and most of its political elite firmly oppose. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing negotiations and shifting dynamics influencing the trajectory of the conflict.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedConservativeFactual 90Objective 607 days ago
Israel's Ben-Gvir advocates killing '30 to 40' people in Gaza nightly

An Israeli minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, expressed support for killing between 30 to 40 people in Gaza each night during a conversation with a former hostage, which was later shared by Palestinian media. Ben-Gvir, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, criticized the reduction in airstrikes against Gaza, arguing that many residents are not deserving of life. His remarks align with his known far-right ideology and reflect growing influence within Israeli politics ahead of upcoming elections. While Israel denies any genocidal intent, past statements by Ben-Gvir have been used as evidence in international legal proceedings. Although Israeli media has largely ignored the comments, they highlight the increasing prominence of extreme views in the country's political landscape.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Ben-Gvir's advocacy for lethal actions in Gaza as part of a broader discussion on Israeli security policies and political trends. The emphasis on his influence and alignment with right-wing ideologies, along with the context of increased support for figures like him post-Hamas袭击,傾

Why factuality (90): This article closely aligns with the primary source document, accurately reporting Ben-Gvir's comments on the podcast and providing context about his role in the government. It includes relevant historical information about his past actions and the current political climate. However, it could have i

Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but still uses terms like 'extremist Israeli lawmaker' and 'genocidal intent,' which may imply a biased perspective. It provides minimal counterbalance to the claims made by Ben-Gvir, focusing primarily on condemnation rather than presenting multiple v

Associated Press logoAssociated PressIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 657 days ago
Israel's Ben-Gvir advocates killing '30 to 40' people in Gaza nightly while speaking to ex-hostage

Israeli Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir was recorded advocating for the killing of 30 to 40 people in Gaza each night during a conversation with an Israeli hostage who had been released by Hamas. The remarks were made in the context of ongoing tensions between Israel and Hamas, with Ben-Gvir expressing support for military actions against Palestinian targets. The statement has drawn significant attention and criticism, highlighting the intense nature of the conflict and the controversial positions held by some Israeli officials. The comments were reportedly made during a private discussion, raising questions about the rhetoric used by high-ranking officials in relation to civilian casualties.

Bias read (Conservative): The article reports on a high-ranking Israeli official making extreme and violent statements regarding potential civilian casualties in Gaza. The framing emphasizes the official’s rhetoric without providing counterpoints or balancing perspectives, which aligns with a right-leaning narrative that may

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Ben-Gvir's advocacy for killing 30-40 people in Gaza nightly, citing his remarks on a podcast with a former hostage. However, it lacks specific details about the context of the conversation, such as whether the remarks were made in jest or seriously. The article refere

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the claim as a direct quote from Ben-Gvir but uses emotionally charged language such as 'extremist Israeli lawmaker' and 'genocidal intent,' which may introduce bias. While it mentions Israel's denial of genocide, it doesn't provide counterpoints or balance the narrative effecti

HuffPost logoHuffPostIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 557 days ago
Israel's Ben-Gvir Advocates Killing '30 To 40' Palestinians In Gaza A Night

An Israeli minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, expressed support for killing between 30 to 40 Palestinians in Gaza each night during a conversation with a former hostage, which was reported by Palestinian media. Ben-Gvir, part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, criticized the reduction in airstrikes against Gaza, arguing that many residents are not deserving of life. His remarks echo previous controversial statements and have been cited as potential evidence of genocidal intent by international bodies. While Israel denies such allegations, Ben-Gvir's influence has grown significantly, particularly amid rising tensions following Hamas' 2023 attack. He controls key aspects of Israel's security system, including prisons and police, and faces legal challenges over conditions in detention facilities.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Ben-Gvir's statements as extreme but presents them as part of a broader political discourse. The emphasis on his growing influence and alignment with hardline policies suggests a rightward leaning perspective. The article highlights his role in shaping Israel's security policies,雖

Why factuality (80): The article accurately conveys Ben-Gvir's controversial remarks and their context. However, it lacks depth in explaining the broader implications of these statements or how they fit into Ben-Gvir's overall record. Some details from the primary source are omitted, such as the specific nature of the p

Why objectivity (55): The article exhibits a clear bias towards condemning Ben-Gvir's statements, using strong language like 'advocates killing' and referencing the UN's world court without providing a balanced view. It fails to present alternative perspectives or contextualize the remarks within the larger discourse sur

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories