ON
← Back to feed
Hamas has moved toward disarming - now it's up to Israel
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenter23 days ago

Hamas has moved toward disarming - now it's up to Israel

The article discusses Donald Trump's 'Board of Peace' initiative aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a 20-point plan focused on Gaza's reconstruction and Palestinian self-determination. While the plan includes proposals like demilitarization of Gaza and economic development, critics argue it lacks credibility due to unrealistic goals and Trump's controversial approach. The piece highlights skepticism towards Trump's vision, noting his history of making grandiose claims and the questionable nature of his AI-generated plans for Gaza. It also addresses recent claims by Trump that Hamas has agreed to complete disarmament, while noting that Hamas officials have not officially confirmed this and emphasize the need for reciprocal Israeli actions before committing to such terms.

An Israeli official confirmed on Sunday that the country will permit a multinational security force to enter Gaza, as outlined in former U.S. President Donald Trump's proposed ceasefire plan for the territory. This decision comes just one day ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's departure for Washington, where he is expected to meet with Trump on Tuesday. Netanyahu’s security cabinet approved the legal framework necessary for the force’s entry into Gaza during a meeting on Sunday. The mission, referred to as the International Stabilisation Force, is intended to consist of 200 personnel from “friendly countries such as Uganda and Morocco.” These individuals will be deployed in regions not under Israeli jurisdiction. Each group must receive separate approval from Israel prior to entering Gaza. However, there is currently no indication of when these forces will begin their operations. Gaza continues to face severe challenges following two years of conflict initiated by Hamas-led attacks on Israel in October 2023. Much of the territory remains in disarray, with extensive damage inflicted by Israeli military actions. A ceasefire agreement reached in October led to the proposal of Trump’s peace plan, which includes increased humanitarian assistance, civilian governance by Palestinian technocrats, the disarmament of Hamas, and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. Despite these proposals, progress has been limited, and the Palestinian civilian administration body, known as the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, has yet to establish itself within the territory. Israel maintains control over approximately 64 percent of Gaza, while the majority of its two million inhabitants reside on a narrow coastal strip under Hamas control. Conditions in this area remain dire, with many residents living in temporary shelters or damaged structures. Hamas has not yet agreed to disarm, and Israel has expressed intentions to increase its territorial influence in Gaza to around 70 percent. Military operations continue, resulting in frequent strikes against targets believed to be associated with Hamas. Trump’s peace initiative also envisioned a “Board of Peace,” an international entity tasked with overseeing the execution of the broader peace framework. This board is currently working on establishing a pilot humanitarian zone aimed at revitalizing the stalled plan. Nickolay Mladenov, the board’s envoy for Gaza, praised the Israeli decision, emphasizing its importance in achieving stability, promoting demilitarization, and facilitating the transition to effective Palestinian governance. Meanwhile, recent violence has underscored the ongoing tensions. On Thursday, Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed three individuals, including two children, in the Gaza Strip. Health officials noted casualties in Khan Younis and the Bureij refugee camp, with the Israeli military attributing the attacks to targeting Hamas operatives. The death toll of civilians killed by Israeli forces since the ceasefire began exceeds 1,200. Hamas, however, has not released information regarding its losses. Although the truce has ceased large-scale combat, sporadic Israeli strikes persist, with four Israeli soldiers killed by militants in Gaza over the same period. In Cairo, Hamas representatives engaged in discussions with Egyptian, Qatari, and Turkish mediators concerning the implementation of the second phase of Trump’s Gaza plan. The plan outlines a range of measures, including enhanced humanitarian support, civilian governance, Hamas disarmament, and the deployment of an international security force. While Hamas officials indicated a “positive and good” response, they did not confirm full agreement on key elements, particularly the disarmament of Hamas. The group has expressed a willingness to “confine and store” heavier weaponry under Palestinian oversight rather than transferring it to Israeli authorities. The acceptance of this approach by Israel and the Board of Peace remains uncertain. The situation in Gaza continues to evolve, with both sides navigating complex political and logistical challenges. As the international community watches, the outcome of these negotiations could significantly impact the future of the region.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Irish Times logoThe Irish TimesIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 6523 days ago
Gaza latest: Trump says agreement reached for disarmament of Hamas

US President Donald Trump announced that a disarmament agreement for Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza has been reached through the Board of Peace. The agreement includes Hamas handing over weapons to a new Gaza administration, with Germany pledging support for implementation. However, challenges remain, including the need for Israeli approval, potential delays in implementation spanning up to 350 days, and unresolved disputes over enforcement. The Board of Peace emphasized that the agreement required months of negotiations and stressed the importance of subsequent steps toward rebuilding Gaza and achieving lasting peace.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the disarmament agreement, citing multiple stakeholders (US, Germany, Hamas, Board of Peace) and acknowledging implementation challenges without overtly favoring any side. While the agreement is framed positively, there is no clear ideological slant or one‑

Why factuality (70): This article reports on the announcement of the disarmament agreement and includes quotes from Hamas officials. It does not reference the Yellow Line or Orange Line, thus not aligning with the primary source. The information is based on statements from Hamas and the Board of Peace, which may not ful

Why objectivity (65): The tone is generally positive about the agreement, focusing on the potential benefits for Gazans. It presents the agreement as a positive step without adequately addressing the challenges or criticisms that might accompany such a plan.

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6523 days ago
Hamas says it has reached deal for group's disarmament and Israel's gradual withdrawal from Gaza

In July 2026, Hamas announced an agreement with international mediators, including the US-led Board of Peace, to end the ongoing conflict with Israel. The deal includes Hamas's disarmament and a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. While the agreement outlines a roadmap for implementation, there has been no immediate response from Israel. The plan involves a committee overseeing weapon storage and ensuring compliance with the terms. Despite the ceasefire since October 2025, sporadic violence continues, with recent Israeli airstrikes resulting in civilian casualties. The Board of Peace emphasized the importance of verifying implementation and maintaining security for Gaza's population.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the agreement as a negotiated outcome involving multiple stakeholders, including Hamas, Israel, and international mediators. It avoids overtly praising or criticizing any side, focusing on the procedural aspects of the deal. While the language emphasizes the significance of the

Why factuality (70): Similar to the previous article, this piece focuses on the agreement between Hamas and Israel regarding disarmament and withdrawal. It does not address the Yellow Line or Orange Line, so it does not align with the primary source. The content is based on statements from Hamas officials and the Board

Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a positive tone towards the agreement, emphasizing the steps taken toward peace. It does not critically examine the practical challenges or the broader implications of the agreement, maintaining a one-sided perspective.

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 40Objective 3023 days ago
Hamas has moved toward disarming - now it's up to Israel

The article discusses Donald Trump's 'Board of Peace' initiative aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a 20-point plan focused on Gaza's reconstruction and Palestinian self-determination. While the plan includes proposals like demilitarization of Gaza and economic development, critics argue it lacks credibility due to unrealistic goals and Trump's controversial approach. The piece highlights skepticism towards Trump's vision, noting his history of making grandiose claims and the questionable nature of his AI-generated plans for Gaza. It also addresses recent claims by Trump that Hamas has agreed to complete disarmament, while noting that Hamas officials have not officially confirmed this and emphasize the need for reciprocal Israeli actions before committing to such terms.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of Trump's peace plan, acknowledging both its potential and its flaws. It critiques Trump's approach without overtly endorsing or condemning it, and reports on conflicting perspectives from Hamas officials without taking a clear ideological stance. The framing is

Why factuality (40): This article focuses on Donald Trump's 'Board of Peace' and does not mention the Yellow Line or Orange Line at all. It provides no information about the ceasefire agreement, the demarcation lines, or their impacts on the ground. Therefore, it lacks factual content related to the primary source docum

Why objectivity (30): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'bluster and self-congratulation' and frames Trump's efforts in a highly critical manner. It presents a biased view of Trump's initiatives without providing balanced analysis or context.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories