ON
← Back to feed
Israel accused of targeting journalists in deadly series of strikes
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives16 days ago

Israel accused of targeting journalists in deadly series of strikes

Human rights organizations Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch accuse Israel of committing a war crime by allegedly targeting two Lebanese journalists during airstrikes in southern Lebanon. Amal Khalil, a 42-year-old journalist for Al-Akhbar, and her 21-year-old colleague Zeinab Faraj were injured in a series of three strikes by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on April 22. The IDF claimed the attacks were aimed at Hezbollah fighters, but the journalists were sheltering in a vehicle when the strikes occurred. Surviving footage and testimonies suggest the IDF was aware of the presence of civilians and continued the attacks despite this knowledge. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam condemned the actions as a war crime, while the human rights groups argue the incidents demonstrate a pattern of deliberate targeting of journalists.

Israel faces accusations of deliberately targeting journalists during a series of strikes in southern Lebanon that resulted in the death of Amal Khalil, a 42-year-old correspondent for the Al-Akhbar newspaper, and serious injuries to her 21-year-old colleague, Zeinab Faraj, a freelance photographer and camera operator. The alleged attack took place in the village of Al-Tiri on April 22, according to human rights organizations including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, which have called the incident a potential war crime under international humanitarian law. Khalil and Faraj were traveling near Al-Tiri, close to the town of Bint Jbeil, to investigate claims that Israeli forces had withdrawn from the region amid ongoing hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah. They were accompanied by Ali Nabil Bazzi, the local mayor, and his friend Mohammed Hourani. According to the IDF, both men were identified as Hezbollah operatives. Moments after the group arrived in Al-Tiri, before 2:30 pm, the vehicle carrying Bazzi and Hourani came under attack. This marked the beginning of a sequence of strikes that would ultimately lead to the deaths and injuries of the journalists. Three separate strikes occurred within a span of two hours. The first struck a vehicle ahead of Khalil and Faraj’s car, prompting the journalists to seek shelter. An hour later, a second strike hit their vehicle directly, wounding both women. A third strike followed shortly thereafter. Throughout these incidents, Israeli surveillance drones were observed hovering overhead, drawing concern from the survivors. Faraj described how the drones approached dangerously close, less than a meter from the broken roof of the shelter where she and Khalil had taken refuge. She recounted feeling intense fear, recalling footage she had previously seen of a drone causing fatal damage. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam condemned the attack as a war crime at the time, citing the apparent intent to harm civilians. The findings from the investigations conducted by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch suggest that the Israeli military was aware or should have been aware of the presence of two civilian women seeking shelter in the building. Despite this knowledge, the military allegedly proceeded with further attacks, violating principles of international humanitarian law. According to Amnesty International’s Heba Morayef, the actions of the Israeli military demonstrated a “shocking disregard” for the safety of non-combatants. Human Rights Watch echoed these concerns, stating that the evidence clearly showed the military had targeted journalists, contradicting its previous claims of not doing so. Ramzi Kaiss of Human Rights Watch emphasized that Khalil and Faraj were among many victims of similar attacks, highlighting a pattern of behavior by the IDF. The timeline of events revealed by the investigations indicated that Khalil and Faraj had traveled to Al-Tiri to confirm reports of Israeli troop movements. Their journey coincided with the arrival of Bazzi and Hourani, whose vehicle was initially struck. Following the initial attack, Lebanese civil defense teams attempted to reach the scene but were delayed at a military checkpoint. Officials from the Lebanese military reportedly required approval from the IDF before allowing access to the area, a procedure established under the November 2024 ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah. During this delay, civil defense personnel contacted the journalists, urging them to evacuate immediately due to the risk of further attacks. Faraj’s account of the incident, captured in screenshots of a video call with her sister, shows the journalists' vehicle moving in front of Khalil and Faraj’s car, suggesting they were following the other vehicle. This detail adds to the narrative that the journalists were not engaged in combat activities but were instead fulfilling their journalistic duties in a conflict zone. As the investigation continues, pressure mounts on Israel to address the allegations against its military. The case underscores the broader issue of civilian casualties in conflicts and raises questions about the adherence to international laws governing warfare. The fate of the journalists and the circumstances surrounding their injuries remain central to the unfolding legal and political discourse.

2 reports

SBS News logoSBS NewsState / PublicProgressiveFactual 86Objective 8216 days ago
Rights groups decry Israeli killing of Lebanese journalist as 'war crime'

Israeli airstrikes in southern Lebanon on 22 April resulted in the death of journalist Amal Khalil and injury to another journalist, Zeinab Faraj. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Lebanese rights group The Legal Agenda have all called the attack a potential war crime, citing evidence that Israeli forces knew or should have known the victims were civilians. The Israeli military claimed it targeted a vehicle linked to Hezbollah and denied obstructing rescue efforts. This incident adds to a broader pattern of violence against journalists in Lebanon, with 15 media workers killed by Israeli forces since October 2023.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the incident as a clear violation of international humanitarian law, emphasizing the deaths of civilians and the lack of accountability from Israeli forces. It cites multiple human rights organizations and highlights the systemic issue of impunity for Israeli military actions, a

Why factuality (86): This article corroborates the details from the first article, citing specific dates, names, and organizations involved. It provides additional context about the timing relative to a ceasefire and includes quotes from multiple human rights groups. The information is consistent with the cross-source c

Why objectivity (82): The article remains largely objective, presenting both the accusations from human rights groups and the Israeli military's response. While it uses terms like 'war crime,' it does so based on the findings of credible organizations rather than inserting personal opinion. The tone is more balanced comp

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7817 days ago
Israel accused of targeting journalists in deadly series of strikes

Human rights organizations Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch accuse Israel of committing a war crime by allegedly targeting two Lebanese journalists during airstrikes in southern Lebanon. Amal Khalil, a 42-year-old journalist for Al-Akhbar, and her 21-year-old colleague Zeinab Faraj were injured in a series of three strikes by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on April 22. The IDF claimed the attacks were aimed at Hezbollah fighters, but the journalists were sheltering in a vehicle when the strikes occurred. Surviving footage and testimonies suggest the IDF was aware of the presence of civilians and continued the attacks despite this knowledge. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam condemned the actions as a war crime, while the human rights groups argue the incidents demonstrate a pattern of deliberate targeting of journalists.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a potential war crime committed by Israel, emphasizing the alleged deliberate targeting of journalists and citing statements from left-leaning human rights organizations. It highlights the lack of accountability and the violation of international humanitarian law,傾

Why factuality (85): The article presents detailed accounts from multiple sources including interviews with survivors, emergency crews, and statements from human rights organizations. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the incident involving Amal Khalil and Zeinab Faraj. However, it stops mid-sentence,

Why objectivity (78): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting allegations from human rights organizations without overt bias. However, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'war crime' and describes the journalists' experiences in a way that emphasizes their vulnerability, which may lean towards sympathy

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories