ON
← Back to feed
Iran threatens Gulf states: Not a drop of oil will leave the Strait of Hormuz
Germany🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive17 hr. ago

Iran threatens Gulf states: Not a drop of oil will leave the Strait of Hormuz

The Iranian regime has escalated its threats against Gulf states that support U.S. sanctions against Iran, warning that any cooperation with Washington would result in economic devastation. National Security Council chief Mohsen Rezaei accused these countries of participating in an 'economic war' and warned that oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz would cease entirely. The threat comes amid ongoing military clashes between Iran and the U.S./Israel, where Iran has attacked Gulf monarchies to increase costs for its adversaries. Rezaei also threatened to keep the strategic strait closed until Washington changes its approach. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump intensified sanctions, promising 'hardest sanctions in history,' while U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced new punitive measures. In parallel, the United Arab Emirates suspended trade with Iran and financial transactions, raising concerns about the impact on Iran’s economy. Iranian Central Bank Chief admitted that oil revenues had effectively collapsed.

Gulf states are seeking alternative routes to bypass the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing tensions with Iran, according to reports. The strategic waterway, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, has become a focal point in the region’s geopolitical struggles. With Iranian forces maintaining a tight grip over the strait, oil tankers have been forced to navigate through dangerous waters under cover of darkness, often disabling their transponders to avoid detection. Some vessels receive protection from U.S. military assets, yet threats from Tehran persist, with ships frequently coming under fire. Before the current conflict, approximately 20 million barrels of crude oil per day passed through the strait, about one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas trade. Now, that volume has drastically declined, according to industry sources. The situation shows no immediate signs of resolution. Iran appears prepared for a prolonged standoff with the United States, determined to retain control over the strait and its associated leverage. Officials in Tehran have made clear that they view the strait as an inherent part of their territory, with Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi recently stating, “The Strait of Hormuz belongs to Iran, belonged to Iran, and will belong to Iran.” This stance underscores the deep-seated resistance to any perceived concessions. The pressure on Gulf allies, particularly those dependent on oil exports, remains intense. Even if hostilities in Iran ease, the threat posed by Tehran’s control over the strait could remain a long-term challenge. In response, wealthy Gulf monarchies are investing heavily in infrastructure projects aimed at diversifying energy export routes. These include pipelines and storage facilities in countries such as Japan, South Korea, and India, designed to provide emergency reserves during crises. Experts caution that these efforts come with risks and high costs. According to Bachar El-Halabi, an energy market analyst based in Dubai and affiliated with Argus Media, while the volume of oil transported through the strait may never return to pre-war levels, the route itself cannot be fully replaced. “The effect can only be diluted,” he explained. Economists in the Gulf describe this as a long-term strategic vision requiring years, possibly decades, to achieve. Not all Gulf nations are equally well-positioned to implement such strategies. Analysts highlight that major players like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have better prospects for diversifying their export routes. Riyadh, for instance, is increasingly utilizing an East-West pipeline that transports roughly seven million barrels of oil daily to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Aramco CEO Yassir Rumayyan has referred to this pipeline as a “lifeline” for the kingdom. Saudi authorities are currently working to expand this capacity and are considering constructing a second pipeline dedicated to refined petroleum products. However, the reach of Iranian-backed groups extends beyond the Strait of Hormuz. Supported by Tehran, the Houthi rebels in Yemen pose a direct threat to Saudi shipping interests in the Red Sea. Their attacks using drones and missiles target both oil tankers and critical maritime chokepoints such as the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which links the Indian Ocean to the Red Sea. The Houthi have already attacked oil infrastructure in Yanbu, including the East-West pipeline, highlighting vulnerabilities even in supposedly secure routes. As Gulf states continue to seek alternatives to the Strait of Hormuz, the broader implications for regional stability and global energy markets remain uncertain. The shift toward diversified infrastructure represents a significant adaptation strategy, though its effectiveness will depend on overcoming both logistical challenges and persistent security threats. Meanwhile, the continued presence of Iranian forces in key maritime corridors ensures that the issue remains central to the region's geopolitical landscape.

2 reports

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Iran War: How the Gulf Countries Want to Bypass the Strait of Hormuz

The article discusses the ongoing challenges faced by oil tankers navigating through the Strait of Hormuz due to Iranian military threats. It highlights the significant reduction in oil exports through this critical waterway since the start of the Iran war, with only a fraction of pre-war volumes now passing through. The piece emphasizes the strategic importance of the strait and Iran's refusal to relinquish control over it, as stated by Iranian officials. Gulf states are investing heavily in alternative routes and infrastructure to mitigate the risks, including pipelines and storage facilities in countries like Japan, South Korea, and India. Experts note these efforts are costly and uncertain, with the impact of the Hormuz route being difficult to replace.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents the Iranian stance and the challenges faced by Gulf states, it does not overtly favor one side over another. It provides balanced information about both the Iranian position and the responses from Gulf nations, without clear ideological leaning in its framing or emphasis.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the ongoing situation regarding oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz during the Iran-Iraq war, citing figures like 20 million barrels per day before the war. It references branch services indicating a significant drop in traffic post-war and quotes Iranian officials such

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a generally neutral tone but frames the situation from the perspective of Western allies and the U.S., emphasizing the threat posed by Iran. There is some editorializing in phrases like 'der Hormus-Effekt lässt sich nur verwässern' which suggests a particular viewpoint on the i

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒Progressive17 hr. ago
Iran threatens Gulf states: Not a drop of oil will leave the Strait of Hormuz

The Iranian regime has escalated its threats against Gulf states that support U.S. sanctions against Iran, warning that any cooperation with Washington would result in economic devastation. National Security Council chief Mohsen Rezaei accused these countries of participating in an 'economic war' and warned that oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz would cease entirely. The threat comes amid ongoing military clashes between Iran and the U.S./Israel, where Iran has attacked Gulf monarchies to increase costs for its adversaries. Rezaei also threatened to keep the strategic strait closed until Washington changes its approach. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump intensified sanctions, promising 'hardest sanctions in history,' while U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced new punitive measures. In parallel, the United Arab Emirates suspended trade with Iran and financial transactions, raising concerns about the impact on Iran’s economy. Iranian Central Bank Chief admitted that oil revenues had effectively collapsed.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Iranian stance as a defensive position against Western economic aggression, emphasizing the geopolitical stakes and the potential collapse of Iran's economy due to sanctions. It highlights the severity of U.S. actions and the perceived threat to regional stability, which align

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories