ON
← Back to feed
Iran war day 121: Iran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait as US strikes near Hormuz
World🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 days ago

Iran war day 121: Iran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait as US strikes near Hormuz

On the 121st day of the ongoing conflict between the US and Iran, the US conducted airstrikes on several locations in Iran, including Sirik, Bandar-e Lengeh, and Qeshm Island, in response to a drone attack on a commercial vessel near the Strait of Hormuz. In retaliation, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have attacked US military bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. The attacks prompted air raid sirens in Bahrain and activated air defenses in Kuwait, increasing regional tensions. Meanwhile, Israel continued its military operations in southern Lebanon, killing at least one person, despite recently reaching a framework agreement with the Lebanese government to end the fighting. Analysts warn that the cycle of retaliatory strikes risks further escalation, with concerns over potential violations of the War Powers Resolution and rising oil prices influencing US policy.

On June 28, 2026, the escalating conflict between Iran and the United States entered its 121st day, marked by intensified military exchanges and rising regional tensions. In a coordinated series of actions, Iran launched ballistic missiles and drones targeting U.S. military installations in Kuwait and Bahrain, specifically the Ali Al Salem Air Base and the U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters. These strikes came in direct response to U.S. airstrikes conducted over two consecutive days, which targeted several coastal areas in Iran, including Sirik, Bandar-e Lengeh, and Qeshm Island. The U.S. strikes followed a reported drone attack on a commercial vessel near the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint for global oil trade.

Across the Gulf, the effects of these military maneuvers were immediately felt. In Bahrain, air raid sirens were activated, prompting residents to seek shelter in designated safe zones. Meanwhile, Kuwait's air defense systems were engaged in response to perceived hostile missile and drone threats. Despite the heightened activity, a U.S. official confirmed that no American casualties had been reported and that there was no indication of significant damage to infrastructure. However, the incident underscored the growing volatility in the region, where both sides appear determined to assert their strategic positions.

Tehran-based political analyst Abas Aslani emphasized that Iran perceives the Strait of Hormuz as a crucial lever to deter further U.S. aggression. According to Aslani, any attempt to alter the status quo in the strait through force is deemed unacceptable by the Iranian leadership. This sentiment aligns with the statements made by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which claimed responsibility for the attacks on U.S. bases in Kuwait and Bahrain, framing them as retaliatory measures against the recent U.S. strikes.

Regional responses to the developments were swift and unified. Oman joined neighboring Gulf states in condemning the Iranian drone attack on Bahrain, expressing full solidarity with the kingdom and opposing any actions that jeopardize regional stability. Similarly, Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates all voiced their disapproval of the attack, highlighting the broader concern among Gulf nations regarding the potential for further escalation.

In Washington, D.C., the White House signaled a more resolute stance toward Iran. Reports indicated that President Donald Trump warned that the U.S. might be compelled to "complete the job" if Iran continued its attacks, raising fears of further militarization of the conflict. Retired U.S. naval officer Harlan Ullman cautioned that the ongoing cycle of retaliation between the U.S. and Iran risks spiraling into uncontrolled escalation. He noted that the resulting surge in oil prices could influence Trump's decision-making process, potentially pushing him back toward diplomatic negotiations.

Domestically, criticism of the U.S. military actions emerged from within Congress. Democratic Representative Ro Khanna accused the administration of violating the War Powers Resolution, asserting that the renewed attacks on Iran constituted a clear breach of legislative constraints. He warned that if Trump did not halt the conflict, legal action could be pursued against him.

Meanwhile, in Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed a newly signed U.S.-brokered framework agreement with Lebanon as a historic achievement, describing it as a significant setback for Iran and Hezbollah. The agreement aimed to bring an end to hostilities in southern Lebanon while allowing Israel to maintain a security buffer until Hezbollah is disarmed. However, Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir criticized the deal, arguing that it inadvertently provides Hezbollah with a lifeline and advocating instead for a more aggressive approach against the group.

Lebanon’s president, Joseph Aoun, expressed hope that the U.S. would ensure compliance with the agreement and facilitate the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon. President Donald Trump reportedly extended his congratulations to Aoun following the signing ceremony, pledging U.S. support for Lebanon’s economic and military capabilities.

As the conflict continues to unfold, the international community remains closely watchful, with many observers anticipating further developments that could either de-escalate the situation or push it toward even greater instability. The interplay of military actions, geopolitical maneuvering, and internal political dynamics suggests that the coming days will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of the crisis.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 858 days ago
Iran war day 121: Iran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait as US strikes near Hormuz

On the 121st day of the ongoing conflict between the US and Iran, the US conducted airstrikes on several locations in Iran, including Sirik, Bandar-e Lengeh, and Qeshm Island, in response to a drone attack on a commercial vessel near the Strait of Hormuz. In retaliation, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have attacked US military bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. The attacks prompted air raid sirens in Bahrain and activated air defenses in Kuwait, increasing regional tensions. Meanwhile, Israel continued its military operations in southern Lebanon, killing at least one person, despite recently reaching a framework agreement with the Lebanese government to end the fighting. Analysts warn that the cycle of retaliatory strikes risks further escalation, with concerns over potential violations of the War Powers Resolution and rising oil prices influencing US policy.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the escalating conflict between the US and Iran, including statements from both sides, reactions from regional allies, and expert opinions warning of potential escalation. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of key context.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Factual accuracy is high, reporting US strikes on Iranian targets and Iranian responses. Cross-source consensus supports these events. Objectivity is slightly lower due to some emotionally charged language like 'heightened tensions' and emphasis on Iranian perspective.

Handelsblatt logoHandelsblattIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 659 days ago
Iran war: British military reports attack on tankers in Strait of Hormuz

The British military has reported an attack on a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil trade. The incident occurred amid heightened tensions between Iran and Western countries, particularly following recent escalations in the region. The Strait of Hormuz is a strategic chokepoint through which a significant portion of the world's oil passes, making such attacks potentially impactful on global energy markets. The attack raises concerns about regional security and could further complicate ongoing diplomatic efforts to de-escalate hostilities. The British military's confirmation of the attack underscores the growing risks of conflict in the area.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a military incident in a geopolitically sensitive region without overtly favoring any side. It presents the event as confirmed by the British military but does not provide additional context or commentary that would indicate a clear ideological slant.

Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): Factuality is lower due to incomplete information and lack of specific details. The article appears to reference an ongoing conflict but lacks clarity on exact events. Objectivity is compromised by vague phrasing and potential bias in framing the narrative.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories