Iran: Trump would violate international law with 'economic war'

Iran has accused the United States of violating international law through its planned “economic war” against Tehran, calling the measures a return to colonialism. The claim was made by Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, who stated that the U.S. plan to impose economic sanctions on countries supporting Iran violates the principles of sovereignty and international legal norms. The accusation comes amid heightened tensions between the two nations, with President Donald Trump threatening severe penalties against states that continue to support Iran. Washington has been intensifying economic pressure on Tehran, which has led to increased diplomatic friction. According to Baghaei, the economic coercion aimed at forcing sovereign states to abandon lawful trade relations with Iran constitutes a direct violation of international law. Baghaei emphasized that such actions represent a breach of the United Nations Charter, particularly highlighting the so-called “secondary sanctions” as a clear infringement of global legal standards. He warned that these measures, combined with the American naval blockade of Iranian ports, risk bringing back the full-scale return of classical colonialism. The remarks were delivered during a statement on the social media platform X, underscoring the gravity of the situation. The U.S. stance, under Trump's administration, has focused on isolating Iran economically and politically. This strategy includes targeting not only Iran directly but also allies and partners of the Islamic Republic, aiming to cut off financial and logistical support. The policy has drawn sharp criticism from Iran, which argues that such actions undermine the principles of non-interference and mutual respect among nations. International observers have noted that the dispute reflects broader geopolitical shifts, with the U.S. seeking to assert dominance in the region while Iran resists external pressures. The conflict has implications beyond bilateral relations, affecting regional stability and the balance of power in the Middle East. The use of economic tools as instruments of political leverage has become increasingly common, yet it raises concerns about the erosion of state sovereignty and the rule of law. As the standoff continues, both sides remain entrenched in their positions. Iran insists that its policies are lawful and justified within the framework of international law, while the U.S. maintains that its actions are necessary to counter perceived threats to national security and regional stability. The situation remains volatile, with potential for further escalation unless diplomatic channels can be reopened to address the underlying issues. The outcome will likely depend on how both parties navigate the complex interplay of economic, political, and legal considerations.