Iran says no progress on reviving interim peace deal with US

Iran has confirmed that no progress has been made in reviving the interim peace deal with the United States aimed at ending hostilities in the Gulf, according to a senior Iranian official. The statement comes amid renewed tensions in the region and continued diplomatic stalemate between the two nations. The official emphasized that discussions mediated by third parties have failed to produce any meaningful movement toward restoring the agreement reached in June, which sought to halt military operations on all fronts. Efforts to revive the deal began after its collapse earlier this year. The original agreement, signed in June, called for an immediate and permanent cessation of military actions by both sides. However, the deal unraveled shortly after its announcement. On 7 July, U.S. President Donald Trump declared the agreement "over," while Iran’s foreign ministry stated a week later that it had been "suspended." Since then, attempts to negotiate a resolution have stalled, with neither side showing willingness to compromise. Recent developments have further complicated the situation. On Tuesday, new attacks were reported in the region, prompting additional criticism from Trump against Iranian leadership. These incidents have added pressure on both countries to find a solution, but they have instead deepened the divide. The Iranian source noted that one of the key points under discussion through intermediaries involves the U.S. returning to the interim agreement and establishing a clear timeline for fulfilling each party’s commitments. Despite these ongoing talks, the source stressed that no tangible results have emerged. The breakdown of the initial deal highlights the fragile nature of U.S.-Iran relations, which have long been marked by mutual distrust and conflicting interests. The interim agreement represented a rare moment of cooperation, but its swift dissolution underscores the difficulty of reaching lasting agreements between the two nations. Analysts suggest that the lack of progress stems from fundamental disagreements over the terms of engagement, particularly regarding Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence. Both Iran and the United States have accused each other of undermining the peace process. Iran has repeatedly criticized the U.S. for its policies in the Middle East, including support for Israel and military presence in the region. Conversely, the U.S. has blamed Iran for escalating tensions through proxy conflicts and missile tests. These accusations have created a cycle of retaliation and counter-retaliation, making it increasingly difficult to establish a stable framework for dialogue. Despite the current impasse, some diplomatic channels remain open. Mediators have attempted to facilitate negotiations, but their efforts have so far yielded little. The absence of progress raises concerns about the future of any potential peace initiatives. With both sides appearing entrenched in their positions, the possibility of a breakthrough seems remote unless external pressures or internal changes prompt a shift in strategy. The situation remains fluid, with the potential for further escalation or unexpected developments. Both Iran and the United States continue to monitor each other’s actions closely, aware that even minor provocations could lead to renewed conflict. As the international community watches, the hope for a resolution hinges on whether either side will take steps to de-escalate tensions and return to the negotiating table.