ON
← Back to feed
Iran to allow Iraqi tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Iran to allow Iraqi tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz

The article discusses the situation regarding Iranian facilitation of Iraqi oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz. It cites Iraqi President Masoud Barzani stating that Iraq has suffered significant financial losses due to the closure of the strait to oil exports. The article mentions that Iraq has repeatedly requested access, including during a visit by Barzani this week. Iranian state media reports that Tehran has allowed more Iraqi tankers to pass through the strait despite U.S. military measures and tensions. However, the number of tankers and whether this permission is permanent remain unclear. The article also notes U.S. allegations that Tehran exploits cooperation with Iraq to evade sanctions by mixing crude oil and selling it under Iraqi flags. Additionally, it mentions that China, India, and Pakistan have also sought special permits for passage. The U.S. maintains control over the strait, which was a major route for global oil and gas exports before the war in the Middle East began on February 28. President Trump refers to the strait as 'American territory.'

Iran has reportedly granted permission to several Iraqi oil tankers to pass through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, according to reports citing Iranian state media and officials. The move comes amid ongoing tensions in the region following the outbreak of conflict in early March, which has left the strait under Iranian control. According to the Iranian news agency Irna, Tehran has allowed more than one Iraqi tanker to transit through the strait over the past six months, despite stringent military measures and uncertainty caused by actions attributed to the United States. However, the exact number of vessels that have successfully crossed remains unclear, as does whether this special authorization applies permanently to all ships from Iraq. The issue arose after Iraqi President Barham Salih reportedly informed Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf during his recent visit to Baghdad that Iraq has suffered severe financial losses due to the closure of the strait for its oil exports. Salih stated that the Iraqi government would be unable to pay salaries to public sector employees while the strait remains closed. This prompted discussions between the two countries regarding potential access for Iraqi tankers, with requests made multiple times, including during Qalibaf’s visit earlier this week. The Strait of Hormuz, connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, is a critical global shipping route, accounting for nearly 20 percent of the world's seaborne oil trade before the conflict erupted. While Iran maintains control over the strait, it requires all vessels passing through to obtain prior approval and pay transit fees. Despite this, the U.S. continues to assert its claim over the waterway, with President Donald Trump describing it as “American territory” and insisting Washington has “full control” over it. Iraq and Iran share a long history of close political, religious, and economic ties, including a 1,600-kilometer border. Their cooperation extends beyond regional diplomacy, with reports suggesting that Iran has used its relationship with Iraq to circumvent international sanctions. According to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Iran allegedly mixes its crude oil or fuel with Iraqi oil, marking it as Iraqi using forged documents to sell it on the global market. These allegations highlight the complex interplay between regional alliances and international sanctions enforcement. In addition to Iraq, other nations such as China, India, and Pakistan are believed to have engaged with Iran to secure special permissions for their vessels to transit through the strait. These negotiations reflect the broader geopolitical stakes surrounding the waterway, which remains a focal point of tension between Iran and Western powers, particularly the United States. The situation underscores the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, not only for the flow of energy resources but also for the balance of power in the Middle East. As the conflict continues, the ability of non-Iranian vessels to navigate the strait will likely remain a contentious issue, with implications for global energy markets and regional stability. The extent to which Iran will continue to grant access to foreign tankers, and under what conditions, remains uncertain.

2 reports

Delo logoDeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 78Objective 68yesterday
Iran has reportedly already allowed Iraqi tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran has reportedly granted special permission to several Iraqi oil tankers to pass through the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, which remains otherwise closed. The move came during visits by Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf to Baghdad, where he met with Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi. Iraqi President Barham Salih stated that Iraq has suffered significant financial losses due to the closure of the strait and that the government cannot pay salaries to civil servants while the strait remains blocked for Iraqi oil exports. According to reports, Iran has allowed passage for some Iraqi tankers despite strict military measures and uncertainty in the strait caused by U.S. actions. However, it is unclear how many tankers have actually passed through or whether this allowance is permanent for all Iraqi vessels. Additionally, the U.S. claims to have full control over the strait, which handles a fifth of global oil and gas exports, and views it as American territory.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives and does not exhibit clear bias toward either Iran or the United States. It includes statements from both Iranian and Iraqi officials, as well as references to U.S. claims regarding the Strait of Hormuz. The language used is neutral, and there is no evident

Why factuality (78): This article corroborates the previous report, stating that Iran may have allowed more Iraqi tankers through the strait, citing similar sources including IRNA and AFP. It includes quotes from Iraqi leaders and mentions ongoing negotiations with foreign countries. The information aligns closely with

Why objectivity (68): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the situation from multiple angles including Iranian, Iraqi, and U.S. perspectives. However, there is a subtle emphasis on the significance of Iran's actions, which might suggest a slight bias toward highlighting diplomatic efforts rather t

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 65yesterday
Iran to allow Iraqi tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz

The article discusses the situation regarding Iranian facilitation of Iraqi oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz. It cites Iraqi President Masoud Barzani stating that Iraq has suffered significant financial losses due to the closure of the strait to oil exports. The article mentions that Iraq has repeatedly requested access, including during a visit by Barzani this week. Iranian state media reports that Tehran has allowed more Iraqi tankers to pass through the strait despite U.S. military measures and tensions. However, the number of tankers and whether this permission is permanent remain unclear. The article also notes U.S. allegations that Tehran exploits cooperation with Iraq to evade sanctions by mixing crude oil and selling it under Iraqi flags. Additionally, it mentions that China, India, and Pakistan have also sought special permits for passage. The U.S. maintains control over the strait, which was a major route for global oil and gas exports before the war in the Middle East began on February 28. President Trump refers to the strait as 'American territory.'

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes statements from both Iraqi and Iranian officials, references to U.S. accusations, and mentions the geopolitical implications without taking a clear ideological stance. While there is some focus

Why factuality (75): The article reports on Iranian facilitation of Iraqi tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, citing statements from Iraqi President Nasir Al-Ammiri and Iranian state media IRNA. It mentions negotiations with China, India, and Pakistan, and references U.S. sanctions and military actions. While these po

Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards portraying Iran as facilitating access despite U.S. tensions, while also mentioning U.S. perspectives. The article presents both sides but has a slight pro-Iranian tilt in emphasizing the facilitation of Iraqi tankers, though not overtly biased.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories