Israeli military units have detailed the intricate process of dismantling extensive tunnel networks constructed by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, revealing the complexity and danger involved in neutralizing these subterranean structures. According to Lt. Col. D, commander of the IDF’s S-2 special engineering platoon, the operation has evolved significantly since October 7, 2023, shifting focus from explosive disposal in the Gaza Strip to identifying, mapping, and destroying critical tunnels in southern Lebanon. These tunnels, described as “crazy” and “Iranian,” represent a major threat to Israeli security and have required specialized techniques to dismantle. Lt. Col. D recounted the discovery of a particularly large tunnel in the town of Majdal Zoun, southern Lebanon, which measured three meters in height and three and a half meters in width. This tunnel, unlike others previously encountered, offered a level of comfort and accessibility that raised concerns among the IDF. The entry point was not accessed through its original door, which could have been booby-trapped or damaged by prior air strikes. Instead, soldiers had to navigate through debris left by an Israeli Air Force strike conducted more than a year earlier, including steel fragments scattered across the tunnel floor. Once inside, the soldiers faced the challenge of removing multiple blast doors, each weighing between five to seven tons. Specialized engineering equipment was used to strip these doors away, allowing access deeper into the tunnel system. Despite the technical challenges, the operation was marked by moments of triumph, such as the successful identification of the Majdal Zoun tunnel, which led to a collective expression of relief and celebration among the soldiers involved. The operation extends beyond the physical destruction of tunnels. Soldiers must contend with hazardous environments within the tunnels, including remnants of human waste, spoiled food, and expired supplies. Such conditions pose serious health risks, necessitating protective gear such as face masks and white suits to prevent exposure to harmful substances. Additionally, an operational safety net has been established above ground, with a dedicated rescue team from the Yahalom unit prepared to extract soldiers in case of emergencies. The efforts to dismantle Hezbollah’s infrastructure in Lebanon are part of a broader strategy involving international cooperation. Recent developments indicate that the United States, Israel, and Lebanon are working together in designated areas of southern Lebanon, aiming to stabilize the region and reduce tensions. This collaboration includes the deployment of the Lebanese Army, which has shown increasing engagement in countering Hezbollah activities. Retired military officer Lt.-Col. Or Horowitz noted a significant decline in Hezbollah’s strength, attributing it to internal weaknesses and external pressures, including the growing influence of the Lebanese Army supported by U.S. involvement. Horowitz emphasized that Iran’s reluctance to engage directly with Israel might stem from fears of Hezbollah’s potential collapse should hostilities resume. He suggested that Iran recognizes the precarious position of Hezbollah, which has suffered substantial losses and is increasingly isolated. This perception influences Iran’s strategic decisions regarding its involvement in regional conflicts, highlighting the delicate balance of power dynamics in the area. As the situation unfolds, the IDF continues to refine its tactics for dealing with underground threats, integrating advanced technology and international support to ensure operational effectiveness. The ongoing operations reflect a multifaceted approach to securing Israel’s borders and addressing the evolving nature of asymmetric warfare in the region.
2 reports
The Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 70Objective 609 days ago Iran avoiding strikes on Israel over fear of Hezbollah's collapse, former intelligence officer saysA former Israeli military intelligence officer, retired Lt.-Col. Or Horowitz, claims that Iran is avoiding attacks on Israel due to concerns about Hezbollah's potential collapse in Lebanon. Horowitz argues that Hezbollah, a powerful Iranian-backed militia, has significantly weakened and is no longer capable of posing a serious threat to Israel. He notes that the Lebanese Army is becoming more active against Hezbollah, supported by U.S. involvement through tripartite agreements with Israel and Lebanon. Horowitz suggests that this shift could lead to a major transformation in Lebanon's political landscape, potentially reducing regional tensions.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the perspective of a former Israeli military intelligence officer who asserts that Hezbollah is 'a pale shadow' of its former self and that Iran is avoiding conflict with Israel due to fears of Hezbollah's collapse. This framing emphasizes the decline of an Iranian-backed group,
Why factuality (70): The article discusses a former intelligence officer's analysis regarding Iran's hesitation to strike Israel due to Hezbollah's weakness. It references U.S. State Department announcements about activities in Lebanon, adding some credibility. However, it does not provide independent verification of th
Why objectivity (60): The article has a more subjective tone, with the former officer expressing personal views and interpretations. Phrases like 'historic change' and 'very brave moves' suggest a certain perspective that may not be universally accepted. This introduces a subtle bias in favor of the argument that Hezboll
i24NEWSIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 7012 days ago Lebanon: Israeli Forces Surround Hezbollah Fighters In Tunnel NetworkIsraeli forces have surrounded a network of tunnels where Hezbollah fighters are reportedly located, according to a report by i24NEWS. The situation highlights ongoing tensions between Israel and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The article describes the military buildup along the border, suggesting heightened security measures in response to potential threats. No specific details about casualties, operations, or international reactions are provided.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of Israeli military activity without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. It focuses on the event itself rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject matter is politically charged due to the involvement of Israel and Hezbollah, the帧
Why factuality (65): The article reports that Israeli forces have surrounded Hezbollah fighters in a tunnel network, but due to the lack of a primary source document, factuality cannot be independently verified. The claim aligns with cross-source consensus from other media outlets covering the same event, suggesting it
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, focusing on the reported actions of both sides without overt bias. It uses standard journalistic phrasing and does not include emotionally charged language or take a clear stance on the conflict, maintaining a relatively objective perspective.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter