ON
← Back to feed
elDiario.es logo🏛️ Politics
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 days ago

Investigated for recording with a 'spy' pen the spokesperson of Vox in the Cantabrian Parliament

The head of the Instruction Court number 2 in Santander has ordered an investigation into Leticia Díaz, the spokesperson for Vox in the Cantabrian Parliament, over her possible involvement in the discovery of a recording pen found in the office of Vox’s parliamentary group. The probe was initiated based on a 2024 complaint by two Vox MPs, Armando Blanco and Cristóbal Palacio, and two advisors, who found the device on the desk used by Díaz’s advisor. According to court documents released this week, the pen contained 25 audio files, three of which suggest that Díaz was aware of the pen’s existence, understood its purpose, and intended to use it to obtain ‘great things.’ The judge noted that these recordings occurred amid political tensions within the Vox parliamentary group, particularly between Díaz and the other two MPs who filed the complaint. The judge concluded that the content of the recordings, their context, and the fact that the investigated advisor worked almost exclusively for Díaz at the time constitute evidence suggesting her potential involvement in the incident.

A Spanish judge has ordered an investigation into Leticia Díaz, the spokesperson for the Vox party in the Cantabrian Parliament, over her possible involvement in the discovery of a recording pen found in the group's office. The case was initiated following a complaint filed in 2024 by two Vox lawmakers, Armando Blanco and Cristóbal Palacio, and two advisors. The complaint came after the device was discovered on a desk used by the advisors and the spokesperson’s work area. The judge overseeing the case, from the Second Instruction Court of the Santander District Court, issued an order this week detailing the findings. According to the ruling, the recording pen contained 25 audio files. Three of these recordings clearly show a woman who has been identified by three individuals as Díaz discussing the device. She is heard saying she knew about its existence, understood how it worked, and intended to use it to obtain "great things." The judge noted that the content of the recordings must be considered within the context of political tensions within the Vox parliamentary group. These tensions primarily pitted Díaz against the two lawmakers who filed the complaint. This rivalry extended to the advisors as well. In their complaint, the lawmakers and advisors stated they suspected the other advisor under investigation had been using the pen to secretly record conversations among colleagues, with the aim of harming them due to existing political rivalries within the group. At the time of the incident, the Vox parliamentary group consisted of four members, including Natividad Pérez, who remains part of the group alongside Blanco and Díaz. The judge concluded that the content of the recordings, the circumstances surrounding their creation, and the fact that the investigated advisor was working almost exclusively for Díaz at the time, constitute evidence suggesting her potential involvement in the incident. As a result, the judge decided to investigate Díaz and take her statement as a suspect. The analysis of the recording pen revealed that it stored 25 audio files capturing various conversations. In three of these, both the investigated advisor and Díaz are identifiable as participants, and both refer explicitly to the device. In one conversation, Díaz says, "It looks nice," and adds, "Let's see if it captures anything." The man responds that he first needs to read the instructions. Later, she asks, "Are we going to get great things out of this?" In another exchange, the man asks, "Have you turned it on?" Díaz replies, "I just turned it on, I just saw the red light," before the man notes, "Now it's stopped." Finally, in the third recording, the man demonstrates how the recorder works. He says, "It's ready, it's recording," and Díaz responds, "Okay." The man continues, "Okay? To stop... press here again and up... it's recording." The judge believes that Díaz had knowledge of the device and its purpose, given the nature of the conversations and the context in which they occurred. The investigation will proceed to determine whether she played a role in the events leading to the discovery of the recording pen.

1 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 785 days ago
Investigated for recording with a 'spy' pen the spokesperson of Vox in the Cantabrian Parliament

The head of the Instruction Court number 2 in Santander has ordered an investigation into Leticia Díaz, the spokesperson for Vox in the Cantabrian Parliament, over her possible involvement in the discovery of a recording pen found in the office of Vox’s parliamentary group. The probe was initiated based on a 2024 complaint by two Vox MPs, Armando Blanco and Cristóbal Palacio, and two advisors, who found the device on the desk used by Díaz’s advisor. According to court documents released this week, the pen contained 25 audio files, three of which suggest that Díaz was aware of the pen’s existence, understood its purpose, and intended to use it to obtain ‘great things.’ The judge noted that these recordings occurred amid political tensions within the Vox parliamentary group, particularly between Díaz and the other two MPs who filed the complaint. The judge concluded that the content of the recordings, their context, and the fact that the investigated advisor worked almost exclusively for Díaz at the time constitute evidence suggesting her potential involvement in the incident.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal investigation involving a political figure, without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from judicial documents and explains the context of political rivalry within the Vox parliamentary group. There is no evident bias in the framing

Why factuality (85): The article reports on an investigation into Leticia Díaz, a Vox spokesperson, based on a cross-source consensus. It cites the legal process initiated by two Vox deputies and advisors who discovered a recording pen in their office. The article accurately describes the content of the recordings and t

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner but uses emotionally charged language such as 'rivalidad política' and 'pretendía obtener con él 'grandes cosas'', which may imply judgment. While it avoids overt bias, the phrasing suggests a certain perspective on the political conflict.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories