The National Institute of Sports has denied authorization for the concerts of the South Korean group BTS scheduled for October 14, 16, and 17, 2026, at the National Stadium. This decision was made following a thorough technical and operational evaluation, according to a public statement released by the institute. The concerts were among the most anticipated events of the year, having been announced well in advance and already sold out months ago. The group, considered one of the most iconic in K-pop, had recently regained prominence after its members completed their mandatory military service in their home country.
According to the official communication from the National Institute of Sports, the decision stems exclusively from technical criteria and continuity concerns related to the current condition of the playing field and the potential impact of setting up a central stage configuration of 360 degrees. Such a setup represents the highest level of demand for a hybrid natural grass surface like that of the Coliseo Central. Specialized reports prepared for this assessment concluded that while the field maintains the necessary conditions for professional football matches and international competitions, it currently exhibits reduced recovery capacity under large-scale interventions, particularly those requiring prolonged coverage of the surface and concentrated loads on the central area of the field.
Additionally, the institute emphasized the need to protect the venue due to prior sports commitments and institutional obligations, such as official matches and the upcoming Telethon 2026. They noted that any potential damage to the field's recovery time could jeopardize the fulfillment of these events, as well as the international certification required for some of them. This situation would be incompatible with the institution’s responsibility to ensure the continuous operation of the country's main sports facility.
Despite this, the National Institute of Sports clarified that they do not aim to reject the organization of mass events. As an alternative, they proposed to the production team the possibility of holding the concert in the southern plaza or southern park areas of the National Stadium. The institute reiterated that this decision does not constitute a rejection of mass events or the use of the venue for major cultural gatherings, which align with the multi-purpose nature of the Park and its connection with the community. In this context, and as a demonstration of their ongoing willingness to collaborate with the entertainment industry and the organization of international events in Chile, the National Stadium Park offered the southern plaza or southern park sectors to the production team to evaluate alternative venues that would allow the event to proceed without affecting the integrity of the Coliseo Central or previously acquired sporting commitments.
The organizers, DG Medios, have yet to comment on the new location that would host the event or on the measures they will take regarding this change. A resolution is expected within the coming hours.
Fans of BTS have taken to social media to express their disappointment and frustration over the decision, directing criticism primarily towards the Minister of Sports, Natalia Duco, who they hold responsible for the choice. Demonstrations have been organized simultaneously in 11 cities across Chile this Sunday, showing strong support for the band and opposition to the decision to relocate the concerts.
The denial of permission for the concerts at the National Stadium highlights the complex balance between hosting high-profile international events and maintaining the structural integrity and functionality of premier sports facilities. It also underscores the growing influence of K-pop groups like BTS in Latin America and the significant economic and cultural impact such events can have when properly managed and supported by local authorities.
With the situation still evolving, all parties remain engaged in discussions aimed at finding a viable solution that meets both the demands of the event organizers and the requirements set forth by the National Institute of Sports. The outcome of these negotiations will likely determine whether the concerts proceed as planned, albeit possibly in an alternate location, or face further delays and complications.
3 reports
La TerceraIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 654 days agoThe National Institute of Sports (IND) in Chile has decided not to authorize the use of the National Stadium for three upcoming BTS concerts scheduled for October 14, 16, and 17, 2026. The decision was based on technical and operational evaluations indicating that the stadium’s hybrid grass surface would struggle to withstand the demands of a large-scale stage setup, particularly a 360-degree configuration. While the stadium remains suitable for professional football matches and international competitions, the IND stated that the event could compromise the field's recovery time and affect future commitments such as official matches and the Teletón 2026. As an alternative, the IND proposed hosting the concerts at the southern area or park of the National Stadium. Fans have expressed disappointment online, with some blaming the sports minister, Natalia Duco.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a cultural event denial due to technical constraints, with no evident political framing or bias. It presents the official reasoning from the National Institute of Sports and mentions fan reactions without taking sides.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides detailed information from the IND's statement, aligning with cross-source consensus. It accurately reports the decision and reasons given. However, it frames the issue as a dispute between fans and the ministry, suggesting bias toward the fans' perspective.
BioBioChileIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 604 days agoThe concert by the South Korean boy band BTS scheduled at the National Stadium in Chile has been called into question after the Internal Revenue Service (IND) did not authorize the event. This development raises concerns about whether the concert will proceed as planned. The lack of authorization from IND suggests potential regulatory or financial hurdles that need to be addressed before the event can take place. The situation highlights the importance of obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for large-scale events.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the status of the BTS concert authorization without apparent bias. It does not favor any particular side or include subjective language, focusing solely on the information provided regarding the IND's decision.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): This article confirms the IND's denial of authorization but lacks specific details from the official statement. It uses a provocative headline that may imply controversy, though it remains largely factual. Objectivity is lower due to potential sensationalism.
BioBioChileIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 55yesterday "BTS to the National": Fans call for simultaneous marches in 11 cities in Chile this SundayThe article reports that fans of the South Korean boy band BTS have organized simultaneous marches in 11 cities across Chile this Sunday, under the slogan 'BTS al Nacional.' The event appears to be a fan-driven demonstration expressing support for the group, which has gained significant popularity in Chile. While the article does not provide specific details about the organizers, the purpose, or the expected impact of the marches, it highlights the growing cultural influence of BTS in the country. The focus is on the grassroots nature of the event, emphasizing fan participation rather than any political or social activism.
Bias read (Center): The subject of the article is a fan-led event related to a music group, which falls under the category of sports or entertainment. As such, it is considered apolitical, and therefore the lean is set to CENTER. There is no indication of political controversy or ideological framing in the content.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): The article focuses on fan reactions and protests rather than the technical reasons behind the IND's decision. It lacks depth on the factual basis of the refusal and shows clear bias toward the fans' cause, reducing objectivity.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
CL
