ON
← Back to feed
Inside the new Afghanistan
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative9/3/2026

Inside the new Afghanistan

The article describes the current situation in Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover, focusing on the changes in Kabul and the broader nation. The author visits Kabul International Airport, noting the division between men and women based on traditional dress. The piece reflects on the chaotic U.S. evacuation in August 2021, marking the end of the American-led presence in the country. It highlights the collapse of the Western-style government established in 2001 and the subsequent rise of the Taliban, which now governs under the banner of the Islamic Emirate. While the author notes improved security and a sense of stability, they also emphasize the loss of personal freedoms and the repressive nature of the new regime. The narrative continues with a journey to Kandahar, the spiritual and political heart of the Taliban, describing the arid landscape and the distant presence of the Taliban leadership.

Kabul's arrivals terminal at Kabul International Airport is divided by gender, with a sea of waiting turbans to the left and veiled figures to the right. The airport, once a symbol of Western influence, now stands as a testament to the Taliban's takeover. Five years ago, on 15 August 2021, the Taliban captured the airport, marking the beginning of their dominance over the country. This led to chaos, culminating in an 18-day operation in which over 123,000 people were evacuated by air, the largest non-combatant evacuation in U.S. military history. The last U.S. military plane departed Kabul on 30 August at 11:59pm local time, just one minute before President Joe Biden’s deadline for withdrawal. The airlift signalled the end of the American-Afghan state that emerged after the 2001 invasion. The United States aimed to hunt down Osama bin Laden and dismantle the Taliban regime, leading to the establishment of a Western-style government. Over two decades, this system endured, but its collapse came swiftly. The Taliban's resurgence rendered the U.S.-backed institutions, including the national army, ineffective. Today, the Taliban commemorate 31 August as the day of liberation from foreign occupation. Annual celebrations include parades through Kabul’s central squares and celebratory gunfire echoing across the city. Kabul today presents a complex picture of urban decay and strict governance. Armed Taliban members patrol the streets, while destitute children beg for alms near traffic. In the city center, homeless girls play beneath colorful shopfronts that cater to a modest tourist presence. A local resident, who prefers anonymity, notes that life is calmer since the Taliban took control, but freedom has been significantly curtailed. He acknowledges that the current situation involves a trade-off, with security coming at the cost of personal liberties. The streets are indeed quiet, and the Taliban appear courteous, even friendly. However, the reality is more nuanced. The regime operates independently, enforcing its will through arbitrary arrests and detention without legal recourse. Understanding the Taliban requires looking beyond Kabul to Kandahar, the southern city serving as the heart of the Islamic Emirate. Here, Supreme Leader Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada and his advisors govern from behind the scenes. The journey from Kabul to Kandahar spans 300 miles, traversing arid plateaus and dusty landscapes. Along the route, semi-nomadic Kuchi communities reside in goat-hair tents, while mud-brick villages blend seamlessly into the environment. Approaching Kandahar, the city's outskirts reveal a sense of reverence. Three young girls swing incense burners, releasing plumes of smoke believed to ward off malevolent spirits. The city center is marked by extreme heat and omnipresent Taliban banners. Men clad in black keffiyehs ride motorbikes, kicking up clouds of dust. Women, fully veiled, beg on the streets. The economic hardship and religious fervor in Kandahar contrast sharply with the relative prosperity of Kabul, making the latter seem almost cosmopolitan in comparison. Photography is reportedly prohibited in the area. At the Ministry of Information and Culture, I sought permission to report in Kandahar. The waiting room was stifling, with two men slicing a large melon. I was offered a jar of pear drops, a peculiar yet revealing detail highlighting the Taliban's fondness for 1950s British confections. A senior local official, Inamullah Samangani, unexpectedly agreed to an impromptu interview. After a brief exchange, I was called to an air-conditioned room, where the conversation would continue.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

UnHerd logoUnHerdIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 708/29/2026
Inside the new Afghanistan

The article describes the current situation in Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover, focusing on the changes in Kabul and the broader nation. The author visits Kabul International Airport, noting the division between men and women based on traditional dress. The piece reflects on the chaotic U.S. evacuation in August 2021, marking the end of the American-led presence in the country. It highlights the collapse of the Western-style government established in 2001 and the subsequent rise of the Taliban, which now governs under the banner of the Islamic Emirate. While the author notes improved security and a sense of stability, they also emphasize the loss of personal freedoms and the repressive nature of the new regime. The narrative continues with a journey to Kandahar, the spiritual and political heart of the Taliban, describing the arid landscape and the distant presence of the Taliban leadership.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a descriptive account of the post-Taliban takeover situation in Afghanistan, highlighting both the perceived improvements in security and the loss of freedoms. It does not overtly favor one side over another, presenting observations and quotes from locals without clear editorial

Why factuality (75): The article accurately describes the events surrounding the fall of Kabul in 2021 and the subsequent Taliban rule. It mentions the evacuation, the timeline, and the current situation in Kabul. However, it lacks specific data such as exact casualty numbers or detailed policy changes under the Taliban

Why objectivity (70): The article presents a somewhat critical view of the US involvement and the collapse of the Afghan government, using terms like 'mirage' and 'unravelling took mere weeks.' While it attempts to remain objective, the phrasing leans slightly towards a narrative that emphasizes the failure of the US mis

iNews logoiNewsIndependentConservativeFactual 30Objective 209/3/2026
The innocent women betrayed by Muslim countries who should know better

The article criticizes Muslim-majority countries for their repression and lack of democracy, contrasting them with Western states. It discusses the impact of U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, which led to the Taliban regaining control and imposing strict restrictions on women's rights. The author recalls the emotional distress of Afghan civilians during the evacuation and highlights the contrast between the relative freedoms experienced under foreign occupation and the current oppressive conditions. The piece references reports of forced returns of refugees and describes specific cases of women being denied basic rights. While acknowledging some journalistic efforts to cover the situation, it suggests that many Britons remain unaware or indifferent.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Muslim-majority countries negatively, using loaded language such as 'unremittingly repressive' and 'blighted,' while criticizing Western policies in a more balanced manner. It emphasizes the negative consequences of U.S. involvement and withdrawal, portraying the Taliban as a regu

Why factuality (30): This article discusses topics unrelated to 'The March of Progress' and instead focuses on Muslim countries and the situation in Afghanistan. It contains no factual information related to the primary source document, making it irrelevant to the topic.

Why objectivity (20): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'repressive and undemocratic,' 'blighted of all,' and 'catastrophe' to describe Muslim countries and the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. It presents a highly biased perspective without presenting opposing viewpoints or balanced analysis.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories