ON
← Back to feed
Inside Russia’s latest ‘act of barbarism’ which left 16 dead, scores wounded
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 days ago

Inside Russia’s latest ‘act of barbarism’ which left 16 dead, scores wounded

A Russian 'double tap' strike on a shopping center in Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, resulted in at least 16 deaths and over 130 injuries, with reports indicating 23 children were among the wounded. The attack occurred in two waves, with the second wave targeting emergency responders. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the strike as an 'act of barbarism' and vowed a response. Regional Governor Oleksandr Hanzha reported nine people, including two children, remained missing. Legal experts argue such strikes violate the Geneva Convention by targeting civilians and emergency workers. This incident adds to accusations of Russian war crimes in Ukraine, including alleged use of cluster munitions and atrocities in Bucha.

A deadly strike on a civilian shopping centre in Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, left at least 16 people dead and more than 130 injured, marking another grim chapter in the ongoing conflict. The attack, carried out by Russian forces using a so-called “double tap” strategy, unfolded on Friday afternoon, drawing immediate condemnation from Ukrainian authorities and international observers. According to local officials, the strike targeted the city's largest shopping centre during the day, resulting in widespread destruction and casualties. The attack reportedly occurred in two phases, with the first wave hitting the shopping centre and the second targeting emergency responders at the scene. Video footage shared online appears to corroborate this account, showing a drone crashing into the already smoldering structure. The explosion sent thick plumes of black smoke into the sky, with witnesses describing chaos and panic among civilians trapped inside. Regional Governor Oleksandr Hanzha released images of the aftermath, highlighting the devastation caused by the strike. Among the injured were at least 23 children, according to local officials. Hanzha stated that 29 individuals remained in critical condition, including five minors. In a subsequent update, he revealed that nine people, among them two children, were still unaccounted for, raising concerns that the death toll could increase. The scale of the damage prompted urgent calls for aid, with rescue teams from four different regions mobilized to assist in clearing debris and searching for survivors. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the attack as an “act of barbarism” and “absolutely cynical and despicable.” He emphasized that such strikes constituted “terrorist acts” and vowed that Ukraine would “definitely respond” to the aggression. While Zelensky did not specify the nature of the retaliation, his remarks underscored the growing intensity of hostilities. Kryvyi Rih Mayor Oleksandr Vilkul echoed this sentiment, calling the perpetrators “animals” and mourning the lives lost in the assault. The strike has intensified scrutiny over Russia’s adherence to international humanitarian law. Legal experts argue that the “double tap” tactic violates provisions of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit attacks on civilians, the wounded, and emergency personnel. This method, involving sequential strikes to maximize casualties, has been previously documented in Russian operations against Ukrainian cities. Additionally, there are credible reports that Russia has employed banned weapons, including cluster munitions, which were outlawed in a 2010 treaty ratified by numerous countries. Beyond the legal implications, the attack has reignited global outrage over Russia’s broader conduct in the war. Recent atrocities in areas like Bucha have drawn sharp criticism for their brutality, while allegations of prisoner abuse and the unlawful relocation of Ukrainian children have further eroded Russia’s standing internationally. The Kryvyi Rih incident adds yet another layer to this complex narrative, reinforcing accusations of systematic violations of human rights and wartime ethics. As investigations into the attack unfold, the situation remains volatile. Ukrainian officials have pledged to hold Russia accountable, though the exact measures remain unclear. Meanwhile, the international community continues to monitor developments closely, with renewed calls for accountability and justice for the victims of this tragic event.

1 reports

iNews logoiNewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
Inside Russia’s latest ‘act of barbarism’ which left 16 dead, scores wounded

A Russian 'double tap' strike on a shopping center in Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, resulted in at least 16 deaths and over 130 injuries, with reports indicating 23 children were among the wounded. The attack occurred in two waves, with the second wave targeting emergency responders. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the strike as an 'act of barbarism' and vowed a response. Regional Governor Oleksandr Hanzha reported nine people, including two children, remained missing. Legal experts argue such strikes violate the Geneva Convention by targeting civilians and emergency workers. This incident adds to accusations of Russian war crimes in Ukraine, including alleged use of cluster munitions and atrocities in Bucha.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Russian strike as a war crime and emphasizes Ukrainian condemnation, using strong language like 'act of barbarism' and 'cynical and despicable.' It highlights legal violations and aligns with Western narratives critical of Russian actions. While presenting facts objectively, a

Why factuality (85): The article reports a Russian strike on a Ukrainian shopping center resulting in casualties, citing Ukrainian officials and Zelensky's statements. It aligns with cross-source consensus regarding the number of casualties and the nature of the attack. However, it does not provide independent verificat

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'act of barbarism' and describes Russian attackers as 'animals,' indicating a pro-Ukrainian bias. While it presents both sides' reactions, it emphasizes Ukrainian outrage more prominently.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories