ON
← Back to feed
Influencer sells a used couch for 3700 euros, people can't believe the price
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter17 hr. ago

Influencer sells a used couch for 3700 euros, people can't believe the price

Australian fitness influencer Sarah Stevenson faced criticism after listing a used designer sofa on Facebook Marketplace for 6000 Australian dollars (around 3700 euros), despite it having visible signs of wear. The sofa, purchased six years ago for approximately 7000 euros, was described by Stevenson as no longer in perfect condition due to her children eating on it. In a video posted mid-May, she acknowledged the stains but claimed the fabric lost its original vibrant color after professional cleaning. Many social media users questioned the high price for a used item with visible flaws, with some criticizing the lack of clear information about the sofa's condition in the listing. Comments ranged from disbelief at the asking price to accusations that the sofa looked 'completely ruined' and that it would feel uncomfortable. Some users expressed frustration that someone would pay such a high amount for a visibly worn item.

An Australian fitness influencer has sparked controversy after attempting to sell a used designer sofa for $6,000 (approximately €3,700), with many social media users questioning the price given its visible signs of wear. Sarah Stevenson, known online as Sarah’s Day, listed the pink three-seater Jordan Wilfred sofa on Facebook Marketplace. The 33-year-old influencer originally purchased the piece around six years ago for roughly €7,000 and is now asking more than half of its original value. In a video posted mid-May, Stevenson acknowledged that the sofa is no longer in perfect condition. She explained that there are stains on the fabric because her children often ate while sitting on it. “There are a few stains because the kids were eating on it. I just stopped caring and let them eat on the couch,” she said. She added that she had taken the sofa to professional cleaning, but the fabric lost its original vibrant pink color afterward. “It should have been a beautiful, bright pink, but now it has this grayish tone,” she noted, adding that she did not want people to think her home was messy. The listing drew immediate criticism from social media users who found the price unreasonable for a used item with noticeable damage. Some pointed out that the advertisement did not clearly list all the flaws of the furniture. One user commented, “If I have $6,000 for a sofa, I’ll buy something brand new.” Others described the sofa as “completely ransacked” or even more direct: “Oh my God, it actually looks ugly.” Several users expressed discomfort with the idea of someone spending such a large sum on the piece. One user joked, “I wouldn’t take it even if it was free.” Stevenson's decision to list the sofa at such a high price came despite her admission of its imperfections. While she claimed the sofa had undergone professional cleaning, the change in color and presence of stains raised questions about its overall condition. Many users argued that the price did not reflect the actual state of the item, especially considering the visible damage and the need for additional repairs. The incident highlights the growing debate over the pricing of second-hand luxury items, particularly among influencers who often showcase their possessions online. Critics argue that such listings can set unrealistic expectations for buyers and create confusion about the true value of used goods. Meanwhile, supporters of Stevenson suggest that personal preferences and sentimental value play a role in how individuals assign worth to their belongings. The situation has also drawn attention to the broader issue of transparency in online marketplaces, where detailed descriptions of product conditions are crucial for informed purchasing decisions. Some users called for stricter guidelines to ensure sellers provide accurate information about the state of their items before posting them for sale. As the discussion continues, it remains to be seen whether Stevenson will adjust the price or address the concerns raised by potential buyers. For now, the sofa remains listed on Facebook Marketplace, with the initial asking price still in place.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7217 hr. ago
Influencer sells a used couch for 3700 euros, people can't believe the price

Australian fitness influencer Sarah Stevenson faced criticism after listing a used designer sofa on Facebook Marketplace for 6000 Australian dollars (around 3700 euros), despite it having visible signs of wear. The sofa, purchased six years ago for approximately 7000 euros, was described by Stevenson as no longer in perfect condition due to her children eating on it. In a video posted mid-May, she acknowledged the stains but claimed the fabric lost its original vibrant color after professional cleaning. Many social media users questioned the high price for a used item with visible flaws, with some criticizing the lack of clear information about the sofa's condition in the listing. Comments ranged from disbelief at the asking price to accusations that the sofa looked 'completely ruined' and that it would feel uncomfortable. Some users expressed frustration that someone would pay such a high amount for a visibly worn item.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation, focusing on public reaction to the influencer's pricing and condition disclosure rather than taking a partisan stance. It reports on user comments without apparent ideological bias, highlighting both the influencer's justification and the public

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the incident involving influencer Sarah Stevenson selling a used sofa on Facebook Marketplace for $6000 AUD (around €3700) despite visible signs of wear. It cites the NY Post as a source and includes quotes from Stevenson explaining the condition of the sofa and her re

Why objectivity (72): The article presents the situation neutrally but does include some emotionally charged comments from users, such as calling the sofa 'ružan' (ugly) and expressing disbelief at the price. While it doesn't take sides directly, the inclusion of these user reactions may slightly skew the narrative towar

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories