ON
← Back to feed
‘Clearly, there’s something wrong’: Gavaskar questions India’s fitness methods
India⚽ SportsCenter7 days ago

‘Clearly, there’s something wrong’: Gavaskar questions India’s fitness methods

Former India cricket captain Sunil Gavaskar has criticized the current fitness strategies employed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), citing a high incidence of injuries among key players such as Jasprit Bumrah, Hardik Pandya, and others. Gavaskar argues that the recurring hamstring injuries suggest flaws in the team's training methods rather than blaming the physiotherapy staff at the BCCI's Centre of Excellence in Bengaluru. He questions the practice of limiting bowlers' net sessions based on biomechanical considerations and emphasizes the importance of match-specific fitness over gym-based routines. Gavaskar calls for a comprehensive review of the reasons behind the repeated injuries, noting that the current approach may not adequately prepare players for the physical demands of actual matches. Captain Shubman Gill has also raised concerns about the impact of frequent injuries on team selection and performance ahead of the upcoming World Cup.

Shubman Gill spent over an hour at the Nondescript Cricket Club (NCC) nets in Colombo on Monday, engaging in a focused batting session following an injury that had kept him sidelined. The session took place shortly after the start of Day 3 of the ongoing cricketing activities at the venue. Accompanied by net bowlers and coaches including Gautam Gambhir, Morne Morkel, Sairaj Bahutale, and Sitanshu Kotak, Gill worked through a variety of deliveries, with spin bowling forming a key component of his preparation. Despite taping around his thumb initially, Gill showed no signs of discomfort and eventually removed the support as he continued his session. The practice began at 10:05 am and concluded around 11:25 am, drawing considerable attention from the coaching staff and support personnel present at the ground. Gill’s participation in the nets comes amid uncertainty regarding his availability for the ongoing warm-up matches. According to reports, the Indian team management is cautious about risking Gill ahead of crucial fixtures, given the nature of his injury. This decision aligns with broader concerns within the squad, as multiple players are currently dealing with fitness-related issues. The team is also looking to name a replacement for Sai Sudharsan, who has been ruled out of the series due to injury. Potential candidates include Shaik Rasheed, Sarfaraz Khan, and Ruturaj Gaikwad, each of whom is being considered for the vacant spot. Meanwhile, Dhruv Jurel found himself in a reflective mood at the NCC grounds, where he sat alone before being approached by Sarfaraz Khan, who had recently joined the team. The pair shared a unique connection, having made their Test debuts together against England in Rajkot two years prior. However, their careers have diverged significantly since then. While Sarfaraz has struggled to secure regular playing opportunities, Jurel has carved out a niche as a specialist batter, earning recognition as a backup wicketkeeper-batter for India’s limited-overs squads despite the presence of Rishabh Pant. Jurel’s journey has been marked by inconsistency, with strong performances in preparatory matches often failing to translate into success on the international stage. Prior to the 2024 Border-Gavaskar Trophy, Jurel was dispatched to the India A team, where he posted notable scores of 80 and 68 in two matches at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG). However, his contribution in the main series was minimal, with scores of 11 and 1 in the only Test he played. Later, during the Anderson-Tendulkar Test series, Jurel scored 94 and 53 not out against England Lions, but his efforts did not immediately secure a permanent place in the senior side. India’s recent fixtures against the West Indies and South Africa presented another opportunity for Jurel to establish himself. During the home series, he scored a century against the West Indies in Ahmedabad but managed only 29 runs across four innings against South Africa. His performance in these matches drew mixed reactions from the coaching staff, who reportedly expressed disappointment with his lack of consistency. The situation worsened further during the subsequent white-ball fixtures and the one-off Test against Afghanistan, where Jurel returned with a meager total of 19 runs. The growing list of injuries affecting the Indian team has sparked discussions about the effectiveness of the Centre of Excellence (COE) in managing player fitness. Jasprit Bumrah, one of the team’s most critical players, has been sidelined due to a knee injury, raising concerns about the team’s ability to handle such setbacks. Other players, including Harshit Rana, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Washington Sundar, are also nursing various injuries, complicating preparations for upcoming fixtures. Former India batter Subramaniam Badrinath addressed these concerns, clarifying that the COE does not make decisions about player selections. Instead, its role is to provide detailed assessments of a player’s physical condition and readiness. The ultimate call on whether a player should participate in a match lies with the captain, coach, and selectors. Badrinath emphasized that injuries are an inherent aspect of elite sports and highlighted the importance of workload management and consistent monitoring to minimize risks. He noted that each injury case presents unique challenges, requiring tailored approaches rather than a one-size-fits-all solution. As the team navigates this period of uncertainty, the focus remains on ensuring players receive adequate care and support to maintain their fitness levels.

4 reports

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7511 days ago
‘I don't know who made the decision’: Ex-India batter on Bumrah's workload

India's cricket team is facing multiple injuries among key players, including Jasprit Bumrah, who has been ruled out of the upcoming Test series against Sri Lanka due to a knee injury. Several other players are dealing with various injuries, raising concerns about the team's injury management and rehabilitation systems. Former India batter Subramaniam Badrinath emphasized that the Centre of Excellence (COE) provides medical assessments but does not make selection decisions. He clarified that the final choice regarding player availability lies with the captain, coach, and selectors. Badrinath also highlighted the importance of workload management and fitness monitoring to prevent recurring injuries, noting that different players face distinct injury challenges.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of the issue without overtly favoring any political stance. While it discusses the implications of the injuries on national sports strategy, it avoids taking a clear ideological position. The focus is on the operational aspects of team management ratherthan

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the current injury situation within the Indian cricket team, including specific injuries to multiple players and the impact on the team's preparation. It references statements from a former player regarding the role of the Centre of Excellence, though

Why objectivity (75): The tone of the article is informative but leans slightly toward highlighting concerns about the team's injury management. While it presents facts neutrally, there is a subtle emphasis on questioning the effectiveness of the Centre of Excellence, which may reflect a broader narrative in the media ra

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 727 days ago
‘Clearly, there’s something wrong’: Gavaskar questions India’s fitness methods

Former India cricket captain Sunil Gavaskar has criticized the current fitness strategies employed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), citing a high incidence of injuries among key players such as Jasprit Bumrah, Hardik Pandya, and others. Gavaskar argues that the recurring hamstring injuries suggest flaws in the team's training methods rather than blaming the physiotherapy staff at the BCCI's Centre of Excellence in Bengaluru. He questions the practice of limiting bowlers' net sessions based on biomechanical considerations and emphasizes the importance of match-specific fitness over gym-based routines. Gavaskar calls for a comprehensive review of the reasons behind the repeated injuries, noting that the current approach may not adequately prepare players for the physical demands of actual matches. Captain Shubman Gill has also raised concerns about the impact of frequent injuries on team selection and performance ahead of the upcoming World Cup.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses sports-related issues concerning cricket fitness and injury management within the Indian national team. There is no explicit political framing or commentary on governmental policies, officials, or public policy decisions. The content remains focused on athletic performance and

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on Sunil Gavaskar's public comments questioning India's fitness methods and the list of injured players. It references VVS Laxman and others involved in the CoE's defense, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the issue involves both training methods and physio

Why objectivity (72): The article presents Gavaskar's concerns and quotes him directly, but it frames the issue as a criticism of the current system rather than presenting multiple perspectives. There is some editorializing in the phrasing such as 'clearly something wrong' and 'unfortunately the blame is put on the physi

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8512 days ago
Sundar's Sri Lanka Test availability in doubt, chances of joining team 'very slim'

The article discusses concerns over Washington Sundar's availability for the second Test against Sri Lanka due to his ongoing recovery from a hamstring injury. The selectors had planned to include him only for the second Test, but the BCCI medical team is cautious about risking his health. There is uncertainty whether Sundar will join the team, as his fitness remains uncertain. Additionally, other players like Jasprit Bumrah and Akash Deep are also sidelined due to injuries, with no clear timelines for their returns. The BCCI is considering whether to send Sundar without prior game time and is assessing the team's situation in Sri Lanka. The article highlights the challenges faced by the team due to multiple injuries.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about player availability and team strategy without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While it discusses the implications of player injuries on national sports performance, it does not take a partisan position or frame the issue through a politically-

Why factuality (75): The article provides specific details about Washington Sundar's injury status, the selectors' decision-making process, and the BCCI's cautious approach. These claims are consistent with the general consensus found in other reports about the situation. However, some specifics like the exact nature of

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts from the BCCI perspective without overt bias. It avoids strong language or opinionated statements, focusing on reporting what sources within the organization have stated.

Deccan Herald logoDeccan HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 7015 days ago
Indian cricket’s mounting injury crisis

The article discusses the growing issue of injuries among Indian cricketers, highlighting concerns over player availability and performance during international matches. It notes that several key players have been sidelined due to injuries, affecting team strategies and results. The piece emphasizes the need for improved medical support and training methods to address this challenge. While the article presents the problem without overtly taking sides, it underscores the urgency of resolving the crisis to maintain competitive edge.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on the sports-related issue of player injuries without engaging in political discourse or taking a partisan stance. As such, it does not exhibit a discernible ideological leaning.

Why factuality (65): The article discusses the 'mounting injury crisis' in Indian cricket but lacks specific data or sources to support the claim. While the general issue of player injuries is widely acknowledged in sports journalism, the lack of detailed statistics or expert analysis limits the factual depth. Cross-sou

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, focusing on reporting the issue rather than taking sides. However, the phrasing 'mounting injury crisis' may carry some emotional weight, suggesting urgency without providing context on the severity or causes. The article does not offer alternative viewpoints or

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories